Dissociable Stimulus- and Response-Driven Serial Dependence Effects in Auditory, Visual, and Audiovisual Motion Judgments
Efficient motion perception requires integrating immediate sensory evidence with internal representations shaped by experience. This influence of recent history can produce serial dependence effects (SDEs), in which current judgments are biased toward or away from the source of previous information. We examined SDEs in auditory, visual, and cued audiovisual motion-direction discrimination using aggregate psychometric measures and trial-level generalized linear mixed-effects models (GLMMs), which estimated the independent contributions of the previous stimulus direction and the participant's previous response. Participants completed unisensory (n=57) and cued audiovisual (n=48) motion-discrimination tasks. Aggregate analyses indicated attractive SDEs in auditory conditions, repulsive SDEs in visual conditions, and no net SDE in the audiovisual-cued condition. Trial-level modeling revealed a more nuanced structure: previous stimulus direction produced repulsive effects in both unisensory conditions, with previous visual direction influencing judgments across all conditions containing visual motion, whereas previous response produced attractive effects only when visual information was task-relevant. In the audiovisual-cued condition, the absence of a net psychometric shift was consistent with the opposing influences of an attractive response-history effect and a repulsive visual stimulus-history effect rather than an absence of serial dependence. These findings suggest that serial dependence in motion perception reflects dissociable and concurrently operating processes, including a predominantly visual, adaptation-like stimulus-history effect and a task-dependent, decision-related response-history effect.