Biology subjects

Tatayah, V.

Publications and source records attributed to Tatayah, V..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2022

The role of wingbeat frequency and amplitude in flight power

Body-mounted accelerometers provide a new prospect for estimating power use in flying birds, as the signal varies with the two major kinematic determinants of aerodynamic power: wingbeat frequency and amplitude. Yet wingbeat frequency is sometimes used as a proxy for power output in isolation. There is therefore a need to understand which kinematic parameter birds vary and whether this is predicted by flight mode (e.g., accelerating, ascending/descending flight), speed or morphology. We investigate this using high-frequency acceleration data from (i) 14 species flying in the wild, (ii) two species flying in controlled conditions in a wind tunnel and (iii) a review of experimental and field studies. While wingbeat frequency and amplitude were positively correlated, R2 values were generally low, supporting the idea that parameters can vary independently. Indeed, birds were more likely to modulate wingbeat amplitude for more energy-demanding flight modes, including climbing and take-off. Nonetheless, the striking variability even within species and flight types, highlights the complexity of describing the kinematic relationships, which appear sensitive to both the biological and physical context. Notwithstanding this acceleration metrics that incorporate both kinematic parameters should be more robust proxies for power than wingbeat frequency alone.

biophysics↗

bioRxiv2022

Extreme tolerable winds for seabirds are determined by morphology

Storms can cause widespread seabird strandings and wrecking1,2,3,4,5, yet little is known about the maximum wind speeds that birds are able to tolerate or the conditions they avoid. We analyzed > 300,000 hours of tracking data from 18 seabird species, including flapping and soaring fliers, to assess how flight morphology affects wind selectivity, both at fine scales (hourly movement steps) and across the breeding season. We found no general preference or avoidance of particular wind speeds within foraging tracks. This suggests seabird flight morphology is adapted to a "wind niche", with higher wing loading being selected for in windier environments. In support of this, wing loading was positively related to the median wind speeds on the breeding grounds, as well as the maximum wind speeds in which birds flew. Yet globally, the highest wind speeds occur in the tropics (in association with tropical cyclones) where birds are morphologically adapted to low median wind speeds. Tropical species must therefore show behavioral responses to extreme winds, including long-range avoidance of wind speeds that can be twice their operable maxima. In contrast, procellariiformes flew in almost all wind speeds they encountered at a seasonal scale. Despite this, we describe a small number of cases where albatrosses avoided strong winds at close-range, including by flying into the eye of the storm. Extreme winds appear to pose context- dependent risks to seabirds, and more information is needed on the factors that determine the hierarchy of risk, given the impact of global change on storm intensity 6,7.

animal behavior and cognition↗

bioRxiv2021

Ecological inference using data from accelerometers needs careful protocols

O_LIAccelerometers in animal-attached tags have proven to be powerful tools in behavioural ecology, being used to determine behaviour and provide proxies for movement-based energy expenditure. Researchers are collecting and archiving data across systems, seasons and device types. However, in order to use data repositories to draw ecological inference, we need to establish the error introduced according to sensor type and position on the study animal and establish protocols for error assessment and minimization. C_LIO_LIUsing laboratory trials, we examine the absolute accuracy of tri-axial accelerometers and determine how inaccuracies impact measurements of dynamic body acceleration (DBA), as the main acceleration-based proxy for energy expenditure. We then examine how tag type and placement affect the acceleration signal in birds using (i) pigeons Columba livia flying in a wind tunnel, with tags mounted simultaneously in two positions, (ii) back- and tail-mounted tags deployed on wild kittiwakes Rissa tridactyla. Finally, we (iii) present a case study where two generations of tag were deployed using different attachment procedures on red-tailed tropicbirds Phaethon rubricauda foraging in different seasons. C_LIO_LIBench tests showed that individual acceleration axes required a two-level correction (representing up to 4.3% of the total value) to eliminate measurement error. This resulted in DBA differences of up to 5% between calibrated and uncalibrated tags for humans walking at different speeds. Device position was associated with greater variation in DBA, with upper- and lower back-mounted tags in pigeons varying by 9%, and tail- and back-mounted tags varying by 13% in kittiwakes. Finally, DBA varied by 25% in tropicbirds between seasons, which may be attributable to tag attachment procedures. C_LIO_LIAccelerometer accuracy, tag placement, and attachment details critically affect the signal amplitude and thereby the ability of the system to detect biologically meaningful phenomena. We propose a simple method to calibrate accelerometers that should be used prior to deployments and archived with resulting data, suggest a way that researchers can assess accuracy in previously collected data, and caution that variable tag placement and attachment can increase sensor noise and even generate trends that have no biological meaning. C_LI

animal behavior and cognition↗