bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Turaga, N.

Publications and source records attributed to Turaga, N..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

scDiagnostics: systematic assessment of cell type annotation in single-cell transcriptomics data

Although cell type annotation has become an integral part of single-cell analysis workflows, the assessment of computational annotations remains challenging. Many annotation tools transfer labels from an annotated reference dataset to a new query dataset of interest, but blindly transferring labels from one dataset to another has its own set of challenges. Often enough there is no perfect alignment between datasets, especially when transferring annotations from a healthy reference atlas for the discovery of disease states. We present scDiagnostics, a new open-source software package that facilitates the detection of complex or ambiguous annotation cases that may otherwise go unnoticed, thus addressing a critical unmet need in current single-cell analysis workflows. scDiagnostics is equipped with novel diagnostic methods that are compatible with all major cell type annotation tools. We demonstrate that scDiagnostics reliably detects complex or conflicting annotations using both carefully designed simulated datasets and diverse real-world single-cell datasets. Our evaluation demonstrates that scDiagnostics reliably identifies misleading annotations that systematically distort downstream analysis and interpretation and that would otherwise remain undetected. The scDiagnostics R package is available from Bioconductor (https://bioconductor.org/packages/scDiagnostics).

bioinformatics↗

Towards a gold standard for benchmarking gene set enrichment analysis

BackgroundAlthough gene set enrichment analysis has become an integral part of high-throughput gene expression data analysis, the assessment of enrichment methods remains rudimentary and ad hoc. In the absence of suitable gold standards, evaluations are commonly restricted to selected data sets and biological reasoning on the relevance of resulting enriched gene sets. However, this is typically incomplete and biased towards the goals of individual investigations.\n\nResultsWe present a general framework for standardized and structured benchmarking of enrichment methods based on defined criteria for applicability, gene set prioritization, and detection of relevant processes. This framework incorporates a curated compendium of 75 expression data sets investigating 42 different human diseases. The compendium features microarray and RNA-seq measurements, and each dataset is associated with a precompiled GO/KEGG relevance ranking for the corresponding disease under investigation. We perform a comprehensive assessment of 10 major enrichment methods on the benchmark compendium, identifying significant differences in (i) runtime and applicability to RNA-seq data, (ii) fraction of enriched gene sets depending on the type of null hypothesis tested, and (iii) recovery of the a priori defined relevance rankings. Based on these findings, we make practical recommendations on (i) how methods originally developed for microarray data can efficiently be applied to RNA-seq data, (ii) how to interpret results depending on the type of gene set test conducted, and (iii) which methods are best suited to effectively prioritize gene sets with high relevance for the phenotype investigated.\n\nConclusionWe carried out a systematic assessment of existing enrichment methods, and identified best performing methods, but also general shortcomings in how gene set analysis is currently conducted. We provide a directly executable benchmark system for straightforward assessment of additional enrichment methods.\n\nAvailabilityhttp://bioconductor.org/packages/GSEABenchmarkeR

bioinformatics↗