bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Turkki, R.

Publications and source records attributed to Turkki, R..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Cell morphological profiling enables high-throughput screening for PROteolysis TArgeting Chimera (PROTAC) phenotypic signature

PROTACs (PROteolysis TArgeting Chimeras) use the ubiquitin-proteasome system to degrade a protein of interest for therapeutic benefit. Advances in targeted protein degradation technology have been remarkable with several molecules moving into clinical studies. However, robust routes to assess and better understand the safety risks of PROTACs need to be identified, which is an essential step towards delivering efficacious and safe compounds to patients. In this work, we used Cell Painting, an unbiased high content imaging method, to identify phenotypic signatures of PROTACs. Chemical clustering and model prediction allowed the identification of a mitotoxicity signature that could not be expected by screening the individual PROTAC components. The data highlighted the benefit of unbiased phenotypic methods for identifying toxic signatures and the potential to impact drug design. HighlightsO_LIMorphological profiling detects various PROTACs phenotypic signatures C_LIO_LIPhenotypic signatures can be attributed to diverse biological responses C_LIO_LIChemical clustering from phenotypic signatures separates on drug selection C_LIO_LITrained in-silico machine learning models to predict PROTACs mitochondrial toxicity C_LI

pharmacology and toxicology↗

Label-free prediction of Cell Painting from brightfield images

Cell Painting is a high-content image-based assay which can reveal rich cellular morphology and is applied in drug discovery to predict bioactivity, assess toxicity and understand diverse mechanisms of action of chemical and genetic perturbations. In this study, we investigate label-free Cell Painting by predicting the five fluorescent Cell Painting channels from paired brightfield z-stacks using deep learning models. We train and validate the models with a dataset representing 1000s of pan-assay interference compounds sampled from 17 unique batches. The model predictions are evaluated using a test set from two additional batches, treated with compounds comprised from a publicly available phenotypic set. In addition to pixel-level evaluation, we process the label-free Cell Painting images with a segmentation-based feature-extraction pipeline to understand whether the generated images are useful in downstream analysis. The mean Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) of the images across all five channels is 0.84. Without actually incorporating these features into the model training we achieved a mean correlation of 0.45 from the features extracted from the images. Additionally we identified 30 features which correlated greater than 0.8 to the ground truth. Toxicity analysis on the label-free Cell Painting resulted a sensitivity of 62.5% and specificity of 99.3% on images from unseen batches. Additionally, we provide a breakdown of the feature profiles by channel and feature type to understand the potential and limitation of the approach in morphological profiling. Our findings demonstrate that label-free Cell Painting has potential above the improved visualization of cellular components, and it can be used for downstream analysis. The findings also suggest that label-free Cell Painting could allow for repurposing the imaging channels for other non-generic fluorescent stains of more targeted biological interest, thus increasing the information content of the assay.

bioinformatics↗