bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Taha, K.

Publications and source records attributed to Taha, K..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Accessing Enzyme Kinetic Data and Prediction Methods at Scale

Enzyme kinetic parameters inform metabolic models, yet experimental measurements are sparse. A growing body of work predicts them from protein and substrate features, but software fragmentation hinders adoption, so downstream tools lock into the most accessible method. We present OpenKinetics Predictor (at predictor.openkinetics.org), an open-source platform integrating thirteen methods in isolated environments behind one interface. The platform optionally reports similarity between query proteins and each method's training data to contextualise reliability. A common featurisation-prediction abstraction keeps it extensible, and independent parties, including original authors, contributed many methods. We pair it with a data portal (at data.openkinetics.org) that exposes CatLog, a curated kinetic dataset, with precomputed embeddings, predicted binding sites, and standardised splits. Both offer a web interface and an API, and the GECKO modelling toolbox already calls the predictor API. As a case study, we predict across an E. coli model and find inter-predictor agreement varies with metabolic context and data availability.

systems biology↗

Employing Machine Learning Techniques to Detect Protein-Protein Interaction: A Survey, Experimental, and Comparative Evaluations

This survey paper provides an in-depth analysis of various machine learning techniques and algorithms that are utilized in the detection of PPI (Protein-Protein Interactions). For every technique examined, the paper evaluates its efficiency, shortcomings, possibilities for enhancement, and outlook for the future. A major challenge in current survey papers focusing on machine learning algorithms for PPI identification is the successful categorization of these algorithms. To overcome this challenge, the paper introduces a novel hierarchical taxonomy that organizes algorithms into more intricate categories and distinct techniques. The proposed taxonomy is constructed on a four-tier structure, beginning with the broad methodology category, and ending with specific sub-techniques. This structure facilitates a more systematic and exhaustive categorization of algorithms, aiding researchers in grasping the connections between different algorithms and techniques. Included in the paper are both empirical and experimental assessments to classify the various techniques. The empirical assessment judges the techniques according to four standards. The experimental evaluations carry out the following rankings: (1) the algorithms that employ the same specific sub-technique, (2) the different sub-techniques that employ the same technique, (3) the different techniques that employ the same methodology sub-category, and (4) the different methodology sub-categories within the same methodology category. By merging the new methodological taxonomy, empirical analyses, and experimental evaluations, the paper provides a multifaceted and thorough comprehension of the machine learning methods and algorithms for PPI detection. This synthesis helps researchers make well-informed decisions. In its conclusion, the paper furnishes crucial insights into the future possibilities of machine learning techniques for PPI identification, underscoring potential advancements and areas ripe for continued exploration and development.

bioinformatics↗