bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Suarez-Mendez, I.

Publications and source records attributed to Suarez-Mendez, I..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Multiscale Detrended Cross-Correlation Coefficient: Estimating Coupling in Nonstationary Neurophysiological Signals

The brain consists of a vastly interconnected network of regions, the connectome. By estimating the statistical interdependence of neurophysiological time series, we can measure the functional connectivity (FC) of this connectome. Pearsons correlation (rP) is a common metric of coupling in FC studies. Yet rP does not account properly for the non-stationarity of the signals recorded in neuroimaging. In this study, we introduced a novel estimator of coupled dynamics termed multiscale detrended cross-correlation coefficient (MDC3). Firstly, we showed that MDC3 had higher accuracy compared to rP using simulated time series with known coupling, as well as simulated functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) signals with known underlying structural connectivity. Next, we computed functional brain networks based on empirical magnetoencephalography (MEG) and fMRI. We found that by using MDC3 we could construct networks of healthy populations with significantly different properties compared to rP networks. Based on our results, we believe that MDC3 is a valid alternative to rP that should be incorporated in future FC studies. Author SummaryThe brain consists of a vastly interconnected network of regions. To estimate the connection strength of such networks the coupling between different brain regions should be calculated. This can be achieved by using a series of statistical methods that capture the connection strength between signals originating across the brain, one of them being Pearsons correlation (rP). Despite its benefits, rP is not suitable for realistic estimation of brain network architecture. In this study, we introduced a novel estimator called multiscale detrended cross-correlation coefficient (MDC3). Firstly, we showed that MDC3 was more accurate than rP using simulated signals with known connection strength, as well as simulated brain activity emerging from realistic brain simulations. Next, we constructed brain networks based on real-life brain activity, recorded using two different methodologies. We found that by using MDC3 we could construct networks of healthy populations with significantly different properties compared to rP networks. Based on our results, we believe that MDC3 is a valid alternative to rP that should be incorporated in future studies of brain networks.

neuroscience↗

The more, the merrier: multivariate phase synchronization methods excel pairwise ones in estimating brain connectivity from reconstructed neural sources

The estimation of functional connectivity (FC) from electro-(EEG) or magnetoencephalographic (MEG) recordings suffers from low spatial resolution, being one of the reasons for the reduced number of sensors compared to the number of reconstructed sources of activity. This problem can be avoided by estimating FC between larger regions instead of individual sources. However, combining all the sources in each area to produce a single time series per region is far from trivial. We have used simultaneous EEG/MEG data from 11 participants and compared the FC estimates from both techniques by using different multivariate approaches. Since the underlying generators are identical for EEG and MEG, the more similar the FC estimation from both techniques is, the more accurate it is likely to be. The results show that using either the average or the root-mean-square of the bivariate source-to-source FC estimates consistently outperforms the use of a representative time series from each area. We concluded that the reconstructed activity in each brain region is too complex to be reduced to a single representative time series and that full multivariate approaches must be used to describe between-area FC from electrophysiological recordings accurately. Moreover, the high correlation between the FC values estimated from EEG and MEG suggests that the results found in the high-sensitivity, low-noise MEG can be transferable to the more affordable EEG, at least when high-quality source reconstruction is used.

bioengineering↗