bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Trujillo-Barreto, N.

Publications and source records attributed to Trujillo-Barreto, N..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Modeling EEG Resting-State Brain Dynamics: A proof of concept for clinical studies

Functional brain imaging has shown that the awake brain, independent of a task, spontaneously switches between a small set of functional networks. How useful this dynamical view of brain activity is for clinical studies, e.g., as early markers of subsequent structural and/or functional change or for assessing successful training or intervention effects, remains unclear. Core to addressing this question is to assess the robustness and reproducibility of the analysis methods that model, characterize, or infer the features of brain dynamics, and the accuracy by which these features represent and classify specific cognitive or altered cognitive states. This is particularly key given inter- and intra-individual variability and measurement noise. Here we used resting-state EEG from persons with Parkinsons Disease (PD) and healthy matched controls to systematically assess the reliability, robustness, and sensitivity of Hidden semi-Markov models (HsMM). These models are an example of model-based probabilistic methods for Brain-State allocations that are estimated from observed data. The method estimates model parameters, if the M/EEG recording or observations, over the scale of minutes, are emissions from hidden states that persist over short durations, before switching or transitioning to other states. We introduce an analysis pipeline that leads to sets of reproducible features of neurophysiological dynamics at the individual level. These features can be used as discriminatory variables to classify individuals and to evaluate the effect of non-pharmacological training schemes like in the current example a music-gait exercise program for Parkinsons Disease. Given the method stochasticity and the data variability, we emphasize the importance of repeating the analysis to reliably identify brain states and their dynamical trajectories that subsequently can be related to individualized variables.

neuroscience↗

Impact of brain parcellation on prediction error in models of cognition and demographics

Brain connectivity analysis begins with the selection of a parcellation scheme that will define brain regions as nodes of a network whose connections will be studied. Brain connectivity has already been used in predictive modelling of cognition, but it remains unclear if the resolution of the parcellation used can systematically impact the predictive model performance. In this work, structural, functional and combined connectivity were each defined with 5 different parcellation schemes. The resolution and modality of the parcellation schemes were varied. Each connectivity defined with each parcellation was used to predict individual differences in age, education, sex, Executive Function, Self-regulation, Language, Encoding and Sequence Processing. It was found that low-resolution functional parcellation consistently performed above chance at producing generalisable models of both demographics and cognition. However, no single parcellation scheme proved superior at predictive modelling across all cognitive domains and demographics. In addition, although parcellation schemes impacted the global organisation of each connectivity type, this difference could not account for the out-of-sample prediction performance of the models. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that while high-resolution parcellations may be beneficial for modelling specific individual differences, partial voluming of signals produced by higher resolution of parcellation likely disrupts model generalisability.

neuroscience↗

Efficient estimation of time-dependent functional connectivity using Structural Connectivity constraints

Multivariate autoregressive models [MAR] allows estimating effective brain connectivity by considering both power and phase fluctuations of the signals involved. A MAR models brain activity in one region as a linear combination of past activations in all other regions. A Hidden Markov model, HMM, whose states emisions are drawn from state-specific MARs, can then be used to model fast switching of effective brain connectivity over time. However, the large number of MAR parameters, impede the accurate and efficient estimation of such models from neuroimaging timeseries with limited length. We propose a new model for inferring time-dependent effective brain connectivity by using a sparse MAR parameterisation to model the states emisions of a Hidden Semi-Markov Model, HsMM-MAR-AC. The sparse MAR model parameters are restricted by Anatomical Connectivity information in two ways: direct effective connectivity between two regions is only considered if the corresponding structural link/connection exists; and the time-lag associated with each direct connection is computed based on the average fibre length between the two regions, such that only one lag per connection is estimated. We simulated ground truth time-dependent brain connectivity states by generating time-series of 4 to 10 minutes sampled at 5ms, from switching Resting State Networks with a reference structural connectivity, and evaluated the accuracy of the new model in recovering the simulated Brain connectivity States against different levels of connectivity thresholding above and below the reference. We show that even when restricting the MAR to half of the reference connections, the model was able to recover the number of brain states, the associated connectivity features and their dynamics, with as little data as 4 mins. More relaxed structural connectivity thresholds required longer data to estimate the model accurately, and became computationally unfeasible without anatomical restrictions. HsMM-MAR-AC offers an efficient algorithm for estimating time-depend Effective Connectivity (tdEC) from neuroimaging data, that exploits the advantages of MAR without identifiability problems, excessive demand on data collection, or unnecessary computational complexity.

bioinformatics↗

Combination of structural and functional connectivity explains unique variation in specific domains of cognitive function.

The relationship between structural and functional brain networks has been characterised as complex: the two networks mirror each other and show mutual influence but they also diverge in their organisation. This work explored whether a combination of structural and functional connectivity can improve predictive models of cognitive performance. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was first applied to cognitive data from the Human Connectome Project to identify components reflecting five cognitive domains: Executive Function, Self-regulation, Language, Encoding and Sequence Processing. A Principal Component Regression (PCR) approach was then used to fit predictive models of each cognitive domain based on structural (SC), functional (FC) or combined structural-functional (CC) connectivity. Self-regulation, Encoding and Sequence Processing were best modelled by FC, whereas Executive Function and Language were best modelled by CC. The present study demonstrates that integrating structural and functional connectivity can help predict cognitive performance, but that the added explanatory value may be (cognitive) domain-specific. Implications of these results for studies of the brain basis of cognition in health and disease are discussed. HighlightsO_LIWe assessed the relationship between cognitive domains and structural, functional and combined structural-functional connectivity. C_LIO_LIWe found that Executive Function and Language components were best predicted by combined models of functional and structural connectivity. C_LIO_LISelf-regulation, Encoding and Sequence Processing were best predicted by functional connectivity alone. C_LIO_LIOur findings provide insight into separable contributions of functional, structural and combined connectivity to different cognitive domains. C_LI

neuroscience↗