Toselli, B. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2023

The influence of inter-regional delays in generating large-scale brain networks of phase synchronization

Large-scale networks of phase synchronization are considered to regulate the communication between brain regions fundamental to cognitive function, but the mapping to their structural substrates, i.e., the structure-function relationship, remains poorly understood. Biophysical Network Models (BNMs) have demonstrated the influences of local oscillatory activity and inter-regional anatomical connections in generating alpha-band (8-12 Hz) networks of phase synchronization observed with Electroencephalography (EEG) and Magnetoencephalography (MEG). Yet, the influence of inter-regional conduction delays remains unknown. In this study, we compared a BNM with standard "distance-dependent delays", which assumes constant conduction velocity, to BNMs with delays specified by two alternative methods accounting for spatially varying conduction velocities, "isochronous delays" and "mixed delays". We followed the Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) workflow, i) specifying neurophysiologically informed prior distributions of BNM parameters, ii) verifying the suitability of the prior distributions with Prior Predictive Checks, iii) fitting each of the three BNMs to alpha-band MEG resting-state data (N = 75) with Bayesian Optimisation for Likelihood-Free Inference (BOLFI), and iv) choosing between the fitted BNMs with ABC model comparison on a separate MEG dataset (N = 30). Prior Predictive Checks revealed the range of dynamics generated by each of the BNMs to encompass those seen in the MEG data, suggesting the suitability of the prior distributions. Fitting the models to MEG data yielded reliable posterior distributions of the parameters of each of the BNMs. Finally, model comparison revealed the BNM with "distance-dependent delays", as the most probable to describe the generation of alpha-band networks of phase synchronization seen in MEG. These findings suggest that distance-dependent delays contribute significantly to the neocortical architecture of human alpha-band networks of phase synchronization. Hence, our study illuminates the role of inter-regional delays in generating the large-scale networks of phase synchronization that might subserve the communication between regions vital to cognition. HighlightsO_LICompared methods to specify delays in Biophysical Network Models (BNMs) C_LIO_LIBNM with "distance-dependent" conduction delays more probable than alternatives C_LIO_LIBNMs with biologically informed prior distributions generate dynamics seen in MEG C_LIO_LIFitting BNMs yields reliable posterior distributions informed by MEG data (N = 75) C_LI

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2021

Biophysical network models of phase-synchronization in MEG resting-state

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is used extensively to study functional connectivity (FC) networks of phase-synchronization, but the relationship of these networks to their biophysical substrates is poorly understood. Biophysical Network Models (BNMs) have been used to produce networks corresponding to MEG-derived networks of phase-synchronization, but the roles of inter-regional conduction delays, the structural connectome and dynamics of model of individual brain regions, in obtaining this correspondence remain unknown. In this study, we investigated the roles of conduction delays, the structural connectome, and dynamics of models of individual regions, in obtaining a correspondence between model-generated and MEG-derived networks between left-hemispheric regions. To do this, we compared three BNMs, respectively comprising Wilson-Cowan oscillators interacting with diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-based patterns of structural connections through zero delays, constant delays and distance-dependent delays respectively. For the BNM whose networks corresponded most closely to the MEG-derived network, we used comparisons against null models to identify specific features of each model component, e.g. the pattern of connections in the structure connectome, that contributed to the observed correspondence. The Wilson-Cowan zero delays model produced networks with a closer correspondence to the MEG-derived network than those produced by the constant delays model, and the same as those produced by the distance-dependent delays model. Hence, there is no evidence that including conduction delays improves the correspondence between model-generated and MEG-derived networks. Given this, we chose the Wilson-Cowan zero delays model for further investigation. Comparing the Wilson-Cowan zero delays model against null models revealed that both the pattern of structural connections and Wilson-Cowan oscillatory dynamics contribute to the correspondence between model-generated and MEG-derived networks. Our investigations yield insight into the roles of conduction delays, the structural connectome and dynamics of models of individual brain regions, in obtaining a correspondence between model-generated and MEG-derived networks. These findings result in a parsimonious BNM that produces networks corresponding closely to MEG-derived networks of phase-synchronization. HighlightsO_LISimple biophysical model produces close match ({rho}=0.49) between model and MEG networks C_LIO_LINo evidence for conduction delays improving match between model and MEG networks C_LIO_LIPattern of structural connections contributes to match between model and MEG networks C_LIO_LIWilson-Cowan oscillatory dynamics contribute to match between model and MEG networks C_LI

neuroscience↗