bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Stratigos, A. J.

Publications and source records attributed to Stratigos, A. J..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Genomic correlates of metastatic competence and progression in human melanoma

Genomic events and their timing that grant a primary tumour the competence to disseminate remain poorly defined. We performed sequencing of 247 stage I/II primary cutaneous melanomas (CMs) and 60 matched metastases without intervening therapy from a prospectively followed registry cohort with a median followup of 92 months, integrating copy-number, mutational, protein and spatial-transcriptomic analyses. Relapse was not distinguished by oncogenic point mutations, which were largely shared between primaries and metastases, but by somatic copy-number alterations (SCNAs) and global chromosomal instability. We defined OncoCycle, a six-gene copy-number signature (amplification of CDK4, MCL1 and CD276; biallelic loss of CDKN2A, CDKN2B and TP53BP1) that predicted relapse independently of established clinicopathological features in melanoma, and a pan-cancer analysis. In matched pairs, metastatic progression was driven by continued copy-number evolution and reduction in intra-tumoural heterogeneity, rather than by acquired point mutations, and OncoCycle alterations from primary tumours were preserved in metastasis seeding clones. Clonal reconstruction revealed both monoclonal and polyclonal metastasis seeding, and spatial transcriptomics resolved copy-number-defined metastatic subclones occupying and programming distinct immune and stromal niches. Thus, metastatic competence was primed early by focal SCNAs on a background of chromosomal instability, elaborated by continued copy-number evolution during dissemination and spatio-temporal interactions with the tumour-microenvironment.

genomics↗

Immune cell senescence drives responsiveness to immunotherapy in melanoma

AbstractBackground: Immunotherapy has significantly improved cancer treatment. However, it is not effective in all cancer patients, rendering the need to further delineate the differences among responders and non-responders at the molecular and cellular level. Unresponsiveness to immunotherapy has been attributed to dysfunctional immune cell states such as T-cell exhaustion and anergy, whereas the contribution of cellular senescence remains elusive. Herein, we have investigated the role of immune cell senescence in the response to checkpoint inhibitors in melanomas where these immunotherapies are applied as a first line treatment. Methods: Two senescence detecting complementary approaches were utilized in a case control study we conducted. First, we implemented a senescence molecular signature we developed, termed "SeneVick" retrospectively in a single cell RNA-seq dataset from melanoma patients who received immunotherapy. Prior to this analysis, the signature was extensively validated in a variety of cell/tissue contexts, senescence types and species. Second, cellular senescence was assessed via an established experimental algorithmic approach in circulating immune cells of an analogous melanoma clinical cohort. Results: Melanoma patients who did not respond to immunotherapy exhibited increased cellular senescence in their CD8+ T-cells, CD4+ T-cells, B-cells and NK cells compared to responders. This phenomenon was independent of patients age and not an outcome of immunotherapy, in contrast to conventional anti-cancer treatments. Interestingly, alterations of cell-cell interactions among the immune sub-populations in non-responders compared to responders were identified, suggesting the involvement of immune cell senescence in defective immune responses and treatment failure. Conclusion: Overall, our findings support cellular senescence of the immune cell compartment within the TME, as a potent determinant of the response to immunotherapy and pave the way for strategies targeting immune cell senescence, as promising approaches to improve the outcome of such interventions.

immunology↗

A Strategy for Large-Scale Systematic Pan-Cancer Germline Rare Variation Analysis

Traditionally, genetic studies in cancer are focused on somatic mutations found in tumors and absent from the normal tissue. Identification of shared attributes in germline variation could aid discrimination of high-risk from likely benign mutations and narrow the search space for new cancer predisposing genes. Extraordinary progress made in analysis of common variation with GWAS methodology does not provide sufficient resolution to understand rare variation. To fulfil missing classification for rare germline variation we assembled datasets of whole exome sequences from >2,000 patients with different types of cancers: breast cancer, colon cancer and cutaneous and ocular melanomas matched to more than 7,000 non-cancer controls and analyzed germline variation in known cancer predisposing genes to identify common properties of disease associated mutations and new candidate cancer susceptibility genes. Lists of all cancer predisposing genes were divided into subclasses according to the mode of inheritance of the related cancer syndrome or contribution to known major cancer pathways. Out of all subclasses only genes linked to dominant syndromes presented significant rare germline variants enrichment in cases. Separate analysis of protein-truncating and missense variation in this subclass of genes confirmed significant prevalence of protein-truncating variants in cases only in loss-of-function tolerant genes (pLI<0.1), while ultra-rare missense mutations were significantly overrepresented in cases only in constrained genes (pLI>0.9). Taken together, our findings provide insights into the distribution and types of mutations underlying inherited cancer predisposition.

genetics↗