bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Tsuchida, H.

Publications and source records attributed to Tsuchida, H..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

The BRCA1- RAD51 Axis Regulates SCAI/REV3 Dependent Replication Fork Maintenance

Replication stress is a key contributor to genomic instability and cancers. BRCA1 has well established roles in protecting stalled forks against degradation. Here we show that BRCA1 has a fork protection-independent role via regulation of RAD51 in a manner that confers dependency on SCAI and REV3. SCAI loss leads to elevated DNA breaks, genomic instability and cell death upon DNA damage. We show that the increased DNA breaks occur in S phase, consistent with fork breakage. BRCA1 drives SLX4-SLX1-ERCC1 mediated DNA break formation in the absence of SCAI and REV3, which are required to maintain integrity of stalled forks for efficient restart. Domain analysis revealed that the increased break signaling seen in the absence of SCAI does not require binding to resection factors like CtIP. Surprisingly, loss of fork reversal factors leads to additive increases in damage signaling and elevated fork shortening in the absence of SCAI/REV3 in a manner that depends on RAD51 activity. We propose that Protexin may be required to replicate through and maintain stalled replication forks at fragile genomic regions. Failure to do so leads to increased DNA breakage and genomic instability.

cell biology↗

RADIF(C1orf112)-FIGNL1 Complex Regulates RAD51 Chromatin Association to Promote Viability After Replication Stress

Homologous recombination (HR) plays critical roles in repairing lesions that arise during DNA replication and is thus essential for viability. RAD51 plays important roles during replication and HR, however, how RAD51 is regulated downstream of nucleofilament formation and how the varied RAD51 functions are regulated is not clear. We have investigated the poorly characterized protein c1orf112/RADIF that previously scored in genome-wide screens for mediators of DNA inter-strand crosslink (ICL) repair. Upon ICL agent exposure, RADIF loss leads to marked cell death, elevated chromosomal instability, increased micronuclei formation, altered cell cycle progression and increased DNA damage signaling. RADIF is recruited to damage foci and forms a complex with FIGNL1. Both proteins have epistatic roles in ICL repair, forming a co-stable complex. Mechanistically, RADIF loss leads to increased RAD51 amounts and foci on chromatin both with or without exogenous DNA damage, defective replication fork progression and reduced HR competency. We posit that RADIF is essential for limiting RAD51 levels on chromatin in the absence of damage and for RAD51 dissociation from nucleofilaments to properly complete HR. Failure to do so leads to replication slowing and inability to complete repair.

biochemistry↗

Pharmacologic Therapy for Engraftment Arrhythmia Induced by Transplantation of Human Cardiomyocytes

BackgroundEngraftment arrhythmias (EAs) are observed in large animal studies of intramyocardial transplantation of human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hPSC-CMs) for myocardial infarction. Although transient, the risk posed by EA presents a barrier to clinical translation. ObjectivesWe hypothesized that clinically approved antiarrhythmic drugs can prevent EA-related mortality as well as suppress tachycardia and arrhythmia burden. MethodshPSC-CM were transplanted into the infarcted porcine heart by surgical or percutaneous delivery to induce EA. Following a screen of antiarrhythmic agents, a prospective study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of amiodarone plus ivabradine in preventing cardiac death and suppressing EA. ResultsEA was observed in all subjects, and amiodarone-ivabradine treatment was well-tolerated. None of the treated subjects experienced the primary endpoint of cardiac death, unstable EA or heart failure compared to 5/8 (62.5%) in the control cohort (hazard ratio 0.00; 95% confidence interval, 0-0.297; p = 0.002). Overall survival including two deaths in the treated cohort from immunosuppression-related infection showed borderline improvement with treatment (hazard ratio 0.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-1.01; p = 0.05). Without treatment, peak heart rate averaged 305 {+/-} 29 beats per min (bpm), whereas in treated subjects peak daily heart rate was significantly restricted to 185{+/-}9 bpm (p = 0.006). Similarly, treatment reduced peak daily EA burden from 96.8 {+/-} 2.9% to 76.5 {+/-} 7.9% (p = 0.003). Antiarrhythmic treatment was safely discontinued after approximately one-month of treatment without recrudescence of arrhythmia. ConclusionsThe risk of engraftment arrhythmia following hPSC-CM transplantation can be reduced significantly by combined amiodarone and ivabradine drug therapy. Condensed AbstractEngraftment arrhythmia (EA) is a transient but serious complication of cardiac remuscularization therapy. Using a porcine model of cardiac remuscularization and EA, ivabradine and amiodarone were independently effective in suppressing tachycardia and arrhythmia, respectively. Baseline amiodarone combined with adjunctive ivabradine successfully prevented cardiac death, unstable EA and heart failure (hazard ratio 0.00; 95% confidence interval, 0-0.297; p = 0.002) and significantly suppressed peak daily heart rate and arrhythmia burden (p=0.006 and 0.003, respectively). Antiarrhythmic treatment was successfully discontinued after one-month without recrudescence of arrhythmia. We conclude that EA can be suppressed by combined amiodarone and ivabradine drug therapy.

pharmacology and toxicology↗