bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Tessari, F.

Publications and source records attributed to Tessari, F..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

De Coordinatione Motus Humani: The Synergy Expansion Hypothesis

The search for an answer to Bernsteins degrees of freedom problem has propelled a large portion of research studies in human motor control over the past six decades. Different theories have been developed to explain how humans might use their incredibly complex neuro-musculo-skeletal system with astonishing ease. Among these theories, motor synergies appeared as one possible explanation. In this work, the authors investigate the nature and role of synergies and propose a new theoretical framework, namely the "expansion hypothesis", to answer Bernsteins problem. The expansion hypothesis is articulated in three propositions: mechanical, developmental, and behavioral. Each proposition addresses a different question on the nature of synergies: (i) How many synergies can humans have? (ii) How do we learn and develop synergies? (iii) How do we use synergies? An example numerical simulation is presented and analyzed to clarify the hypothesis propositions. The expansion hypothesis is contextualized with respect to the existing literature on motor synergies both in healthy and impaired individuals, as well as other prominent theories in human motor control and development. The expansion hypothesis provides a novel framework to better comprehend and explain the nature, use and evolution of human motor skills. Significance StatementUnderstanding how humans effortlessly control coordinated movements has been a long-standing challenge in neuroscience. This research introduces the "expansion hypothesis", a new framework to explain how we develop, learn, and use motor synergies - coordinated activities of multiple features such as joints and muscles - that simplify movement control. By breaking down the nature of these synergies into mechanical, developmental, and behavioral aspects, this study offers novel insights into how our brains and bodies work together to achieve fluid motion. This work not only advances the scientific understanding of human motor control but also has potential implications for improving rehabilitation strategies for individuals with movement impairments and for developing more dexterous human-inspired robotic control techniques.

neuroscience↗

The impact of gravity on functional movements: kinematic insights and features selection

Exploring the impact of gravity on daily upper-limb movements is crucial for comprehending the complexities of upper-limb impairments. The present study delves into the relationship between the gravitational force and the functional aspects of upper-limb mobility. Starting from 9 pick-and-place tasks, hand trajectories of 24 healthy subjects were acquired using a motion capture system. Five in-use and two novel kinematic metrics were calculated by such trends and tested across conditions. Results suggest movements performed against and propelled by gravity lead to statistically significant changes in motor behaviour in terms of planning, smoothness, efficiency, and accuracy of the movement, underlining the need of differentiating the study of such movements in impaired subjects.

neuroscience↗

Brownian Processes in Human Motor Tasks: Behavioral Evidence of Velocity-level Planning

The motor neuroscience literature suggests that the central nervous system may encode some motor commands in terms of velocity. In this work, we tackle the question: what consequences would velocity commands produce at the behavioral level? Considering the ubiquitous presence of noise in the neuromusculoskeletal system, we predict that velocity commands affected by stationary noise would produce "random walks", also known as Brownian processes, in position. Brownian motions are distinctively characterized by a linearly growing variance and a power spectral density that declines in inverse proportion to frequency. This work first shows that these Brownian processes are indeed observed in unbounded motion tasks e.g., rotating a crank. We further predict that such growing variance would still be present, but bounded, in tasks requiring a constant posture e.g., maintaining a static hand position or quietly standing. This hypothesis was also confirmed by experimental observations. A series of descriptive models are investigated to justify the observed behavior. Interestingly, one of the models capable of accounting for all the experimental results must feature forward-path velocity commands corrupted by stationary noise. The results of this work provide behavioral support for the hypothesis that humans plan the motion components of their actions in terms of velocity.

neuroscience↗