Biology subjects

Trpevski, D.

Publications and source records attributed to Trpevski, D..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

A local inhibitory plasticity rule for control of neuronal firing rate and supralinear dendritic integration

Inhibitory synapses can control a neurons firing rate and also control supralinear dendritic integration. It is not known how inhibitory synapses can learn to perform these functions using only signals available locally at the synaptic site. We study an inhibitory plasticity rule based on the Bienenstock-Cooper-Munro theory in multicompartment models of striatal projection neurons, and show that it can perform these two functions. The rule uses local voltage-gated calcium concentration in the dendrites to regulate inhibitory synaptic strength. We show that, for rate-coded inputs, the rule can achieve precise control of neuronal firing rate after changes in excitatory input rate or excitatory synaptic strength. Additionally, for sparsely-coded inputs that activate localized synaptic clusters in dendrites, the rule can either allow or inhibit the supralinear dendritic response evoked by the clustered excitatory synapses, or equalize the dendritic response arising from different clusters. Finally, we demonstrate the use of learning to inhibit supralinear dendritic integration for solving the nonlinear feature binding problem (NFBP), in tandem with a simple excitatory plasticity rule. We conclude by discussing why the collateral inhibitory synapses between striatal projection neurons could contribute to solving the NFBP with this plasticity rule. Author summaryNeurons are the main cells in the nervous system that process information. They receive signals from the bodys senses--both external and internal--and use them to guide actions such as muscle movement and the regulation of bodily functions. A neuron becomes active when incoming signals excite it strongly enough. But for neurons to work timely, precisely, and reliably, their activity needs to be shaped, modified and controlled. This is done by inhibition, which comes from specialized inhibitory neurons. In this article we study how inhibition can learn to do two of its most basic roles in the nervous system. The first is to help neurons stay responsive across a wide range of input strengths--from very weak to very strong stimulation. For example, neurons in the retina allow vision both in dim starlight and in bright sunlight, even though these conditions differ in brightness by a trillion-fold. Inhibition contributes to handling this huge range by preventing overstimulation of the neurons in bright light. The second role of inhibition is to control strong, local excitations that occur on specific dendritic branches of a neuron. These local excitations can suddenly push a neuron into activity, and inhibition controls whether such excitations are allowed or suppressed. We use a learning mechanism that is already known to exist for excitatory synapses, but here we apply it to inhibition to explore what it could achieve. The results show that if inhibitory synapses used this same learning rule, they could support the two fundamental roles of inhibition in the nervous system described above.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2025

Opposite and complementary roles of the two calcium thresholds for inducing LTP and LTD in models of striatal projection neurons

Synaptic plasticity has been shown to occur when calcium, flowing into the synapse due to incoming stimuli, surpasses a threshold level. This threshold level is modifiable through a process called metaplasticity. Some neurons, such as the striatal projection neurons, use different sources of calcium as the signal for synaptic strengthening (long-term potentiation, LTP) or weakening (long-term depression, LTD), resulting in them having two thresholds for inducing plasticity. In this study, we show that metaplasticity enables synapses undergoing both LTP and LTD during learning to selectively express just one form of plasticity (either LTP or LTD). To show this, we use the linear and nonlinear feature binding problem (FBP and NFBP) because their input patterns share features, exposing synapses to such competing LTP and LTD processes. In particular, we identify opposite and complementary roles of metaplasticity in the two thresholds for inducing LTP and LTD: metaplasticity in one threshold (e.g. LTD) allows synaptic plasticity of the opposite type (e.g. LTP) to be properly expressed. This happens because metaplasticity in the LTD threshold protects strengthened synapses from weakening, thus allowing them to persistently increase during learning (and encode learned patterns). Similarly, metaplasticity in the LTP threhsold prevents weakened synapses from strengthening, thus allowing them to persistently decrease. Under more general conditions for triggering metaplasticity, reversal learning can also be solved, demonstrating metaplasticitys importance for solving the plasticity-stability dilemma. Finally, we show that even though a single calcium threshold is sufficient for solving the FBP, NFBP and reversal learning, two calcium thresholds allow separate control over LTP and LTD.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2024

Local, calcium- and reward-based synaptic learning rule that enhances dendritic nonlinearities can solve the nonlinear feature binding problem

This study investigates the computational potential of single striatal projection neurons (SPN), emphasizing dendritic nonlinearities and their crucial role in solving complex integration problems. Utilizing a biophysically detailed multicompartmental model of an SPN, we introduce a calcium-based, local synaptic learning rule dependent on dendritic plateau potentials. According to what is known about excitatory corticostriatal synapses, the learning rule is governed by local calcium dynamics from NMDA and L-type calcium channels and dopaminergic reward signals. In order to devise a self-adjusting learning rule, which ensures stability for individual synaptic weights, metaplasticity is also used. We demonstrate that this rule allows single neurons to solve the nonlinear feature binding problem, a task traditionally attributed to neuronal networks. We also detail an inhibitory plasticity mechanism that contributes to dendritic compartmentalization, further enhancing computational efficiency in dendrites. This in silico study highlights the computational potential of single neurons, providing deeper insights into neuronal information processing and the mechanisms by which the brain executes complex computations.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2020

A Modular Workflow for Model Building, Analysis, and Parameter Estimation in Systems Biology and Neuroscience

Neuroscience incorporates knowledge from a range of scales, from molecular dynamics to neural networks. Modeling is a valuable tool in understanding processes at a single scale or the interactions between two adjacent scales and researchers use a variety of different software tools in the model building and analysis process. While systems biology is among the more standardized fields, conversion between different model formats and interoperability between various tools is still somewhat problematic. To offer our take on tackling these shortcomings and by keeping in mind the FAIR (findability, accessibility, interoperability, reusability) data principles, we have developed a workflow for building and analyzing biochemical pathway models, using pre-existing tools that could be utilized for the storage and refinement of models in all phases of development. We have chosen the SBtab format which allows the storage of biochemical models and associated data in a single file and provides a human readable set of syntax rules. Next, we implemented custom-made MATLAB(R) scripts to perform parameter estimation and global sensitivity analysis used in model refinement. Additionally, we have developed a web-based application for biochemical models that allows simulations with either a network free solver or stochastic solvers and incorporating geometry. Finally, we illustrate convertibility and use of a biochemical model in a biophysically detailed single neuron model by running multiscale simulations in NEURON. Using this workflow, we can simulate the same model in three different simulators, with a smooth conversion between the different model formats, enhancing the characterization of different aspects of the model. Information Sharing StatementBoth the source code and documentation of the Subcellular Workflow are available at https://github.com/jpgsantos/Subcellular_Workflow and licensed under GNU General Public License v3.0. The model is stored in the SBtab format (Lubitz et al. 2016). Model reduction, parameter estimation and global sensitivity analysis tools are written in MATLAB(R) (RRID:SCR_001622) and require the SimBiology(R) toolbox. Conversion script to VFGEN (Weckesser 2008), MOD and SBML (RRID:SCR_007422) is written in R (RRID:SCR_001905). Conversion to SBML requires the use of libSBML (RRID:SCR_014134). Validations are run in COPASI (RRID:SCR_014260; Hoops et al. 2006), NEURON (RRID:SCR_005393; Hines and Carnevale 1997) and with the subcellular simulation setup application (RRID:SCR_018790; available at https://subcellular.humanbrainproject.eu/model/simulations) that uses a spatial solver provided by STEPS (RRID:SCR_008742; Hepburn et al. 2012) and network-free solver NFsim (available at http://michaelsneddon.net/nfsim/). The medium spiny neuron model (Lindroos et al. 2018) used in NEURON simulations is available in ModelDB database (RRID:SCR_007271) with access code 237653. The FindSim use case model is available in https://github.com/BhallaLab/FindSim (Viswan et al. 2018).

systems biology↗

bioRxiv2019

Regulation of adenylyl cyclase 5 in striatal neurons confers the ability to detect coincident neuromodulatory signals

Long-term potentiation and depression of synaptic activity in response to stimuli is a key factor in reinforcement learning. Strengthening of the corticostriatal synapses depends on the second messenger cAMP, whose synthesis is catalysed by the enzyme adenylyl cyclase 5 (AC5), which is itself regulated by the stimulatory Golf and inhibitory Gi proteins. AC isoforms have been suggested to act as coincidence detectors, promoting cellular responses only when convergent regulatory signals occur close in time. However, the mechanism for this is currently unclear, and seems to lie in their diverse regulation patterns. Despite attempts to isolate the ternary complex, it is not known if Golf and Gi can bind to AC5 simultaneously, nor what activity the complex would have. Using protein structure-based molecular dynamics simulations, we show that this complex is stable and inactive. These simulations, along with Brownian dynamics simulations to estimate protein association rates constants, constrain a kinetic model that shows that the presence of this ternary inactive complex is crucial for AC5s ability to detect coincident signals, producing a synergistic increase in cAMP. These results reveal some of the prerequisites for corticostriatal synaptic plasticity, and explain recent experimental data on cAMP concentrations following receptor activation. Moreover, they provide insights into the regulatory mechanisms that control signal processing by different AC isoforms.\n\nAuthor summaryAdenylyl cyclases (ACs) are enzymes that can translate extracellular signals into the intracellular molecule cAMP, which is thus a 2nd messenger of extracellular events. The brain expresses nine membrane-bound AC variants, and AC5 is the dominant form in the striatum. The striatum is the input stage of the basal ganglia, a brain structure involved in reward learning, i.e. the learning of behaviors that lead to rewarding stimuli (such as food, water, sugar, etc). During reward learning, cAMP production is crucial for strengthening the synapses from cortical neurons onto the striatal principal neurons, and its formation is dependent on several neuromodulatory systems such as dopamine and acetylcholine. It is, however, not understood how AC5 is activated by transient (subsecond) changes in the neuromodulatory signals. Here we combine several computational tools, from molecular dynamics and Brownian dynamics simulations to bioinformatics approaches, to inform and constrain a kinetic model of the AC5-dependent signaling system. We use this model to show how the specific molecular properties of AC5 can detect particular combinations of co-occuring transient changes in the neuromodulatory signals which thus result in a supralinear/synergistic cAMP production. Our results also provide insights into the computational capabilities of the different AC isoforms.

neuroscience↗