bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Talon, I.

Publications and source records attributed to Talon, I..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PU.1 drives specification of pluripotent stem cell-derived endothelial cells to LSEC-like cells

To date there is no representative in vitro model for liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs), as primary LSECs dedifferentiate very fast in culture and no combination of cytokines or growth factors can induce an LSEC fate in (pluripotent stem cell-derived) endothelial cells (ECs). Furthermore, the transcriptional programs driving an LSEC fate have not yet been described. Here, we first present a computational workflow (CenTFinder) that can identify transcription factors (TFs) that are crucial for modulating pathways involved in cell lineage specification. Using CenTFinder, we identified several novel LSEC-specific protein markers such as FCN2 and FCN3, which were validated by analysis of previously published single-cell RNAseq data. We also identified PU.1 (encoded by the SPI1 gene) as a major regulator of LSEC-specific immune functions. We show that SPI1 overexpression (combined with the general EC transcription factor ETV2) in human pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) induces ECs with an LSEC-like phenotype. The ETV2-SPI1-ECs display increased expression of LSEC markers such as CD32B and MRC1 as well as several of the proposed novel markers. More importantly, ETV2-SPI1-ECs acquire LSEC functions, including uptake of FSA-FITC as well as labelled IgG. In conclusion, we present the CenTFinder computational tool to identify key regulatory TFs within specific pathways, in this work pathways of lineage specification, and we demonstrate its use by the identification and validation of PU.1 as a master regulator for LSEC fating.

developmental biology↗

Defining totipotency using criteria of increasing stringency

Totipotency is the ability of a single cell to give rise to all the differentiated cells that build the conceptus, yet how to capture this property in vitro remains incompletely understood. Defining totipotency relies upon a variety of assays of variable stringency. Here we describe criteria to define totipotency. We illustrate how distinct criteria of increasing stringency can be used to judge totipotency by evaluating candidate totipotent cell types in the mouse, including early blastomeres and expanded or extended pluripotent stem cells. Our data challenge the notion that expanded or extended pluripotent states harbor increased totipotent potential relative to conventional embryonic stem cells under in vivo conditions.

cell biology↗

Dynamic Erasure of Random X-Chromosome Inactivation during iPSC Reprogramming

BackgroundInduction and reversal of chromatin silencing is critical for successful development, tissue homeostasis and the derivation of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) and reactivation (XCR) in female cells represent chromosome-wide transitions between active and inactive chromatin states. While XCI has long been studied and provided important insights into gene regulation, the dynamics and mechanisms underlying the reversal of stable chromatin silencing of X-linked genes are much less understood. Here, we use allele-specific transcriptomic approaches to study XCR during mouse iPSC reprogramming in order to elucidate the timing and mechanisms of chromosome-wide reversal of gene silencing. ResultsWe show that XCR is hierarchical, with subsets of genes reactivating early, late and very late. Early genes are activated before the onset of late pluripotency genes activation and the complete silencing of the long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) Xist. These genes are located genomically closer to genes that escape XCI, unlike those reactivating late. Interestingly, early genes also show increased pluripotency transcription factor (TF) binding. We also reveal that histone deacetylases (HDACs) restrict XCR in reprogramming intermediates and that the severe hypoacetylation state of the Xi persists until late reprogramming stages. ConclusionsAltogether, these results reveal the timing of transcriptional activation of mono-allelically repressed genes during iPSC reprogramming, and suggest that allelic activation involves the combined action of chromatin topology, pluripotency transcription factors and chromatin regulators. These findings are important for our understanding of gene silencing, maintenance of cell identity, reprogramming and disease.

developmental biology↗

Two Active X-chromosomes Modulate the Growth, Pluripotency Exit and DNA Methylation Landscape of Mouse Naive Pluripotent Stem Cells through Different Pathways

During early mammalian development, the two X-chromosomes in female cells are active. Dosage compensation between XX female and XY male cells is then achieved by X-chromosome inactivation in female cells. Reprogramming female mouse somatic cells into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) leads to X-chromosome reactivation. The extent to which increased X-chromosome dosage (X-dosage) in female iPSCs leads to differences in the molecular and cellular properties of XX and XY iPSCs is still unclear. We show that chromatin accessibility in mouse iPSCs is modulated by X-dosage. Specific sets of transcriptional regulator motifs are enriched in chromatin with increased accessibility in XX or XY iPSCs. We show that the transcriptome, growth and pluripotency exit are also modulated by X-dosage in iPSCs. To understand the mechanisms by which increased X-dosage modulates the molecular and cellular properties of mouse pluripotent stem cells, we used heterozygous deletions of the X-linked gene Dusp9 in XX embryonic stem cells. We show that X-dosage regulates the transcriptome, open chromatin landscape, growth and pluripotency exit largely independently of global DNA methylation. Our results uncover new insights into X-dosage in pluripotent stem cells, providing principles of how gene dosage modulates the epigenetic and genetic mechanisms regulating cell identity.

developmental biology↗