bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Tzanou, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Tzanou, A..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Stimulus-specificity of surround-induced responses in primary visual cortex

Recent work suggests that stimuli in the surround can drive V1 neurons even without direct visual input to the classical receptive field (RF). These surround-induced responses may represent a prediction of the occluded stimulus, a prediction error, or alternatively, a representation of the gray patch covering the RF. Using Neuropixels recordings in mouse V1, we found that a distal surround stimulus increased V1 firing rates for gray patches up to 90{degrees} in diameter, while LGN firing rates decreased for the same stimuli. These responses occurred across a wide range of conditions: they were elicited by both moving and stationary surround stimuli, did not require spatial continuity or motion coherence, and persisted even for large gray patches (90{degrees}) where there was no mismatch between the classical RF stimulus ([~]20{degrees}) and the near surround. They also emerged when the gray patch appeared as a salient object against a uniform black or white background. Additionally, response magnitudes and latencies were highly similar for black/white uniform surface stimuli on a gray background, with latencies increasing with the gray-patch diameter. These findings are difficult to reconcile with the predictive coding interpretation and fit best with the hypothesis that surround-induced responses reflect the representation of the uniform surface itself and may thereby contribute to image segmentation processes.

neuroscience↗

Optogenetic stimulation reveals frequency-dependent resonance and encoding in V1 excitatory and inhibitory neurons

Cortical information processing is thought to be facilitated by the resonant properties of individual neurons and neuronal networks, which selectively amplify inputs at specific frequencies. We used optogenetics to test how different input frequencies are encoded by excitatory cells and parvalbumin-expressing (PV) interneurons in mouse V1. Spike phase-locking and power increased with frequency, reaching a broad peak around 80-100Hz. This effect was observed only for Chronos, a fast-kinetic opsin, but not for Channelrhodopsin-2. Surprisingly, neurons did not exhibit narrow-band resonance in specific frequency-ranges, and showed reliably phase-locking up to 140Hz. Strong phase-locking at high frequencies reflected non-linear input/output transformations, with neurons firing only in a narrow part of the cycle. By contrast, low-frequency inputs were encoded in a more continuous manner. Correspondingly, spectral coherence and firing rates showed little dependence on frequency and did not reflect transferred power. To investigate whether strong phase-locking facilitated the reliable encoding of inputs, we analyzed various spike-train distances and Fano factor. Interestingly, responses to lower rather than higher frequencies had more globally reliable spike-counts and timing structure. These findings have various practical implications for understanding the effects of optogenetic stimulation and choice of opsin. Furthermore, they show both PV and excitatory neurons respond with more local precision, i.e. phase-locking, to high-frequency inputs, but have more globally reliable responses to low-frequency inputs, suggesting differential coding regimes for these frequencies.

neuroscience↗

Distinct roles of PV and Sst interneurons in visually-induced gamma oscillations

Sensory processing relies on interactions between excitatory and inhibitory neurons, which are often coordinated by 30-80Hz gamma oscillations. However, the specific contributions of distinct interneurons to gamma synchronization remain unclear. We performed high-density recordings from V1 in awake mice and used optogenetics to identify PV+ (Parvalbumin) and Sst+ (Somatostatin) interneurons. PV interneurons were highly phase-locked to visually-induced gamma oscillations. Sst cells were heterogeneous, with only a subset of narrow-waveform cells showing strong gamma phase-locking. Interestingly, PV interneurons consistently fired at an earlier phase in the gamma cycle ({approx}6ms or 60 degrees) than Sst interneurons. Consequently, PV and Sst activity showed differential temporal relations with excitatory cells. In particular, the 1st and 2nd spikes in burst events, which were strongly gamma phase-locked, shortly preceded PV and Sst activity, respectively. These findings indicate a primary role of PV interneurons in synchronizing excitatory cells and suggest that PV and Sst interneurons control the excitability of somatic and dendritic neural compartments with precise time delays coordinated by gamma oscillations.

neuroscience↗

Cell-type-specific propagation of visual flicker

Rhythmic flicker stimulation has gained interest as a treatment for neurodegenerative diseases and a method for frequency tagging neural activity in human EEG/MEG recordings. Yet, little is known about the way in which flicker-induced synchronization propagates across cortical levels and impacts different cell types. Here, we used Neuropixels to simultaneously record from LGN, V1, and CA1 while presenting visual flicker stimuli at different frequencies. LGN neurons showed strong phase locking up to 40Hz, whereas phase locking was substantially weaker in V1 units and absent in CA1 units. Laminar analyses revealed an attenuation of phase locking at 40Hz for each processing stage, with substantially weaker phase locking in the superficial layers of V1. Gamma-rhythmic flicker predominantly entrained fast-spiking interneurons. Optotagging experiments showed that these neurons correspond to either PV+ or narrow-waveform Sst+ neurons. A computational model could explain the observed differences in phase locking based on the neurons capacitative low-pass filtering properties. In summary, the propagation of synchronized activity and its effect on distinct cell types strongly depend on its frequency.

neuroscience↗