bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Sykes, A. L.

Publications and source records attributed to Sykes, A. L..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Identifying control strategies to eliminate African swine fever from the United States swine industry in under 12 months

With the rising risk of African swine fever (ASF) introduction into the U.S., there is substantial emphasis on preparation for an epidemic to mitigate the economic and societal impacts. Mathematical models represent a vital tool for simulating future epidemics and examining the effectiveness of response strategies. This study expands on our spatially explicit stochastic compartmental farm-level transmission model, PigSpread-ASF, to identify the control strategies necessary to eliminate ASF from domestic swine populations in three, six, nine, and twelve months. We achieved this by incrementally increasing the intensity of the control actions detailed in the USDAs national response plan, which consists of i) quarantine and depopulation of detected farms; ii) a 72-hour movement standstill; iii) contact tracing with subsequent diagnostic testing; and iv) the implementation of control areas (infected and buffer zone) and surveillance zones (including routine diagnostic testing, pre-permit testing and movement restrictions). For this model, ASF was deemed eliminated after three consecutive months of no new ASF cases following each time period, as determined by WOAH. Our results indicate that the current national response plan would need to i) increase radii and duration of control areas and surveillance zones, ii) extend the traceback and quarantine for contact farms; iii) extend the movement standstill; iv) prohibit repopulation of depopulated farms; and v) quicker baseline detection of ASF, at varying intensities, to eliminate ASF within three, six, nine and twelve months. The elimination of ASF in 12-months required extension of the buffer zone radius to 5 km and maintenance of the control areas and surveillance zones for 60 days, a traceback and quarantine of 60 and 30 days for the contact tracing, and a standstill of 30 days. In contrast, the three-month scenario required extension of the infected zone, buffer zone and surveillance zone radii to 20 km each and maintenance of the control area and surveillance zones for 90 days, a traceback and quarantine of 90 days for contact tracing, and a standstill of 90 days. By intensifying the current national response plan, ASF would likely be eliminated within 12-months of its introduction. However, it is pertinent to consider the limitations posed by resource capacities and the impact that intensifying control may have on business continuity. Nevertheless, our study provides beneficial guidance to aid preparation for a future ASF introduction and estimates the infrastructure and personnel required to bring an epidemic under control promptly.

ecology↗

Estimating sampling and laboratory capacity for a simulated African swine fever outbreak in the United States

The introduction of African swine fever virus (ASFV) into uninfected countries can impact economic and animal welfare. Rapid detection and control of the outbreak contribute to successful eradication and promote business continuity. We developed a model to determine the number of samples, sample collectors, laboratory capacity, and processing times following an ASFV introduction into the U.S. We simulated the spread of ASFV in one densely populated swine region, generating a median of 27 (range = 1-68) outbreaks in 150 days, resulting 616 (range = 1-15,011) sampling events with a total of 3,068 barns (range = 7-69,118) sampled. We calculated the total sample collectors needed, considering daily working hours, sampling and driving time, and laboratory capabilities with and without blood sample pooling. Samples included 31 blood samples and five oral fluid samples per barn, which equal 84,830 (range = 52-2,066,831) and 14,195 (range = 10-345,590) blood and oral fluid samples, respectively. The median number of sample collectors needed to prevent sampling delay varied from 136 to 367 and, in the worst epidemic scenarios, from 833 to 3,115. Notably, excluding downtime-which prevented the sampler from visiting additional farms for 24 or 72 hours-reduced the number of sample collectors needed between 28% and 75%, while switching from blood to oral fluid samples reduced this number between 47% and 75%. At a laboratory processing daily capacity of 1,000 samples, the median days for sample processing without pooling were 92 days, with a maximum of 5.7 years. We demonstrated a need to redistribute 10,062 (range = 2-67,940) unprocessed samples daily to other laboratories to prevent processing delays. Our study addresses the challenge of efficiently organizing resources for managing a potential ASFV outbreak, providing information about the number of sample collectors and laboratory capacity needed for one densely populated swine region in the U.S.

ecology↗