Biology subjects

Tanca, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Tanca, A..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

A configuration-resolved benchmark of differential abundance analysis methods for human gut 16S rRNA microbiome data

Tools for differential abundance testing of 16S rRNA data are conventionally treated as discrete methods, and benchmarks have accordingly sought to determine which tool performs best. However, each tool offers an array of configurations based on different normalisation, transformation, reference choice, and sensitivity filtering methods, and the specific impact of these configurations on performance has rarely been systematically investigated. We benchmarked five widely used tools (MaAsLin 2, MaAsLin 3, edgeR, ALDEx2, and ANCOM-BC2) across 18 configurations, using simulated communities and human gut profiles with implanted signals, at two taxonomic resolutions and across several design factors. Configuration accounted for as much performance variation as the choice of tool itself, with the ranking of two tools depending on which of their settings are compared. Individual parameters behaved as switches between opposite error regimes rather than as graded adjustments, and the settings carrying this weight are identifiable in advance. These behaviours were reproducible across data sources and resolutions. Our results define a configuration-aware framework for matching a tool and its settings to the cohort, study design, and feature resolution, establishing that a differential abundance result is interpretable only if the configuration used for the analysis is reported.

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2025

Critical Assessment of MetaProteome Investigation 2 (CAMPI-2): Multi-laboratory assessment of sample processing methods to stabilize fecal microbiome for functional analysis

BackgroundFecal samples are widely used as a proxy for studying gut microbiome composition in both human and animal research. Fecal metaproteomics provides valuable insights by tracking changes in the relative abundance of microbial taxa and their protein functions. To ensure reliable results, it is crucial to minimize alterations in the metaproteome occurring from sample collection to protein extraction. Therefore, employing effective stabilization methods is essential to preserve the integrity of the fecal metaproteome from sample collection to laboratory analysis, particularly over long distances or when rapid freezing options are not readily available. In line with these needs, the second edition of the Critical Assessment of MetaProteome Investigation (CAMPI-2) was specifically focused on testing sample stabilization protocols to be applied before metaproteomic analysis. ResultsThis collaborative multicenter study assessed the ability of five different stabilization methods, based on two commercial devices and three specific reagents (acetone, lithium dodecyl sulfate, and an RNAlater-like buffer), respectively, to stabilize the fecal metaproteome during room-temperature storage (14 days) and shipment to mass spectrometry facilities. The five methods were tested simultaneously by eight different laboratories across Europe, using aliquots from the same fecal sample. After protein extraction and digestion, duplicate aliquots of the resulting peptides were analyzed independently by two mass spectrometry facilities at distinct international locations. Analysis of the mass spectrometric data using two different search engines revealed that the fecal metaproteome profile differed considerably depending on the stabilization method used in terms of richness, alpha and beta diversity, reproducibility, and quantitative distribution of main taxa and functions. Although each method showed unique strengths and weaknesses, a commercial swab-based device stood out for its remarkable reproducibility and ranked highest for most of the metrics measured. ConclusionsCAMPI-2 allowed a robust evaluation of five different methods for preserving fecal metaproteome samples. The present investigation provides useful data for the design of metaproteomics and multi-omics studies where fecal sampling cannot be immediately followed by long-term storage at -80{degrees}C. Further optimization of the tested protocols is necessary to improve stabilization efficiency and control bias in the taxonomic and functional profile of the gut microbiome.

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2023

Unipept Desktop 2.0: construction of targeted reference protein databases for proteogenomics analyses

Unipept Desktop 2.0 is the most recent iteration of the Unipept Desktop tool that adds support for the analysis of proteogenomics datasets. Unipept Desktop now supports the automatic construction of targeted protein reference databases that only contain proteins associated with a predetermined list of taxa. This improves both the taxonomic and functional resolution of a metaproteomic analysis and yields several technical advantages. By limiting the proteins present in a reference database, it is now also possible to perform (meta)proteogenomics analyses. Since the protein reference database now lives on the users local machine, they have complete control over the database used during an analysis. Data does no longer need to be transmitted over the internet, decreasing the time required for an analysis and better safeguarding privacy sensitive data. As a proof of concept, we present a case study in which a human gut metaproteome dataset is analyzed with Unipept Desktop 2.0 using different targeted databases based on matched 16S rRNA gene sequencing data.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2021

Critical Assessment of Metaproteome Investigation (CAMPI): a Multi-Lab Comparison of Established Workflows

Metaproteomics has matured into a powerful tool to assess functional interactions in microbial communities. While many metaproteomic workflows are available, the impact of method choice on results remains unclear. Here, we carried out the first community-driven, multi-laboratory comparison in metaproteomics: the critical assessment of metaproteome investigation study (CAMPI). Based on well-established workflows, we evaluated the effect of sample preparation, mass spectrometry, and bioinformatic analysis using two samples: a simplified, laboratory-assembled human intestinal model and a human fecal sample. We observed that variability at the peptide level was predominantly due to sample processing workflows, with a smaller contribution of bioinformatic pipelines. These peptide-level differences largely disappeared at the protein group level. While differences were observed for predicted community composition, similar functional profiles were obtained across workflows. CAMPI demonstrates the robustness of present-day metaproteomics research, serves as a template for multi-laboratory studies in metaproteomics, and provides publicly available data sets for benchmarking future developments.

microbiology↗