bioRxiv ScienceSearch

Biology subjects

Szekely, T.

Publications and source records attributed to Szekely, T..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Divergence in the face of gene flow in two Charadrius plovers along the Chinese coast

Speciation with gene flow is an alternative to the nascence of new taxa in strict allopatric separation. Indeed, many taxa have parapatric distributions at present. It is often unclear if these are secondary contacts, e.g. caused by past glaciation cycles or the manifestation of speciation with gene flow, which hampers our understanding of how different forces drive diversification. Here we studied genetic, phenotypic and ecological aspects of divergence in a pair of incipient species, the Kentish (Charadrius alexandrinus) and the white-faced Plovers (C. dealbatus), shorebirds with parapatric breeding ranges along the Chinese coast. We assessed divergence based on molecular markers with different modes of inheritance and quantified phenotypic and ecological divergence in aspects of morphometric, dietary and climatic niches. These analyses revealed small to moderate levels of genetic and phenotypic distinctiveness with symmetric gene flow across the contact area at the Chinese coast. The two species diverged approximately half a million years ago in dynamical isolation and secondary contact due to cycling sea level changes between the Eastern and Southern China Sea in the mid-late Pleistocene. We found evidence of character displacement and ecological niche differentiation between the two species, invoking the role of selection in facilitating divergence despite gene flow. These findings imply that the ecology can indeed counter gene flow through divergent selection and thus contribute to incipient speciation in these plovers. Furthermore, our study highlights the importance of using integrative datasets to reveal the evolutionary history and underlying mechanisms of speciation.

evolutionary biology

Demographic causes of adult sex ratio variation and their consequences for parental cooperation

The adult sex ratio (ASR) is a fundamental concept in population biology, sexual selection, and social evolution. However, it remains unclear which demographic processes generate ASR variation and how biases in ASR in turn affect social behaviour. Here, we evaluate the demographic mechanisms shaping ASR and their consequences for parental cooperation using detailed survival, fecundity, and behavioural data on 6,119 individuals from six wild shorebird populations exhibiting flexible parental strategies. We show that these closely related populations express strikingly different ASRs, despite having similar ecologies and life histories, and that ASR variation is largely driven by sex differences in the apparent survival of juveniles. Furthermore, families in populations with biased ASRs were predominantly tended by a single parent, suggesting that parental cooperation breaks down with unbalanced sex ratios. Taken together, our results indicate that sex biases emerging during early life have profound consequences for social behaviour.

ecology

Adult sex ratio bias in snowy plovers is driven by sex-specific early survival: implications for mating systems and population growth

Adult sex ratio (ASR) is a central concept in population biology and a key factor in sexual selection, yet why do most demographic models ignore sex-biases? Vital rates often vary between the sexes and across life history, but their relative contributions to ASR variation remain poorly understood--an essential step to evaluate sex ratio theories in the wild and inform conservation. Here we combine structured two-sex population models with individual-based mark-recapture data from an intensively monitored polygamous population of snowy plovers. We show that a strongly male-biased ASR is primarily driven by sex-specific survival of juveniles, rather than adults or dependent offspring. This provides empirical support for theories of unbiased sex allocation when sex-differences in survival arise after the period of parental investment. Importantly, a conventional model ignoring sex-biases significantly overestimated population viability. We suggest that sex-specific population models are essential to understand the population dynamics of sexual organisms: reproduction and population growth is most sensitive to perturbations in survival of the limiting sex. Overall, our study suggests that sex-biased early survival may contribute towards mating system evolution and population persistence, with implications for both sexual selection theory and biodiversity conservation.\n\nSIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTSex biases are widespread in nature and represent a fundamental component of sexual selection and population biology--but at which point in life history do these biases emerge? Here we report a detailed individual-based demographic analysis of an intensively studied wild bird population to evaluate the origins of sex biases and their consequences on mating strategies and population dynamics. We document a strongly male-biased adult sex ratio, which is consistent with behavioral observations of female-biased polygamy. Notably, sex-biased juvenile, rather than adult survival, contributed most to the adult sex ratio. Sex-biases also strongly influenced population viability, which was significantly overestimated when sex ratio and mating system were ignored. Our study therefore has implications for both sexual selection theory and biodiversity conservation.

ecology