bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Tennessen, J. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Tennessen, J. M..

22 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

A genetic screen using the Drosophila melanogaster TRiP RNAi collection to identify metabolic enzymes required for eye development

The metabolic enzymes that compose glycolysis, the citric acid cycle, and other pathways within central carbon metabolism have emerged as key regulators of animal development. These enzymes not only generate the energy and biosynthetic precursors required to support cell proliferation and differentiation, but also moonlight as regulators of transcription, translation, and signal transduction. Many of the genes associated with animal metabolism, however, have never been analyzed in a developmental context, thus highlighting how little is known about the intersection of metabolism and development. Here we address this deficiency by using the Drosophila TRiP RNAi collection to disrupt the expression of over 1,100 metabolism-associated genes within cells of the eye imaginal disc. Our screen not only confirmed previous observations that oxidative phosphorylation serves a critical role in the developing eye, but also implicated a host of other metabolic enzymes in the growth and differentiation of this organ. Notably, our analysis revealed a requirement for glutamine and glutamate metabolic processes in eye development, thereby revealing a role of these amino acids in promoting Drosophila tissue growth. Overall, our analysis highlights how the Drosophila eye can serve as a powerful tool for dissecting the relationship between development and metabolism.

genetics↗

Lactate and glycerol-3-phosphate metabolism cooperatively regulate growth and redox balance during Drosophila melanogaster larval development

The dramatic growth that occurs during Drosophila larval development requires rapid conversion of nutrients into biomass. Many larval tissues respond to these biosynthetic demands by increasing carbohydrate metabolism and lactate dehydrogenase (dLDH) activity. The resulting metabolic program is ideally suited to synthesize macromolecules and mimics the manner by which cancer cells rely on aerobic glycolysis. To explore the potential role of Drosophila dLDH in promoting biosynthesis, we examined how dLdh mutations influence larval development. Our studies unexpectantly found that dLdh mutants grow at a normal rate, indicating that dLDH is dispensable for larval biomass production. However, subsequent metabolomic analyses suggested that dLdh mutants compensate for the inability to produce lactate by generating excess glycerol-3-phosphate (G3P), the production of which also influences larval redox balance. Consistent with this possibility, larvae lacking both dLDH and G3P dehydrogenase (GPDH1) exhibit developmental delays, synthetic lethality, and aberrant carbohydrate metabolism. Considering that human cells also generate G3P upon Lactate Dehydrogenase A (LDHA) inhibition, our findings hint at a conserved mechanism in which the coordinate regulation of lactate and G3P synthesis imparts metabolic robustness upon growing animal tissues.

developmental biology↗

The Drosophila mitochondrial citrate carrier regulates L-2-hydroxyglutarate accumulation by coupling the tricarboxylic acid cycle with glycolysis

The oncometabolites D- and L-2-hydroxyglutarate (2HG) broadly interfere with cellular metabolism, physiology, and gene expression. A key regulator of 2HG metabolism is the mitochondrial citrate carrier (CIC), which, when mutated, promotes excess D-/L-2HG accumulation. The mechanism by which CIC influences 2HG levels, however, remains unknown. Here we studied the Drosophila gene scheggia (sea), which encodes the fly CIC homolog, to explore the mechanisms linking mitochondrial citrate efflux to L-2HG metabolism. Our findings demonstrate that decreased Drosophila CIC activity results in elevated glucose catabolism and increased lactate production, thereby creating a metabolic environment that inhibits L-2HG degradation.

genetics↗

Primary souring: a novel bacteria-free method for sour beer production

In the beverage fermentation industry, especially at the craft or micro level, there is a movement to incorporate as many local ingredients as possible to both capture terroir and stimulate local economies. In the case of craft beer, this has traditionally only encompassed locally sourced barley, hops, and other agricultural adjuncts. The identification and use of novel yeasts in brewing lags behind. We sought to bridge this gap by bio-prospecting for wild yeasts, with a focus on the American Midwest. We isolated 284 different strains from 54 species of yeast and have begun to determine their fermentation characteristics. During this work, we found several isolates of five species that produce lactic acid and ethanol during wort fermentation: Hanseniaspora vineae, Lachancea fermentati, Lachancea thermotolerans, Schizosaccharomyces japonicus, and Wickerhamomyces anomalus. Tested representatives of these species yielded excellent attenuation, lactic acid production, and sensory characteristics, positioning them as viable alternatives to lactic acid bacteria (LAB) for the production of sour beers. Indeed, we suggest a new LAB-free paradigm for sour beer production that we term \"primary souring\" because the lactic acid production and resultant pH decrease occurs during primary fermentation, as opposed to kettle souring or souring via mixed culture fermentation.\n\nChemical compounds studied in this article: Lactic acid (PubChem CID: 612); Ethanol (PubChem CID: 702)\n\nAbbreviations: ABV, alcohol by volume; DIC, differential interference contrast; EtOH, ethanol; FG, final gravity; gDNA, genomic DNA; IBU, international bittering unit; LAB, lactic acid bacteria; LASSO, lactic acid specific soft-agar overlay; N-J, neighbor-joining; OG, original gravity; WLN, Wallerstein Laboratories nutrient; YPD, yeast extract, peptone, and dextrose

microbiology↗