bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Trejo, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Trejo, S..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Morphogen-guided neocortical organoids recapitulate regional areal identity and model neurodevelopmental disorder pathology

The human neocortex exhibits characteristic regional patterning (arealization) critical for higher-order cognitive function. Disrupted arealization is strongly implicated in neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), but current neocortical organoid models largely fail to recapitulate this patterning, limiting mechanistic understanding. Here, we establish a straightforward method for generating arealized organoids through short-term early exposure to anterior (FGF8) or posterior (BMP4/CHIR-99021) morphogens. These treatments created distinct anterior and posterior signaling centers, supporting long-lasting polarization, which we validated with single-cell RNA sequencing that revealed area-specific molecular signatures matching prenatal human cortex. To demonstrate the utility of this platform, we modeled Fragile X Syndrome (FXS) in organoids with distinct anterior and posterior regional identities. FXS organoids showed highly disrupted SOX4/SOX11 expression gradients along the anterior-posterior axis, consistent with alterations found in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and demonstrate how regional patterning defects may contribute to NDD pathology. Together, our study provides a robust platform for generating neocortical organoids with anterior-posterior molecular signatures and highlights the importance of modeling NDDs using experimental platforms with neuroanatomic specificity.

developmental biology↗

Does standard adjustment for genomic population structure capture direct genetic effects?

Contemporary genomic studies of complex traits, such as genome-wide association studies (GWASs) and polygenic index (PGI) analyses, often use the principal components of the genotype matrix (PCs) to adjust for population stratification. In this paper, we explore the extent to which we may be discounting direct genetic effects by adjusting for PCs. Using family-based models that control for parental genotype (obtained via Mendelian imputation), we test whether PCs have a direct genetic effect on nine complex phenotypes in the White British subsample of the UK Biobank. Further, we assess the extent to which estimates of polygenic effects meaningfully change when adjusting for PCs in within-family models. Across the nine traits, within-family effects of the top 40 PCs are highly similar to their population effects, suggesting that standard PC adjustments diminish, albeit to a small degree, detectable signals of direct genetic effects. Within family models also confirm that PCs have significant marginal effects on a few traits, most consistently, height and educational attainment. Nonetheless, the variance explained by the effects of PCs is modest, and adjusting for PCs does not appear to affect the magnitude and significance of PGI effects in within-family models.

genomics↗

Heteroscedastic regression modeling elucidates gene-by-environment interaction

Genotype-by-environment interaction (GxE) occurs when the size of a genetic effect varies systematically across levels of the environment and when the size of an environmental effect varies systematically across levels of the genotype. However, total variance in the phenotype may shift as a function of the moderator irrespective of its etiology such that the proportional effect of the predictor is constant. We expand the traditional GxE regression model to directly account for heteroscedasticity associated with both the genotype and the measured environment. We then derive a test statistic,{xi} , for inferring whether GxE can be attributed to an effect of the moderator on the dispersion of the phenotype. We apply this method to identify genotype-by-birth year interactions for Body Mass Index (BMI) that are distinguishable from general secular increases in the variance of BMI or associations of the genetic predictors (both PGS and individual loci) with BMI variance. We provide software for analyzing such models.

genetics↗

Genetic Nature or Genetic Nurture? Quantifying Bias in Analyses Using Polygenic Scores

Summary statistics from a genome-wide association study (GWAS) can be used to generate a polygenic score (PGS). For complex, behavioral traits, the correlation between an individuals PGS and their phenotype may contain bias alongside the causal effect of the individuals genes (due to geographic, ancestral, and/or socioeconomic confounding). We formalize the recent introduction of a different source of bias in regression models using PGSs: the effects of parental genes on offspring outcomes, also known as genetic nurture. GWAS do not discriminate between the various pathways through which genes influence outcomes, meaning existing PGSs capture both direct genetic effects and genetic nurture effects. We construct a theoretical model for genetic effects and show that, unlike other sources of bias in PGSs, the presence of genetic nurture biases PGS coefficients from both naive OLS (between-family) and family fixed effects (within-family) regressions. This bias is in opposite directions; while naive OLS estimates are biased upwards, family fixed effects estimates are biased downwards. We quantify this bias for a given trait using two novel parameters that we identify and discuss: (1) the genetic correlation between the direct and nurture effects and (2) the ratio of the SNP heritabilities for the direct and nurture effects.

genomics↗