bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Travers, S. P.

Publications and source records attributed to Travers, S. P..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

A T1R-independent mechanism for responses to hyperosmotic sugars involves a carbonic anhydrase-sensitive mechanism in Type III receptor cells

Recent findings from our laboratory demonstrated that the rostral nucleus of solitary tract (rNST) retains some responsiveness to glutamate (MSG+amiloride-MSGa) and sugars in mice lacking the canonical T1R receptors for these tastants. Here, we recorded from the parabrachial nucleus (PBN) in mice lacking the T1R1+T1R3 heterodimer (KO1+3), using warm stimuli to optimize sugar responses and employing extended concentrations and pharmacological agents to probe mechanisms. MSGa+IMP responses were not synergized in KO1+3 mice but responses to MSGa were similar to those in B6 (WT) mice. Glutamate responses in the neurons tested were unaffected by topical application of an mGluR4 antagonist. PBN T1R-independent sugar responses, including those to concentrated glucose, were more evident than in rNST. Sugar responses were undiminished by phlorizin, an inhibitor of SGLT, a component of a hypothesized alternative glucose-sensing mechanism. There were no sugar/umami "best" neurons in KO1+3 mice, and instead, sugars activated cells that displayed acid and amiloride-insensitive NaCl responses. In WTs, concentrated sugars activated "sugar/umami" cells but also electrolyte-sensitive neurons. The efficacy of hyperosmotic sugars for driving neurons broadly responsive to electrolytes implied an origin from Type III taste bud cells. To test this, we used the carbonic anhydrase (CA) inhibitor dorzolamide (DRZ), previously shown to inhibit amiloride-insensitive sodium responses arising from Type III cells. Dorzolamide had no effect on sugarelicited responses in WT sugar/umami PBN neurons but strongly suppressed them in WT and KO electrolyte-generalist neurons. These findings suggest a novel T1R-independent mechanism for hyperosmotic sugars, involving a CA-dependent mechanism in Type-III taste bud cells. Significance StatementSince the discovery of the Tas1r gene family that encodes receptors that lead to sweet and umami taste perception two decades ago, evidence has accrued that mice lacking these receptors maintain some degree of behavioral, physiological, and neural responsiveness to sugars and monosodium glutamate. But the basis for the remaining sensitivity to these nutritionally relevant compounds has remained elusive. Here we recorded from parabrachial nucleus taste neurons. Glutamate responses in mice lacking T1R1+T1R3 were unaffected by oral treatment of mGluR4 receptor antagonist suggesting that some T1R-independent glutamate responses are mediated by a different transduction pathway. Moreover, we identified a novel basis for T1R-independent responsiveness to hyperosmotic sugars that relies on carbonic anhydrase-mediated mechanism found in Type III taste bud cells.

neuroscience↗

GABA and IA Independently Regulate rNST Responses to Afferent Input

Taste responses in the rostral nucleus of the solitary tract (rNST) influence motivated ingestive behavior via ascending pathways, and consummatory reflex behavior via local, brainstem connections. Modifications to the afferent signal within the rNST include changes in gain (the overall rate of neuron activity) and changes in gustatory tuning (the degree to which individual neurons respond to divergent gustatory qualities). These alterations of the sensory signal derive from both synaptic interactions within the nucleus and the constitutive cellular membrane properties of rNST neurons. GABA neurons are well represented within the rNST, as is expression of KV4.3, a channel for a rapidly inactivating outward K+ current (IA). GABAergic synapses suppress rNST responses to afferent input and previous studies showed that this suppression is greater in cells expressing IA, suggesting a possible interaction. Here, we examine the potential interaction between GABAergic inhibition and IA channels in a series of patch clamp experiments. Optogenetic release of GABA suppressed rNST responses to afferent (electrical) stimulation and this effect was greater in cells with IA, confirming an earlier report. We further observed that the composite inhibitory postsynaptic potential was larger in IA positive cells, suggesting one mechanism for the greater afferent suppression. Blocking IA with the channel blocker AmmTX3, enhanced the response to afferent stimulation, suggesting a suppressive role for this channel in regulating afferent input at rest. However, pharmacologic blockade of IA did not suppress GABAergic inhibition, indicating that IA and GABA independently regulate excitatory afferent input.

neuroscience↗