Biology subjects

Troester, M. A.

Publications and source records attributed to Troester, M. A..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2023

Diffsig: Associating Risk Factors With Mutational Signatures

Somatic mutational signatures elucidate molecular vulnerabilities to therapy and therefore detecting signatures and classifying tumors with respect to signatures has clinical value. However, identifying the etiology of the mutational signatures remains a statistical challenge, with both small sample sizes and high variability in classification algorithms posing barriers. As a result, few signatures have been strongly linked to particular risk factors. Here we present Diffsig, a model and R package for estimating the association of risk factors with mutational signatures, suggesting etiologies for the pre-defined mutational signatures. Diffsig is a Bayesian Dirichlet-multinomial hierarchical model that allows testing of any type of risk factor while taking into account the uncertainty associated with samples with a low number of observations. In simulation, we found that our method can accurately estimate risk factor-mutational signal associations. We applied Diffsig to breast cancer data to assess relationships between five established breast-relevant mutational signatures and etiologic variables, confirming known mechanisms of cancer development. Diffsig is implemented as an R package available at: https://github.com/jennprk/diffsig.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2021

APOBEC mutagenesis inhibits breast cancer growth through induction of a T cell-mediated antitumor immune response

The APOBEC family of cytidine deaminases is one of the most common endogenous sources of mutations in human cancer. Genomic studies of tumors have found that APOBEC mutational signatures are particularly enriched in the HER2 subtype of breast cancer and have been associated with immunotherapy response in diverse cancer types. However, the direct consequences of APOBEC mutagenesis on the tumor immune microenvironment have not been thoroughly investigated. To address this, we developed syngeneic murine mammary tumor models with inducible expression of APOBEC3B. We found that APOBEC activity induces an antitumor adaptive immune response and CD4+ T cell-mediated tumor growth inhibition. While polyclonal APOBEC tumors had a moderate growth defect, clonal APOBEC tumors were almost completely rejected by the immune system, suggesting that APOBEC-mediated genetic heterogeneity limits the antitumor adaptive immune response. Consistent with the observed immune infiltration in APOBEC tumors, APOBEC activity sensitized HER2-driven breast tumors to checkpoint inhibition. In human breast cancers, the relationship between APOBEC mutagenesis and immunogenicity varied by breast cancer subtype and the frequency of subclonal mutations. This work provides a mechanistic basis for the sensitivity of APOBEC tumors to checkpoint inhibitors and suggests a rationale for using APOBEC mutational signatures as a biomarker predicting immunotherapy response in HER2-positive breast cancers. SIGNIFICANCEAPOBEC mutational signatures are observed in many cancers, yet the consequences of these mutations on the tumor immune microenvironment are not well understood. Using a novel mouse model, we show that APOBEC activity sensitizes HER2-driven mammary tumors to checkpoint inhibition and could inform immunotherapy treatment strategies for HER2-positive breast cancer patients.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2020

DeCompress: tissue compartment deconvolution of targeted mRNA expression panels using compressed sensing

Targeted mRNA expression panels, measuring up to 800 genes, are used in academic and clinical settings due to low cost and high sensitivity for archived samples. Most samples assayed on targeted panels originate from bulk tissue comprised of many cell types, and cell-type heterogeneity confounds biological signals. Reference-free methods are used when cell-type-specific expression references are unavailable, but limited feature spaces render implementation challenging in targeted panels. Here, we present DeCompress, a semi-reference-free deconvolution method for targeted panels. DeCompress leverages a reference RNA-seq or microarray dataset from similar tissue to expand the feature space of targeted panels using compressed sensing. Ensemble reference-free deconvolution is performed on this artificially expanded dataset to estimate cell-type proportions and gene signatures. In simulated mixtures, four public cell line mixtures, and a targeted panel (1199 samples; 406 genes) from the Carolina Breast Cancer Study, DeCompress recapitulates cell-type proportions with less error than reference-free methods and finds biologically relevant compartments. We integrate compartment estimates into cis-eQTL mapping in breast cancer, identifying a tumor-specific cis-eQTL for CCR3 (C-C Motif Chemokine Receptor 3) at a risk locus. DeCompress improves upon reference-free methods without requiring expression profiles from pure cell populations, with applications in genomic analyses and clinical settings.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2020

An approach for normalization and quality control for NanoString RNA expression data

The NanoString RNA counting assay for formalin-fixed paraffin embedded samples is unique in its sensitivity, technical reproducibility, and robustness for analysis of clinical and archival samples. While commercial normalization methods are provided by NanoString, they are not optimal for all settings, particularly when samples exhibit strong technical or biological variation or where housekeeping genes have variable performance across the cohort. Here, we develop and evaluate a more comprehensive normalization procedure for NanoString data with steps for quality control, selection of housekeeping targets, normalization, and iterative data visualization and biological validation. The approach was evaluated using a large cohort (N = 1,649) from the Carolina Breast Cancer Study, two cohorts of moderate sample size (N = 359 and 130), and a small published dataset (N = 12). The iterative process developed here eliminates technical variation (e.g. from different study phases or sites) more reliably than the three other methods, including NanoStrings commercial package, without diminishing biological variation, especially in long-term longitudinal multi-phase or multi-site cohorts. We also find that probe sets validated for nCounter, such as the PAM50 gene signature, are impervious to batch issues. This work emphasizes that systematic quality control, normalization, and visualization of NanoString nCounter data is an imperative component of study design that influences results in downstream analyses.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2019

A framework for transcriptome-wide association studies in breast cancer in diverse study populations

BackgroundThe relationship between germline genetic variation and breast cancer survival is largely unknown, especially in understudied minority populations who often have poorer survival. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have interrogated breast cancer survival but often are underpowered due to subtype heterogeneity and many clinical covariates and detect loci in non-coding regions that are difficult to interpret. Transcriptome-wide association studies (TWAS) show increased power in detecting functionally-relevant loci by leveraging expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) from external reference panels in relevant tissues. However, ancestry- or race-specific reference panels may be needed to draw correct inference in ancestrally-diverse cohorts. Such panels for breast cancer are lacking.\n\nResultsWe provide a framework for TWAS for breast cancer in diverse populations, using data from the Carolina Breast Cancer Study (CBCS), a North Carolina population-based cohort that oversampled black women. We perform eQTL analysis for 406 breast cancer-related genes to train race-stratified predictive models of tumor expression from germline genotypes. Using these models, we impute expression in independent data from CBCS and TCGA, accounting for sampling variability in assessing performance. These models are not applicable across race, and their predictive performance varies across tumor subtype. Within CBCS (N = 3,828), at a false discovery-adjusted significance of 0.10 and stratifying for race, we identify associations in black women near AURKA, CAPN13, PIK3CA, and SERPINB5 via TWAS that are underpowered in GWAS.\n\nConclusionsWe show that carefully implemented and thoroughly validated TWAS is an efficient approach for understanding the genetics underpinning breast cancer outcomes in diverse populations.

cancer biology↗