bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Tjoelker, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Tjoelker, M..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Attributing the temperature response of tree seedling growth to underlying mechanisms

Studies of plant responses to temperature often focus on rates photosynthesis and respiration. However, within-plant utilisation and allocation of carbon are also strongly affected. It is unclear how much each of these processes contribute to determining the overall temperature response of growth. We applied a data assimilation framework to a glasshouse experiment with detailed physiological and growth measurements to investigate the relative contribution of different physiological processes to the overall temperature response of tree seedling growth. We found that both short-term effects of temperature and acclimatory responses of photosynthesis and respiration had a significant impact on the temperature response of growth. However, the effect of temperature on biomass allocation patterns to different tissues, non-structural carbohydrate utilisation and C losses to other unmeasured losses were also substantial in determining the temperature response of growth, particularly at sub-optimal temperatures. Our work demonstrates that the growth response to warming cannot be predicted using only the direct effect of temperature on photosynthesis and respiration and emphasizes the importance of temperature acclimation of photosynthesis, respiration and other C balance processes. Our results provide new guidance for process-based models to correctly describe the temperature effects on tree growth.

plant biology↗

Plant respiration: controlled by photosynthesis or biomass?

Two simplifying hypotheses have been proposed for whole-plant respiration. One links respiration to photosynthesis; the other to biomass. Using a first-principles carbon balance model with a prescribed live woody biomass turnover, applied at a forest research site where multidecadal measurements are available for comparison, we show that if turnover is fast the accumulation of respiring biomass is low and respiration depends primarily on photosynthesis; while if turnover is slow the accumulation of respiring biomass is high and respiration depends primarily on biomass. But the first scenario is inconsistent with evidence for substantial carryover of fixed carbon between years, while the second implies far too great an increase in respiration during stand development - leading to depleted carbohydrate reserves and an unrealistically high mortality risk. These two mutually incompatible hypotheses are thus both incorrect. Respiration is not linearly related either to photosynthesis or to biomass, but it is more strongly controlled by recent photosynthates (and reserve availability) than by total biomass.

ecology↗

Does circadian regulation lead to optimal gas exchange regulation?

Optimal stomatal theory is an evolutionary model proposing that leaves trade-off Carbon (C) for water to maximise C assimilation (A) and minimise transpiration (E), thereby generating a marginal water cost of carbon gain ({lambda}) that remains constant over short temporal scales. The circadian clock is a molecular timer of metabolism that controls A and stomatal conductance (gs), amongst other processes, in a broad array of plant species. Here, we test whether circadian regulation contributes towards achieving optimal stomatal behaviour. We subjected bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) canopies to fixed, continuous environmental conditions of photosynthetically active radiation, temperature and vapour pressure deficit over 48 hours. We observed a significant and self-sustained circadian oscillation in A and in stomatal conductance (gs) which also led to a circadian oscillation in{lambda} . The lack of constant marginal water cost indicates that circadian regulation does not directly lead to optimal stomatal behaviour. However, the temporal pattern in gas exchange, indicative of either maximizing A or of minimizing E, depending upon time of day, indicates that circadian regulation could contribute towards optimizing stomatal responses. More broadly, our results add to the emerging field of plant circadian ecology and show that molecular controls may partially explain leaf-level patterns observed in the field.

ecology↗