bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Terry, J. C.

Publications and source records attributed to Terry, J. C..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Thinking like a naturalist: enhancing computer vision of citizen science images by harnessing contextual data

O_LIThe accurate identification of species in images submitted by citizen scientists is currently a bottleneck for many data uses. Machine learning tools offer the potential to provide rapid, objective and scalable species identification for the benefit of many aspects of ecological science. Currently, most approaches only make use of image pixel data for classification. However, an experienced naturalist would also use a wide variety of contextual information such as the location and date of recording.\nC_LIO_LIHere, we examine the automated identification of ladybird (Coccinellidae) records from the British Isles submitted to the UK Ladybird Survey, a volunteer-led mass participation recording scheme. Each image is associated with metadata; a date, location and recorder ID, which can be cross-referenced with other data sources to determine local weather at the time of recording, habitat types and the experience of the observer. We built multi-input neural network models that synthesise metadata and images to identify records to species level.\nC_LIO_LIWe show that machine learning models can effectively harness contextual information to improve the interpretation of images. Against an image-only baseline of 48.2%, we observe a 9.1 percentage-point improvement in top-1 accuracy with a multi-input model compared to only a 3.6% increase when using an ensemble of image and metadata models. This suggests that contextual data is being used to interpret an image, beyond just providing a prior expectation. We show that our neural network models appear to be utilising similar pieces of evidence as human naturalists to make identifications.\nC_LIO_LIMetadata is a key tool for human naturalists. We show it can also be harnessed by computer vision systems. Contextualisation offers considerable extra information, particularly for challenging species, even within small and relatively homogeneous areas such as the British Isles. Although complex relationships between disparate sources of information can be profitably interpreted by simple neural network architectures, there is likely considerable room for further progress. Contextualising images has the potential to lead to a step change in the accuracy of automated identification tools, with considerable benefits for large scale verification of submitted records.\nC_LI

ecology↗

Finding missing links in interaction networks

Documenting which species interact within ecological communities is challenging and labour-intensive. As a result, many interactions remain unrecorded, potentially distorting our understanding of network structure and dynamics. We test the utility of four structural models and a new coverage-deficit model for predicting missing links in both simulated and empirical bipartite networks. We find they can perform well, but that the predictive power of structural models varies with the underlying network structure. Predictions can be improved by ensembling multiple models. Sample-coverage estimators of the number of missed interactions are highly correlated with the number of missed interactions, but strongly biased towards underestimating the true number of missing links. Augmenting observed networks with most-likely missing links improves estimates of qualitative network metrics. Tools to identify likely missing links can be simple to implement, allowing the prioritisation of research effort and more robust assessment of network properties.

ecology↗

Interaction modifications lead to greater robustness than pairwise non-trophic effects in ecological networks

O_LIConsiderable emphasis has been placed recently on the importance of incorporating non-trophic effects in to our understanding of ecological networks. Interaction modifications are well established as generating strong non-trophic impacts by modulating the strength of inter-specific interactions.\nC_LIO_LIFor simplicity and comparison with direct interactions within a network context, the consequences of interaction modifications have often been described as direct pairwise interactions. The consequences of this assumption have not been examined in non-equilibrium settings where unexpected consequences of interaction modifications are most likely.\nC_LIO_LITo test the distinct dynamic nature of these higher-order effects we directly compare, using dynamic simulations, the robustness to extinctions under perturbation of systems where interaction modifications are either explicitly modelled or represented by corresponding equivalent pairwise non-trophic interactions.\nC_LIO_LIFull, multi-species representations of interaction modifications resulted in a greater robustness to extinctions compared to equivalent pairwise effects. Explanations for this increased stability despite apparent greater dynamic complexity can be found in additional routes for dynamic feedbacks. Furthermore, interaction modifications changed the relative vulnerability of species to extinction from those trophically connected close to the perturbed species towards those receiving a large number of modifications.\nC_LIO_LIFuture empirical and theoretical research into non-trophic effects should distinguish interaction modifications from direct pairwise effects in order to maximise information about the system dynamics. Interaction modifications have the potential to shift expectations of species vulnerability based exclusively on trophic networks.\nC_LI

ecology↗

Interaction Modifications Disrupt The Structure And Stability Of Ecological Communities

Trophic interaction modifications, where a consumer-resource interaction is influenced by an additional species, are established as being prevalent throughout ecological networks. Despite this, their influence on the structure of interaction distributions within communities has not yet been examined. Although empirical information about the distribution of interaction modifications is currently sparse, the non-trophic effects they induce will be structured by the underlying network of trophic interactions. Here we test the impact of interaction modifications, introduced under a range of distributional assumptions to artificial and empirical trophic networks, on the overall structure of interactions within communities. We show that local stability and reactivity is critically dependent on the inter-relationship between the trophic and non-trophic effects. Depending on their distribution, interaction modifications can generate significant additional structure to community interactions making analyses of the stability of ecological systems based solely on trophic networks unreliable. Empirical information on the topological and strength distributions of interaction modifications will be a key part of understanding the dynamics of communities.

ecology↗