bioRxiv ScienceSearch

Biology subjects

Thompson, P. A.

Publications and source records attributed to Thompson, P. A..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Testing the unitary theory of language lateralisation using functional transcranial Doppler sonography study in adults

Cerebral lateralisation for language can vary from task to task, but it is unclear if this reflects error of measurement or independent lateralisation of different language systems. We used functional transcranial Doppler sonography to assess language lateralisation in 37 adults (7 left-handers) on six tasks, each given on two occasions. Tasks taxed different aspects of language function. A preregistered structural equation analysis was used to compare models of means and covariances. For most people, a single lateralised factor explained most of the covariance between tasks. A minority, however, showed dissociation of asymmetry, giving a second factor. This was mostly derived from a receptive task, which was highly reliable but not lateralised. The results suggest that variation in strength of language lateralisation reflects true individual differences and not just error of measurement. Inclusion of several tasks in a laterality battery makes it easier to detect cases of atypical asymmetry.

neuroscience

Lack of Evidence that Ursodeoxycholic Acid’s Effects on the Gut Microbiome Influence Colorectal Adenoma Risk

ObjectiveWe previously reported that Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), a therapeutic bile acid, reduces risk for advanced colorectal adenoma in men but not women. Interactions between the gut microbiome and fecal bile acid composition as a factor in colon cancer neoplasia have been postulated but evidence is limited to small cohorts and animal studies.\n\nDesignUsing banked stool samples collected as part of a phase III randomized clinical trial of UDCA for the prevention of colorectal neoplasia, we compared change in the microbiome composition after 3 years intervention in a subset of participants randomized to 8-10 mg/kg of body weight UDCA (n=198) to placebo (n=203). UDCA effects on the microbiome, sex and adenoma outcome were investigated.\n\nResultsStudy participants randomized to UDCA experienced compositional changes in their microbiome that were statistically more similar to other individuals in the UDCA arm than to those in the placebo arm. This change reflected an UDCA-associated shift in microbial community distance metrics (P <0.001), independent of sex, with no evidence of UDCA effect on microbial richness (P > 0.05). These UDCA-associated shifts in microbial community distance metrics from baseline to end-of-study were not associated with risk of any or advanced adenoma (all P> 0.05) in men or women.\n\nConclusionDespite a large sampling of randomized clinical trial participants, daily UDCA use only modestly influenced the relative abundance of microbial species in stool with no evidence for effects of UDCA on stool microbial community composition as a modifier of colorectal adenoma risk.\n\nSUMMARYO_ST_ABSWhat is already known about this subject?C_ST_ABSO_LIUrsodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is a therapeutic bile acid used in the treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) and investigated for anti-cancer activity in the colon\nC_LIO_LIIn humans, UDCA is produced in the colon from the conjugation of primary bile acids by intestinal bacteria\nC_LIO_LIIntestinal bacteria play a critical role in human intestinal health and disease including a hypothesized role in the development of colorectal cancer.\nC_LIO_LIUDCA was found to reduce the risk of more advanced colorectal adenoma with effects present in men but not women.\nC_LIO_LITherapeutic UDCA was recently shown to reduce the extent of bacterial dysbiosis in patients with PBC\nC_LI\n\nWhat are the new findings?O_LIAmong a population of patients with colorectal adenoma, low dose oral UDCA taken daily produced modest changes in fecal bacterial composition\nC_LIO_LIUDCA associated changes in the gut microbiome were similar in men and women.\nC_LIO_LIUDCA associated changes in the gut micobiome were not associated with risk of any or advanced colorectal adenoma in the patient population.\nC_LI\n\nHow might it impact on clinical practice in the foreseeable future?O_LIThese findings confirm effects of oral UDCA on the microbiome that may be beneficial for patients with PBC.\nC_LIO_LIThese findings suggest that the anti-cancer effects of UDCA for colorectal adenoma prevention are not due to major effects of UDCA on the gut microbiome.\nC_LI

cancer biology