An innovative approach in identifying a network of priority wetland sites in the East Asian-Australasian Flyway for a new sustainable management investment programme
The East Asian-Australasian Flyway (EAAF) is widely recognised to be the most threatened of the eight flyways in the world, with wetlands rapidly lost due to land cover change, unsustainable use, and the wider impacts of climate change. The recently established Regional Flyway Initiative aims to bring a network of priority wetlands in the EAAF under improved protection, management, and restoration in 10 Asian countries, while mobilising resources for sustainable agriculture, aquaculture, ecotourism, and other livelihoods for local communities. A major step in the development of this initiative is the identification of priority wetland sites through the application of international criteria, based on modern waterbird count data collated from wetland sites across Asia. Through existing analyses and stakeholder consultations, we short-listed 400 internationally important wetlands as candidate sites for further assessment. Count data of EAAF waterbird species was then assessed against international criteria aligned with the Convention on Wetlands (Ramsar Convention), the EAAF Partnerships Flyway Site Network and Important Bird Areas and Biodiversity for each site to iteratively identify a subset of priority sites, drawing on newly available species population thresholds. Each site was scored and ranked using a metric (Prioritisation Criterion1) calculated from the proportions of every occurring EAAF species against published population thresholds. We identified a total of 147 wetland sites of high conservation priority across the 10 countries, thereby representing the full suite of wetland landscapes and habitats in Asia, both freshwater and coastal, all critical sites for the conservation of migratory waterbirds in the flyway. At least 34 threatened species, including significant proportions of their global populations are represented in this network of 147 sites. To ensure that conservation opportunities are maximised for species and ecosystem services, there is a need to ensure that selected sites and landscapes are reconciled with the conservation and development priorities of each country, and to evaluate priority sites for their ecosystem services.