bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Stropp, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Stropp, J..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Impacts of taxonomic change on the Amazonian palm flora

Although taxonomy is an evolving discipline, taxonomic change is rarely accounted for in macroecological studies. By tracking the history of species descriptions and synonymizations of more than 800 names of Amazonian palms, we reveal shifts in species counts across space and time, the factors associated with taxonomic lumping, and the time needed to detect synonyms. The 175 Amazonian palm species known to date are the result of a gradual accumulation of new descriptions and a few distinct revisions events that led to the recognition of approximately 800 heterotypic synonyms. Most of these synonyms were detected after the mid-1990s and caused an 80% decrease in species counts within just three decades. The time to detect synonyms ranged from 3 to 227 years. Species with a large population, widespread distribution, and those described early were more frequently lumped. This suggests undetected synonyms inflate species richness unevenly across taxa and regions. Our study highlights how much taxonomic revisions can affect our understanding of biodiversity. Without them, we risk building our ecological analyses and conservation assessments on shaky ground.

ecology↗

Do aposematic species have larger range sizes? A case study with Neotropical poison frogs

AimAposematic animals, i.e. those that are defended and warn potential predators through signals, are suggested to have resource-gathering advantages against non-aposematic ones. We here explore this in a biogeographic frame expecting that aposematic species are better dispersers, which translates into larger geographic range size. LocationSouth America. TaxonPoison frogs (Amphibia; Aromobatidae and Dendrobatidae). MethodsWe use 43 toxic and 26 non-toxic poison frog species from the lowlands only as representatives of aposematic and non-aposematic study organisms, respectively. Realized and potential geographic ranges are calculated using minimum convex polygon and species distribution modelling methods, respectively. Accounting for species body size and phylogeny, we test if both range and aposematism are correlated using linear mixed models. ResultsAposematic and non-aposematic species do neither differ in realized nor in potential geographic range size. There was no effect of body size. Main conclusionsThe role of aposematism yet is not as clear as suggested and determinants of poison frog range sizes are multifaceted. A more integrative approach is needed using information of behaviour, predation risk, and reproductive biology to assess the role of aposematism on observed species distributions. Such data are not yet available for most species, neither poison frogs nor other aposematic animals.

ecology↗