Biology subjects

Sukhodolsky, D. G.

Publications and source records attributed to Sukhodolsky, D. G..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Multimodal Connectome Markers of Disruptive Behavior Problems in Youth: Distinct Patterns of Concurrent Severity and Prospective Symptom Change

Disruptive behaviors problems, such as irritability/anger and maladaptive aggression, are associated with altered connectivity across networks supporting emotion regulation. However, multimodal connectome markers of concurrent severity and prospective symptom change, including sex-specific patterns, remain unclear. Using a large, sex-balanced sample from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study, we applied multimodal connectome-based predictive modelling (CPM) to test whether resting-state functional (n = 7,556; 49.3% female) and structural (N = 8,978; 48.4%) connectivity predicted baseline disruptive behavior severity (at ages 9-10) and 2-year symptom change (from ages 9-10 to 11-12). Models were adjusted for covariates, permutation-tested, and FDR corrected. Secondary analyses tested sex-stratified models separately in males and females. In models emerging as significant, follow-up analyses tested for distinct vs shared predictive edges. Functional and structural connectomes predicted baseline severity ({rho} = 0.087 and {rho} = 0.071, respectively). Functional connectivity also predicted prospective symptom change ({rho} = 0.038), whereas prospective structural prediction was predominately with negative edges ({rho} = 0.026). Functional connectivity models were significant in both sexes, while prospective structural connectivity models were significant in males, but not females. Frontoparietal, medial frontal, sensorimotor, salience, cerebellar, and visual networks contributed across models. Cross-sectional models showed a more distributed pattern while prospective models showed a more focal pattern. These findings identify complementary, largely distinct functional and structural connectome patterns associated with current disruptive behavior risk and subsequent symptom change, supporting the importance of developmental timing, sex, and imaging modality in developing brain-based biomarkers of disruptive behavior risk in youth.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2026

Brain Age in Conduct Disorder: A Mega-Analysis of the ENIGMA Antisocial Behavior Working Group

Conduct disorder (CD) is the leading global cause of mental health burden in children and adolescents and has recently been hypothesized to be a neurodevelopmental disorder. Although prior research has identified neuroanatomical differences associated with CD, it remains unclear whether these differences reflect atypical brain development. Here, we investigated the difference between an individuals brain age and chronological age as a proxy for variations in brain maturation. Using a pretrained model, we estimated brain age from structural neuroimaging data obtained from 1,119 youth with CD and 1,183 typically developing controls across 14 international cohorts participating in the ENIGMA-Antisocial Behavior Working Group. Youth with CD exhibited a statistically robust but small acceleration in brain age compared to typically developing youth (around 0.50 years), which was restricted to the adolescence-onset subtype of the disorder. Our large-scale, coordinated analysis provides the first evidence of accelerated neurodevelopment as a potential mechanism underlying CD.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2025

Dynamic Resting-State Network Markers of Disruptive Behavior Problems in Youth

BackgroundChildhood disruptive behavior problems are linked to aberrant integrity within large-scale cognitive control networks. However, it is unclear if transitory or dynamic variation in the functional brain architecture is a marker of disruptive behavior problems. The current study tested whether functional connectivity across dynamic networks is distinctly associated with the transdiagnostic symptom domain of disruptive behavior problems in children. MethodsParticipants were aged 9-10 years from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study, who completed resting-state fMRI (N=877). We employed a dynamic connectivity approach leveraging a hidden semi-Markov model (HSMM) to identify transient properties of brain networks and states. Models estimated the time spent in each state (occupancy time) and the number of consecutive timepoints in a state (dwell time) for each participant. Linear regression models were utilized to identify distinct associations between dynamic properties (occupancy and sojourn times) and severity of disruptive behavior problems, accounting for other commonly co-occurring symptoms. ResultsDynamic network markers of disruptive behavior problems included increased time in network states characterized by globally aberrant connectivity patterns in circuitry involved in cognitive control including frontoparietal and dorsal attention networks. Replication of findings was found in a held-out sample of resting-state fMRI runs in which greater severity of disruptive behavior problems was uniquely linked to greater occupancy time in similarly characterized brain states. ConclusionTransdiagnostic, dynamic resting-state markers of disruptive behavior problems in youth may assist in the development of brain-based biomarkers for monitoring treatment outcomes, assessing circuit target engagement and informing clinical decisions.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2024

Transdiagnostic Symptom Domains are Associated with Head Motion During Multimodal Imaging in Children

BackgroundHead motion is a challenge for neuroimaging research in developmental populations. However, it is unclear how transdiagnostic symptom domains including attention, disruptive behavior (e.g., externalizing behavior), and internalizing problems are linked to scanner motion in children, particularly across structural and functional MRI. The current study examined whether transdiagnostic domains of attention, disruptive behavior, and internalizing symptoms are associated with scanner motion in children during multimodal imaging. MethodsIn a sample of 9,045 children aged 9-10 years in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study, logistic regression and linear mixed-effects models were used to examine associations between motion and behavior. Motion was indexed using ABCD Study quality control metrics and mean framewise displacement for the following: T1-weighted structural, resting-state fMRI, diffusion MRI, Stop-Signal Task, Monetary Incentive Delay task, and Emotional n-Back task. The Child Behavior Checklist was used as a continuous measure of symptom severity. ResultsGreater attention and disruptive behavior problem severity was associated with a lower likelihood of passing motion quality control across several imaging modalities. In contrast, increased internalizing severity was associated with a higher likelihood of passing motion quality control. Increased attention and disruptive behavior problem severity was also associated with increased mean motion, whereas increased internalizing problem severity was associated with decreased mean motion. ConclusionTransdiagnostic domains emerged as predictors of motion in youths. These findings have implications for advancing development of generalizable and robust brain-based biomarkers, computational approaches for mitigating motion effects, and enhancing accessibility of imaging protocols for children with varying symptom severities.

neuroscience↗