bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Trkulja, V.

Publications and source records attributed to Trkulja, V..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Ethical Considerations of Mitigating Data Loss: VLADISLAV, a Manifesto for Reliable Home Cage Systems

Home cage monitoring (HCM) captures longitudinal animal behavioural data without human intervention. However, the systems complexity is rarely addressed in their design, increasing the risk of data loss, which wastes workhours, resources, and animal lives. To assess the feasibility of implementing modern, robust architectures in complex operant HCM paradigms, the VersatiLe Autonomous DevIce for Scheduled Learning Assessment Via Wi-Fi (VLADISLAV) was developed and employed to test cognitive deficits in the intracerebroventricular streptozotocin-induced rat model of sporadic Alzheimers disease (sAD). Reliability was modelled against a system architecture common in commercial HCM systems by modelling the failure rate of the devices critical components across typical durations of animal experiments. VLADISLAV assessed multiple cognitive dimensions of a rat model of sAD with automated, scheduled testing. Its design enabled simultaneous, redundant recording to multiple devices in real time, as well as batch remote control and supervision of tens of VLADISLAVs. VLADISLAV is estimated to reduce component failure rate [~]200-fold at {euro}40/device. Data loss due to system failure shouldnt be accepted as a normal occurrence and robust system design is an ethical imperative. VLADISLAVs robustness and utility demonstrate the potential of embedded networked systems, used in other industries and consumer electronics for over a decade. Today, the open source ecosystem enables cost-effective implementation of such architectures in HCM by biomedical researchers with no electronic engineering education, preventing data loss and facilitating researchers and technicians day-to-day work. Considering these findings, it is apparent that the implementation of modern architectures in HCM is long overdue.

animal behavior and cognition↗

MIROSLAV: A complete open-source hardware and software toolkit for high-throughput circadian activity measurement and analysis in rodents

While conventional behavioural tests offer valuable insight into rodent behaviour in specific paradigms, rodents spend most of their time in a safe, undisturbed environment - their home cage. However, home cage monitoring (HCM) is often impractical at scale over prolonged periods of time without significant loss of data. To achieve this, we developed MIROSLAV, the Multicage InfraRed Open Source Locomotor Activity eValuator, a home cage activity and environmental monitoring device designed to be open, adaptable, and robust. Its transparent and modular design allows the device to be tailored to varying experimental requirements and environmental conditions, while its wireless operation and multiple redundancies minimise loss of data and animal disturbance. Data quality is maintained by a modular software workflow for data preparation (Prepare-a-SLAV) and cleaning (TidySLAV), followed by exploratory (MIROSine - MIRO The Explorer) and statistical (MIROSine - StatistiSLAV) analysis of circadian periodicity. Here, using MIROSLAV, we demonstrate circadian dysrhythmia and a disrupted response to regular stimuli (e.g. behavioural testing, bedding change) in a rat model of sporadic Alzheimers disease, showcasing MIROSLAVs utility in a typical animal study of disease. In accordance with the 3Rs, every rodent study and laboratory performing them can benefit from HCM, provided the existence of transparent and customisable tools which allow robust deployment to tens or hundreds of cages in various conditions. MIROSLAV provides this opportunity to researchers in a cost-effective manner.

animal behavior and cognition↗

Publishing of COVID-19 Preprints in Peer-reviewed Journals, Preprinting Trends, Public Discussion and Quality Issues

IntroductionCOVID-19-related (vs. non-related) articles appear to be more expeditiously processed and published in peer-reviewed journals. We aimed to evaluate: (i) whether COVID-19-related preprints were favored for publication, (ii) preprinting trends and public discussion of the preprints, and (iii) the relationship between the publication topic (COVID-19-related or not) and quality issues. MethodsManuscripts deposited at bioRxiv and medRxiv between January 1 and September 27 were assessed for the probability of publishing in peer-reviewed journals, and those published were evaluated for submission-to-acceptance time. The extent of public discussion was assessed based on Altmetric and Disqus data. The Retraction Watch Database and PubMed were used to explore the retraction of COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 articles and preprints. ResultsWith adjustment for the preprinting server and number of deposited versions, COVID-19-related preprints were more likely to be published within 120 days since the deposition of the first version (OR=2.04, 95%CI 1.87-2.23) as well as over the entire observed period (OR=1.42, 95%CI 1.33-1.52). Submission-to-acceptance was by 38.67 days (95%CI 34.96-42.39) shorter for COVID-19 articles. Public discussion of preprints was modest and COVID-19 articles were overrepresented in the pool of retracted articles in 2020. ConclusionCurrent data suggest a preference for publication of COVID-19-related preprints over the observed period.

scientific communication and education↗