Biology subjects

Tietjen, G. T.

Publications and source records attributed to Tietjen, G. T..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2022

Comparative evaluation of glomerular morphometric techniques reveals differential technical artefacts between FSGS and normal glomeruli

Morphometric estimates of mean glomerular volume (MGV) have clinical implications, over and above histologic data. However, MGV estimation is time-consuming, could waste tissue sections and requires expertise limiting its utility in retrospective clinical studies. MethodsWe evaluated MGV using both plastic and paraffin-embedded tissue from control and FSGS mice (n=10 each) using the gold-standard Disector/Cavalieri technique (Vglom-Cav) and other reported techniques [2- or 3-profile technique, Weibel-Gomez method (W-G)]. Within Vglom-Cav we examined the precision of MGV estimation while using MGVs obtained from 5- or 10-individual glomeruli measurements vs the true mean (20 glomeruli). ResultsIn both FSGS and controls, we identified an acceptable precision of 10-glomerular sampling vs true MGV within Vglom-Cav technique [88 (79-94) % of MGV obtained were within 10% of the true MGV]. The 5-glomerular sampling was less precise [70 (56, 81) % of MGV obtained were within 10% of true MGV]. In plastic based techniques, 2- or 3-profile MGVs showed greater concordance with Vglom-Cav, than W-G MGV. The new 3-profile technique offered incremental benefit to the existing 2-profile method (improved Lins concordance in control and FSGS animals). We observed a consistent reduction of Vglom values within control animals (52+/-0.06%) in paraffin-embedded tissue (vs corresponding methods in plastic) demonstrating a clear shrinkage artefact due to tissue processing. FSGS glomeruli showed significantly less and more variable shrinkage artefact likely due to glomerular fibrosis. ConclusionWe report the precision of 5- or 10-glomerular sampling for MGV estimation using controls and FSGS animals. We demonstrate and quantify the shrinkage bias in MGV during tissue processing for paraffin-embedding that also differentiated control animals and FSGS. Our findings have implications for experimental studies using glomerular morphometry.

pathology↗

bioRxiv2019

Differential functional roles of fibroblasts and pericytes in the formation of tissue-engineered microvascular networks in vitro

AimsFormation of a perfusable microvascular network (VN) is critical for tissue engineering of solid organs. Stromal cells can support endothelial cell (EC) self-assembly into a VN, but distinct stromal cell populations may play different roles in this process. Here we investigated the effects that two widely used stromal cells populations, fibroblasts (FBs) and pericytes (PCs), have on VN formation. Methods and resultsWe examined the effects of adding defined stromal cell populations on the self-assembly of ECs derived from human endothelial colony forming cells (ECFCs) into perfusable VNs in fibrin gels cast within a microfluidics chamber. ECs alone fail to fully assemble a perfusable VN. Human lung FBs stimulate the formation of EC lined VNs within microfluidic devices. RNA-seq analysis suggested that FBs produce high levels of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), and addition of recombinant HGF improved VN formation within devices. Human placental PCs could not substitute for FBs, but in the presence of FBs, PCs closely associated with ECs, formed a common basement membrane, extended microfilaments intercellularly, and reduced microvessel diameters. ConclusionsDifferent stromal cell types provide different functions in microvessel assembly by ECs. FBs support VN formation by providing paracrine growth factors whereas PCs directly interact with ECs to modify microvascular morphology. Statement of ContributionNatalia Kosyakova, Derek Kao, William G. Chang were primarily responsible for the conception, design, interpretation of experiments, and drafting of the manuscript. Francesc Lopez-Giraldez carried out analysis of RNA-seq data. Susann Spindler and Gregory Tietjen assisted with microvessel analysis software. Morven Graham and Xinran Liu assisted with the electron microscopy. Kevin J. James and Jee Won Shin assisted with data collection. Jordan Pober assisted with a critical review of manuscript and experimental design.

cell biology↗