bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Torchetti, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Torchetti, M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

One Health Investigation of SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Seropositivity among Pets in Households with Confirmed Human COVID-19 Cases - Utah and Wisconsin, 2020

BackgroundApproximately 67% of U.S. households have pets. Limited data are available on SARS-CoV-2 in pets. We assessed SARS-CoV-2 infection in pet cohabitants as a sub-study of an ongoing COVID-19 household transmission investigation. MethodsMammalian pets from households with [≥]1 person with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 were eligible for inclusion from April-May 2020. Demographic/exposure information, oropharyngeal, nasal, rectal, and fur swabs, feces, and blood were collected from enrolled pets and tested by rRT-PCR and virus neutralization assays. FindingsWe enrolled 37 dogs and 19 cats from 34 of 41 eligible households. All oropharyngeal, nasal, and rectal swabs tested negative by rRT-PCR; one dogs fur swabs (2%) tested positive by rRT-PCR at the first animal sampling. Among 47 pets with serological results from 30 households, eight (17%) pets (4 dogs, 4 cats) from 6 (20%) households had detectable SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies. In households with a seropositive pet, the proportion of people with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 was greater (median 79%; range: 40-100%) compared to households with no seropositive pet (median 37%; range: 13-100%) (p=0.01). Thirty-three pets with serologic results had frequent daily contact ([≥]1 hour) with the human index patient before the persons COVID-19 diagnosis. Of these 33 pets, 14 (42%) had decreased contact with the human index patient after diagnosis and none (0%) were seropositive; of the 19 (58%) pets with continued contact, 4 (21%) were seropositive. InterpretationsSeropositive pets likely acquired infection from humans, which may occur more frequently than previously recognized. People with COVID-19 should restrict contact with animals. FundingCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Agriculture

microbiology↗

Tissue tropisms of avian influenza A viruses affect their spillovers from wild birds to pigs

Wild aquatic birds maintain a large genetically diverse pool of influenza A viruses (IAVs), which can be transmitted to lower mammals and ultimately humans. Through phenotypic analyses, only a small set of avian IAVs replicated well in the epithelial cells of swine upper respiratory tracts, and these viruses were shown to infect and cause virus shedding in pigs. Such a phenotypic trait appears to emerge randomly and are distributed among IAVs across multiple avian species, geographic and temporal orders, and is determined not by receptor binding preference but other markers across genomic segments, such as those in the ribonucleoprotein complex. This study demonstrates that phenotypic variants exist among avian IAVs, only a few of which may result in viral shedding in pigs upon infection, providing opportunities for these viruses to become pig adapted, thus posing a higher potential risk for creating novel variants or detrimental reassortants within pig populations. Author SummaryHaving both avian-like receptors and human-like 2,6-linked sialic acid receptors, swine serve as a "mixing vessel" for generating human influenza pandemic strains. All HA subtypes of IAVs can infect swine; however, only sporadic cases of avian IAVs are reported in domestic swine. The molecular mechanisms affecting avian IAVs ability to infect swine are still not fully understood. Through phenotypic analyses, this study suggested that tissue tropisms (i.e., in swine upper respiratory tracts) of avian IAVs affect their spillovers from wild birds to pigs, and this phenotype was determined not by receptor binding preference but by other markers across genomic segments, such as those in the ribonucleoprotein complex. In addition, our results showed that such a phenotypic trait was sporadically and randomly distributed among IAVs across multiple avian species, geographic and temporal orders. This study suggested an efficient way for risk assessment of avian IAVs, such as in evaluating their potentials to be transmitted from avian to pigs.

microbiology↗