bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Tcheremenskaia, O.

Publications and source records attributed to Tcheremenskaia, O..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

On-site microbial community analysis in rivers: integrating autonomous sampling with a portable sequencing workflow

Studies focused on bacterial diversity in rivers often face significant limitations. Traditional sampling approaches frequently overlook spatial and temporal variability at the reach scale. Molecular techniques, such as metabarcoding and metagenomics, can partially address this issue by providing deeper insights. However, this approach usually involves highly specialized laboratories and high costs, making large-scale and long-term monitoring of river networks unfeasible in most cases. Thus, we developed a methodology based on remote-controlled boats, allowing the collection of integrated samples in freshwater ecosystems. Combined with a portable laboratory, this approach enabled the development of new surface water monitoring strategies. Here, we describe the operational application of this system for in situ monitoring of bacterioplankton communities across 8 sections of the Ter River (Catalonia, Spain). [To explore its potential, we applied both 16S rRNA gene sequencing using Nanopore technology (MinION) in the field, and shotgun metagenomics using Illumina technology in the laboratory, acknowledging the intrinsic differences between sequencing targets, platforms, and analysis pipelinesMinIONMinION sequencing enabled microbiome characterization and identification of the main bacterial taxa just 72 h after sampling, offering significantly lower costs and reduced manpower requirements. Furthermore, amplification facilitated the full characterization of bacterioplankton diversity along the river, preventing the exclusion of uncommon taxa. While shotgun metagenomics is still necessary for understanding the functional activity of these organisms, our approach provides a cost-effective framework for developing efficient follow-up sampling methodologies.

microbiology↗

Variability and uncertainty of data from genotoxicity Test Guidelines: What we know and why it matters.

This review comprehensively examines the variability and uncertainty associated with test guideline (TG)-conform genotoxicity data and explores the respective implications for the integration of non-animal-methods (NAMs) into regulatory frameworks. Historical amendments to OECD TGs are mapped to reveal the methods evolution that improves the scientific quality of the data but also explains data heterogeneity within available databases. An analysis of the major genotoxicity databases ECVAM, ISSMIC, and OASIS demonstrates substantial variability in genotoxicity calls. Using the EFSA genotoxicity database, which currently harbours the best-curated (meta-) data, we estimate that 22-77% of compounds exhibit similarity of replicate results below 85%, depending on the assay. The potentially most important variables statistically explaining variability and sensitivity were analysed. The practical limitations to identify them with high reliability and to define their optimum needs to be accepted as a qualitative baseline uncertainty. These findings underscore the necessity of contextualizing NAM performance evaluations within the intrinsic variability and uncertainty of animal and in vitro reference data. We propose that this variability is explicitly considered in the development and validation of NAM-based Integrated Approaches for Testing and Assessment (IATAs). This review provides a critical foundation for regulators and scientists aiming to enhance the acceptance and utility of NAMs in genotoxicity assessment.

pharmacology and toxicology↗