bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Strande, N. T.

Publications and source records attributed to Strande, N. T..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

One-Size-Fits-Many: Antisense oligonucleotides for rescuing splicing mutations in hotspot exons

Mutations that impact splicing play a significant role in disease etiology but are not fully understood. To characterize the impact of exonic variants on splicing in 71 clinically-actionable disease genes in asymptomatic people, we analyzed 32,112 exonic mutations from ClinVar and Geisinger MyCode using a minigene reporter assay. We identify 1,733 splice-disrupting mutations, of which the most extreme 1-2% of variants are likely to be deleterious. We report that these variants are not distributed evenly across exons but are mostly concentrated in the [~]8% of exons that are most susceptible to splicing mutations (i.e. hotspot exons). We demonstrate that splicing defects in these exons can be reverted by ASOs targeting the splice sites of either their upstream or downstream flanking exons. This finding supports the feasibility of developing single therapeutic ASOs that could revert all splice-altering variants localized to a particular exon.

molecular biology↗

Evaluating the clinical validity of gene-disease associations: an evidence-based framework developed by the Clinical Genome Resource

With advances in genomic sequencing technology, the number of reported gene-disease relationships has rapidly expanded. However, the evidence supporting these claims varies widely, confounding accurate evaluation of genomic variation in a clinical setting. Despite the critical need to differentiate clinically valid relationships from less well-substantiated relationships, standard guidelines for such evaluation do not currently exist. The NIH-funded Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) has developed a framework to define and evaluate the clinical validity of gene-disease pairs across a variety of Mendelian disorders. In this manuscript we describe a proposed framework to evaluate relevant genetic and experimental evidence supporting or contradicting a gene-disease relationship, and the subsequent validation of this framework using a set of representative gene-disease pairs. The framework provides a semi-quantitative measurement for the strength of evidence of a gene-disease relationship which correlates to a qualitative classification: \"Definitive\", \"Strong\", \"Moderate\", \"Limited\", \"No Reported Evidence\" or \"Conflicting Evidence.\" Within the ClinGen structure, classifications derived using this framework are reviewed and confirmed or adjusted based on clinical expertise of appropriate disease experts. Detailed guidance for utilizing this framework and access to the curation interface is available on our website. This evidence-based, systematic method to assess the strength of gene-disease relationships will facilitate more knowledgeable utilization of genomic variants in clinical and research settings.

genetics↗