bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Tse, N. Y.

Publications and source records attributed to Tse, N. Y..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Unveiling the Multifaceted Networks of the Left DLPFC for Precision TMS Targeting

The left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (lDLPFC) is the standard transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) target for treatment-resistant depression (TRD), yet non-response rates remain high. TMS efficacy has been linked to the stimulation sites functional connectivity, particularly its anti-correlation with the subgenual cingulate cortex (SGC). While this pragmatic strategy has demonstrated clinical utility, it offers limited insight into how the lDLPFCs network interactions contribute to site-dependent variability in treatment response. Here, we used connectivity-based parcellation within a region of interest encompassing common TMS targets in the left prefrontal cortex (TMS-PFC) to delineate functionally distinct subregions and characterize their large-scale network connectivity and behavioral associations. Our results revealed a hierarchical organization: a coarse two-pole antagonism between anterior-central and superior-posterior subregions and a finer nine-cluster architecture exposing the heterogeneity along anterior-posterior and ventral-dorsal axes within TMS-PFC. Anterior-central areas were strongly anti-correlated with SGC and default-mode network, positively connected with salience, dorsal attention, and control networks, and associated with cognitive control. In contrast, superior-posterior subregions displayed the inverse pattern, while ventral clusters engaged somatomotor and visual networks, and language-related processes. Central and superior-anterior clusters showed differentiated profiles, including associations with inhibition, social cognition, and perceptual functions. To aid clinical translation, we derived a likelihood map integrating granularities, highlighting the anterior-central subregion as the strongest TMS candidate given its connectivity and behavioral relevance in depression, while indicating that neighboring subregions have distinct functions. These findings underscore the hierarchical and heterogeneous organization of TMS-PFC and provide a network-informed reference for developing individualized, symptom-specific TMS interventions. HighlightsO_LITMS targets within the left PFC encompass nine functionally distinct subregions C_LIO_LISubregions differ in SGC, DMN, salience, attention, and control network connectivity C_LIO_LIAnterior-central and superior-posterior subregions show antagonistic profiles C_LIO_LIA likelihood map identifies the anterior-central subregion as optimal TMS target C_LIO_LIFindings provide a network-informed reference for symptom-specific TMS targeting C_LI

neuroscience↗

The effect of stimulation interval on plasticity following repeated blocks of intermittent theta burst stimulation

IntroductionTheta burst stimulation (TBS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation paradigm capable of influencing cortical circuits in humans by inducing neural plasticity. Applying spaced blocks of TBS can affect both the direction and magnitude of plasticity, but the impact of interval duration on these interactions following intermittent TBS (iTBS) is unclear.\n\nObjectivesTo assess the effect of interval duration on plasticity magnitude/direction following spaced iTBS.\n\nMethods15 healthy participants received three different iTBS conditions on separate days: single iTBS; spaced iTBS with a 5 minute interval (iTBS-5); and spaced iTBS with a 15 minute interval (iTBS-15). Changes in cortical excitability and short-interval cortical inhibition (SICI) resulting from iTBS were assessed via motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) measured from the first dorsal interosseus muscle before and up to 60 mins following stimulation.\n\nResultsiTBS-15 increased MEP amplitude up to 60 mins post stimulation, whereas iTBS-5 decreased MEP amplitude. In contrast, MEP amplitude was not altered by single iTBS. Despite the significant effect of iTBS-15 on MEP amplitude at the group level, there was still considerable inter-individual variability, with only 53% of individuals meeting response criteria. Modulation of SICI did not differ between conditions.\n\nConclusionsThe interval duration between spaced iTBS plays an important role in determining the direction of plasticity on excitatory, but not inhibitory circuits in human motor cortex. While iTBS-15 can increase the magnitude of facilitation in some individuals compared to single iTBS, this approach still suffers from high inter-individual variability.

neuroscience↗