bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Talavera, E.

Publications and source records attributed to Talavera, E..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

On the utility of Deep Learning for model classification and parameter estimation on complex diversification scenarios.

Birth-Death models applied to dated phylogenies are a useful tool to study past diversification dynamics. Parameters in these stochastic models are typically inferred using likelihood-based methods such as Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) or Bayesian Inference. However, these approaches exhibit computational tractability issues in the case of models of moderate to high complexity. One approach to increase model complexity while remaining computationally tractable in the context of birth-death modelling is machine learning. So far, these techniques have been explored in the context of serially-sampled phylogenies (phylodynamics) and trait-dependent birth-death models. Here, we explored the power of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), a type of Deep Learning (DL) method, to solve classification and regression (parameter estimation) tasks under constant-rate and time-homogeneous, rate-variable birth-death models. In particular, we compared six diversification scenarios: Constant Birth-Death, High-Extinction, Mass-Extinction, Diversity-Dependent, Stasis-and-Radiate, and Waxing-and-Waning. We simulated 10, 000 phylogenetic trees under each diversification scenario, which were encoded using a vectorization procedure that captures the topology and branch length information. The encoded trees were used to train or test a set of CNNs models that were designed to tailor three empirical case studies differing in the number of tips. We compared CNNs performance with MLE inference. Our results show that CNNs exhibited classification accuracy levels of 93-78%, whereas maximum likelihood estimation achieved levels of 74-70%. The most difficult scenarios to predict for the CNNs were the high-extinction and mass-extinction scenarios, which were often misidentified as one another. For the regression tasks, mean average errors were comparable between CNNs models and MLE inference, and they also coincided in their difficulty estimating ratio parameters such as mass extinction survival and turnover. Finally, we applied our CNNs to three empirical studies (eucalypts, conifers and cetaceans) and discussed potential shortcomings and future avenues for improvement in the application of deep-learning birth-death modelling approaches.

evolutionary biology↗

Physiological predictors of competitive performance in CrossFit(R) athletes

The aim of this study was to determine which physiological variables could predict performance during a CrossFit competition. Fifteen male CrossFit athletes (35 {+/-} 9 years) participated and performed a series of tests (incremental load test for full squat and bench press, jump tests, incremental running test, and Wingate test) that were used as potential predictors of CrossFit performance. Thereafter, they performed the five Workouts of the Day (WODs) corresponding to the CrossFit Games Open 2019, and the relationship between each variable and CrossFit performance was analyzed. Overall Crossfit performance (i.e., final ranking considering all WODs) was significantly related to jump ability, mean and peak power output during the Wingate test, relative maximum strength for the full squat and the bench press, and maximum oxygen uptake and maximum speed during an incremental running test (all p<0.05, r=0.58-0.75), although the relationship of most markers varied depending on the analyzed WOD. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the combination of maximum oxygen uptake, squat jump ability, and reactive strength index accounted for 81% of the variance in overall CrossFit performance (p=0.0003). CrossFit performance seems dependent on a variety of power-, strength-, and aerobic-related markers, which reflects the complexity of this sport. Improvements in aerobic capacity may help people and athletes in CrossFit performance and well-being. Also, focus on lower body power could be the key to obtain better performance markers.

physiology↗