bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Turner, A. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Turner, A. M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

The WalKR two-component regulator coordinates cell wall homeostasis with DNA replication in Staphylococcus aureus

Among the 16 two-component systems (TCSs) in the opportunistic human pathogen Staphylococcus aureus, only WalKR is essential. Like orthologous systems in other Bacillota, S. aureus WalKR controls autolysins involved in peptidoglycan remodelling and is therefore intimately involved in cell division. However, despite the importance of WalKR in S. aureus, the basis for its essentiality is not understood and the regulon poorly defined. Here, we defined a consensus WalR DNA-binding motif and the direct WalKR regulon by using functional genomics, including ChIP-seq, with a panel of isogenic walKR mutants that had a spectrum of altered activities. Consistent with prior findings, the direct regulon includes multiple autolysin genes. However, this work also revealed that WalR directly regulates at least five essential genes involved in lipoteichoic acid synthesis (ltaS); translation (rplK); DNA compaction (hup); initiation of DNA replication (dnaA, hup); and purine nucleotide metabolism (prs). Thus, WalKR in S. aureus serves as a polyfunctional regulator that contributes to fundamental control over critical cell processes by co-ordinately linking cell wall homeostasis with purine biosynthesis, protein biosynthesis, and DNA replication. Collectively, our findings address the essentiality of this locus and highlight the importance of WalKR as a bona fide target for novel anti-staphylococcal therapeutics.

microbiology↗

Local and collective transitions in sparsely-interacting ecological communities

Interactions in natural communities can be highly heterogeneous, with any given species interacting appreciably with only some of the others, a situation commonly represented by sparse interaction networks. We study the consequences of sparse competitive interactions, in a theoretical model of a community assembled from a species pool. We find that communities can be in a number of different regimes, depending on the interaction strength. When interactions are strong, the network of coexisting species breaks up into small subgraphs, while for weaker interactions these graphs are larger and more complex, eventually encompassing all species. This process is driven by emergence of new allowed subgraphs as interaction strength decreases, leading to sharp changes in diversity and other community properties, and at weaker interactions to two distinct collective transitions: a percolation transition, and a transition between having a unique equilibrium and having multiple alternative equilibria. Understanding community structure is thus made up of two parts: first, finding which subgraphs are allowed at a given interaction strength, and secondly, a discrete problem of matching these structures over the entire community. In a shift from the focus of many previous theories, these different regimes can be traversed by modifying the interaction strength alone, without need for heterogeneity in either interaction strengths or the number of competitors per species.

ecology↗