bioRxiv ScienceSearch

Biology subjects

Traylor, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Traylor, M..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

The Subtype Specificity of Genetic Loci Associated with Stroke in 16,664 cases and 32,792 controls

BackgroundGenome-wide association studies have identified multiple loci associated with stroke. However, the specific stroke subtypes affected, and whether loci influence both ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke, remains unknown. For loci associated with stroke, we aimed to infer the combination of stroke subtypes likely to be affected, and in doing so assess the extent to which such loci have homogeneous effects across stroke subtypes.\n\nMethodsWe performed Bayesian multinomial regression in 16,664 stroke cases and 32,792 controls of European ancestry to determine the most likely combination of stroke subtypes affected for loci with published genome-wide stroke associations, using model selection. Cases were subtyped under two commonly used stroke classification systems, Trial of Org 10172 Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) and Causative Classification of Stroke (CCS). All individuals had genotypes imputed to the Haplotype Reference Consortium 1.1 Panel.\n\nResultsSixteen loci were considered for analysis. Seven loci influenced both haemorrhagic and ischaemic stroke, three of which influenced ischaemic and haemorrhagic subtypes under both TOAST and CCS. Under CCS, 4 loci influenced both small vessel stroke and intracerebral haemorrhage. An EDNRA locus demonstrated opposing effects on ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke. No loci were predicted to influence all stroke subtypes in the same direction and only one locus (12q24) was predicted to influence all ischaemic stroke subtypes.\n\nConclusionsHeterogeneity in the influence of stroke-associated loci on stroke subtypes is pervasive, reflecting differing causal pathways. However, overlap exists between haemorrhagic and ischaemic stroke, which may reflect shared pathobiology predisposing to small vessel arteriopathy. Stroke is a complex, heterogeneous disorder requiring tailored analytic strategies to decipher genetic mechanisms.

genetics

Predictors of intestinal inflammation in asymptomatic first-degree relatives of patients with Crohn’s disease

ObjectiveRelatives of individuals with Crohns disease (CD) carry an increased number of CD-associated genetic variants and are at increased risk of developing the disease. Multiple environmental and genetic factors contribute to this increased risk. We aimed to estimate the utility of genotype, smoking, family history, and a panel of biomarkers to predict risk in asymptomatic first-degree relatives (FDRs) of CD patients.\n\nDesignWe calculated a combined genotype (72 CD-associated genetic markers) and smoking relative risk score in 454 FDRs, and performed capsule endoscopy and collected 22 biomarkers in individuals from the highest and lowest risk quartiles. We then predicted small intestinal inflammation using genetic risk score, smoking status, number of relatives with CD, capsule transit time, and the panel of biomarkers in 124 individuals with complete data. Our principal analysis was to calculate the predictive utility from two machine learning classifiers: an elastic net and a random forest.\n\nResultsBoth classifiers successfully predicted FDRs with intestinal inflammation: elastic net (AUC=0.80, 95% CI: 0.62-0.98), random forest (AUC=0.87, 95% CI: 0.75-1.00). The elastic net selected a 3-predictor solution: CD family history (OR=1.31), genetic risk score (OR=1.14), and faecal calprotectin (OR=1.04). The same 3 variables were among the top 5 most important predictors as ranked by the random forest.\n\nConclusionA readily collectable panel of genetic risk variants, added to family history and faecal calprotectin, predicts those at greatest risk for developing CD with a good degree of accuracy.

epidemiology

ukbtools: An R package to manage and query UK Biobank data

SummaryThe UK Biobank is a resource that includes detailed health-related data on about 500,000 individuals and is available to the research community. ukbtools removes all the upfront data wrangling required to get a single dataset for statistical analysis, and provides tools to assist in quality control, query of disease diagnoses, and retrieval of genetic metadata.\n\nAvailabilityThe package is available for installation from the Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN), and includes a vignette describing the use of all functionality.\n\nContact ken.b.hanscombe@kcl.ac.uk, https://github.com/kenhanscombe/ukbtools

epidemiology

Pharmacogenetic testing through the direct-to-consumer genetic testing company 23andMe

BackgroundRapid advances in scientific research have led to an increase in public awareness of genetic testing and pharmacogenetics. Direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing companies, such as 23andMe, allow consumers to access their genetic information directly through an online service without the involvement of healthcare professionals. Here, we evaluate the clinical relevance of such pharmacogenetic tests reported by 23andMe.\n\nMethodsThe research papers listed under each 23andMe report were evaluated, extracting information on effect size, sample size and ethnicity. A wider literature search was performed to provide a fuller assessment of the pharmacogenetic test and variants were matched to FDA recommendations. Additional evidence from CPIC guidelines, PharmGKB, and Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group was reviewed to determine current clinical practice. The value of the tests across ethnic groups was determined, including information on linkage disequilibrium between the tested SNP and causal pharmacogenetic variant, where relevant.\n\nResults23andMe offers 12 pharmacogenetic tests, some of which are in standard clinical practice, and others which are less widely applied. The clinical validity and clinical utility varies extensively between tests. The variants tested are likely to have different degrees of sensitivity due to different risk allele frequencies and linkage disequilibrium patterns across populations. The clinical relevance depends on the ethnicity of the individual and variability of pharmacogenetic markers. Further research is required to determine causal variants and provide more complete assessment of drug response and side effects.\n\nConclusion23andMe reports provide some useful pharmacogenetics information, mirroring clinical tests that are in standard use. Other tests are unspecific, providing limited guidance and may not be useful for patients without professional interpretation. Nevertheless, DTC companies like 23andMe act as a powerful intermediate step to integrate pharmacogenetic testing into clinical practice.

genetics