bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Suter, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Suter, S..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Towards Scaling-Up Three-Dimensional Habitat Structural Measurements with Multi-Sensor Remote Sensing

Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) captures fine-scaled three-dimensional measurements of ecosystem structure, supporting monitoring of the Essential Biodiversity Variables (EBVs). Yet employing TLS across landscapes remains challenging in remote and topographically complex areas. Remote sensing provides a potential pathway for upscaling TLS-derived structural metrics, but to what extent is unquantified particularly in heterogenous environments, like oceanic islands. Here, we investigated the ability of remote sensing to estimate TLS-derived habitat structure across three contrasting habitats (lowland rainforest, montane cloud forest, and subalpine summit scrub) on La Reunion island. Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2, and Aerial LiDAR (ALS) data were acquired over plots where TLS was completed. We derived defined indices of backscatter coefficients, vegetation indices, and LiDAR metrics and assessed their alignment with TLS measurements using a Procrustes analysis. Subsequently, we used General Additive Models to estimate TLS habitat structure from remote sensing variables. Sentinel-2 exhibited the highest multivariate alignment with TLS (r = 0.51). TLS measurements of horizontal and vertical structure were estimated with the highest cross-validated predictive accuracy (R2 0.39 - 0.73), whilst structural complexity metrics were estimated with greater difficulty (R2 0.02 - 0.20). Multi-sensor models outperformed all single-sensor models in prediction estimates. Model performance also varied across habitats, with the highest agreement between predicted and observed values in the lowland rainforest (r = 0.38), and the lowest agreement (r = 0.35) in the montane cloud forest. Yet the dominant structural feature of each habitat was most accurately captured with remote sensing. Our results demonstrate the potential of integrating multi-sensor remote sensing data to upscale key dimensions of TLS-derived ecosystem structure but remains challenging for fine-scale structural complexity. These findings highlight both the potential and constraints of remote sensing for developing scalable, long-term monitoring frameworks for EBVs, especially in structurally complex and underrepresented island ecosystems.

ecology↗

How big is enough? Movement-informed zoning for African swine fever mitigation

O_LIAfrican swine fever (ASF) poses a serious threat to domestic pigs and wild boar populations. Wild boar can disperse the virus, making effective containment crucial. One of the main control strategies involves establishing restricted zones around detected cases, i.e., areas with temporary restrictions on access and hunting; however, determining the appropriate size of these zones remains a major challenge. C_LIO_LITo inform the size of restricted zones, we analyzed GPS data from 527 wild boar across 46 European study sites using a two-step approach combining first-passage time analysis and survival modelling to quantify the risk of wild boar leaving areas of different radii (i.e., spatial scales). We investigated how the risk of leaving varied over time and across environmental gradients. To go further, we used our model findings to develop an online application that generates predictive maps of optimal buffer sizes for ASF management at the European scale, based on a given risk threshold (the maximum acceptable probability that a wild boar leaves the area). C_LIO_LIWe found that the relationship between radius and the risk of leaving is negative exponential, and the risk of leaving increased over time, with a more rapid increase for smaller radii. Landscape homogeneity, terrain ruggedness and human impact increased the risk of leaving, with stronger effects at small scales. Contrary to other predictors, agricultural cover exerted a strong effect on risk of leaving over large spatial scales, especially when it was abundant. C_LIO_LIAcross Europe, a buffer radius of [~]8 km is likely sufficient around high-risk infection zones in most areas (considering an infectious period of 14 days and a risk threshold of 5%); however, in certain areas, a radius of up to 20 km may be needed to effectively limit wild boar movement. C_LIO_LISynthesis and applications: Our results highlight the need for adaptive, context-specific restricted zones. Buffers of 8 km around ASF-affected areas can limit the risk of infected wild boar dispersal, but they may be reduced to 5 km in highly heterogeneous landscapes or high-human impacted areas. Larger buffers may be required in agricultural landscapes. We provide spatially explicit outputs (optimal buffer sizes) that can directly inform policy and wildlife disease response strategies. The approach can be adapted to any other infectious disease. C_LI

ecology↗