Biology subjects

Tlais, H.

Publications and source records attributed to Tlais, H..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Dietary omega-6 arachidonic acid and omega-3 docosahexaenoic acid supplementation differentially impact skeletal muscle inflammaging in mice

Aging is associated with a gradual and progressive decline in skeletal muscle mass and strength known as sarcopenia, which has been attributed to chronic low-grade inflammation. Dietary long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LC-PUFAs), including omega-6 arachidonic acid (ARA) and omega-3 docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), are precursors to bioactive lipid mediators that regulate the initiation, propagation, and active resolution of inflammation. While traditionally considered a pro-inflammatory and catabolic factor, the ARA-derived eicosanoid prostaglandin E2 has recently emerged as a potential anti-sarcopenic molecule. DHA-derived specialized pro-resolving mediators may also act as immunomodulatory pro-regenerative molecules in muscle inflammaging. In the current study, we tested the effects of long-term dietary supplementation with either ARA or DHA on muscle health in aging mice. Twenty-two-month-old C57BL/6N mice were fed a control AIN-93M diet, or an AIN-93M diet supplemented with either ARA (0.48% w/w) or DHA (0.48% w/w) for 12 weeks. Both dietary interventions reduced total body weight, but only ARA reduced absolute fat mass and increased the percentage of lean mass. Despite these changes in body composition, ARA supplementation reduced absolute muscle strength and myofiber size. This functional decline was associated with increased neuromuscular junction fragmentation, elevated expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines/protein degradation markers, and suppressed ribosome biogenesis. In contrast, DHA uniquely reduced chronic inflammation of aged muscle and returned c-Myc expression to young levels but did not affect muscle mass or strength. These data demonstrate that long-term dietary intake of ARA and DHA have overall divergent effects on the structure and function of aging muscle.

physiology↗

bioRxiv2026

C26 and CT26 colorectal cancer models exhibit divergent cachexia phenotypes, intramuscular inflammation, and protein turnover signaling

Colorectal cancer (CRC) cachexia induces skeletal muscle dysfunction, impeding quality of life and worsening cancer prognosis. Multiple preclinical models, including the widely used mouse model of subcutaneous inoculation with the C26 colorectal carcinoma cell line, have been developed to study the biological mechanisms of CRC cachexia and elucidate potential new treatments. It has been proposed that a distinct cell line of the same origin, namely CT26, is relatively non-cachexic. However, studies evaluating the relative potential of C26 and CT26 cells to induce cancer cachexia in parallel have been limited. The differences in the biological mechanisms by which C26 and CT26 impact skeletal muscle mass and function have also not been fully elucidated. In the current study, we investigated the differential capacity of C26 and CT26 to induce cancer cachexia using both an in vitro cancer-muscle cell co-culture and an in vivo syngeneic mouse model. Our results show that both C26 and CT26 cells induced significant atrophy of murine C2C12 skeletal myotubes. In the mouse model, while C26 and CT26 both reduced skeletal muscle mass and fat mass, only C26 tumors led to loss of body weight and impaired skeletal muscle force output. We further show that C26 tumor-bearing mice exhibit greater muscle inflammation than CT26 tumor-bearing mice. In addition, mice bearing C26 and CT26 tumors showed differential regulation of the innate immune responses and muscle protein turnover. Overall, our data suggests that although both C26 and CT26 cells do exhibit cachexic effects, C26 cells induce greater loss in body weight, fat mass, skeletal muscle mass, and physical function via promoting chronic inflammation and deregulating protein balance of skeletal muscle.

physiology↗