bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Storey, J. D.

Publications and source records attributed to Storey, J. D..

13 recordsLinked to original sources

A test for linkage disequilibrium in structured populations

Quantifying patterns of dependence between distinct loci, known as linkage disequilibrium (LD), is vital for identifying locus-trait associations and studying evolution. LD is well understood when individuals are sampled from a population where Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) holds at each locus. However, population structure is nearly ubiquitous in human populations, leading to significant deviations from HWE and inducing correlations between loci that mimic LD. These confounding signals represent an ongoing challenge when characterizing LD for individuals sampled from large human datasets. To address this, we develop a hypothesis test for a quantity we call structural LD, defined as LD after accounting for population structure. Our test accommodates arbitrarily complex structure using individual-specific allele frequencies, which are possibly distinct for every SNP-individual pair. This formalization is highly general and encompasses a wide range of established models, including admixture. We validate the performance of our proposed method on both simulated genotypes and existing human studies, including data characterized by highly complex structure and recent admixture. Our analyses of human studies indicates that most long-range LD in human populations can be accounted for by well-fit models of population structure.

genomics↗

A generalized test of genotype-phenotype causality in population-sampled nuclear families

We recently developed a causal inference framework and test -- the Transmission Mean Test (TMT) -- to identify causal genotype-phenotype relationships in population-sampled parent-child trios, where one child per family is observed. Here, we establish the generalized TMT (gTMT) for population-sampled nuclear families, allowing multiple offspring per family. This extension focuses on detecting genetic loci with non-zero average causal effects (ACE) on child phenotypes, taking into account that siblings share similar random family-specific effects. We construct a potential outcomes trait model that considers both individual-level and family-level heterogeneity, captures additive and non-additive genetic effects, and accommodates both quantitative (continuous or count) and dichotomous traits. We design an unbiased estimate dgTMT of the ACE and develop a sampling variance estimate [Formula] to form a statistic testing the null hypothesis of no causal effect. We provide both theory and empirical evidence demonstrating that gTMT is robust to confounding factors such as the population structure and family-specific effects. We analyze nuclear families in the UK Biobank as an illustrative example of the gTMT in action. When parental genotypes are missing, we propose to further extend gTMT by using Bayesian calculations on child genotypes to model parental genotypes as intermediate random variables.

genetics↗

Coancestry superposed on admixed populations yields measures of relatedness at individual-level resolution

The admixture model is widely applied to estimate and interpret population structure among individuals. Here we consider a "standard admixture" model that assumes the admixed populations are unrelated and also a generalized model, where the admixed populations themselves are related via coancestry (or covariance) of allele frequencies. The generalized model yields a potentially more realistic and substantially more flexible model that we call "super admixture". This super admixture model provides a one-to-one mapping in terms of probability moments with the population-level kinship model, the latter of which is a general model of genome-wide relatedness and structure based on identity-by-descent. We introduce a method to estimate the super admixture model that is based on method of moments, does not rely on likelihoods, is computationally efficient, and scales to massive sample sizes. We apply the method to several human data sets and show that the admixed populations are indeed substantially related, implying the proposed method captures a new and important component of evolutionary history and structure in the admixture model. We show that the fitted super admixture model estimates relatedness between all pairs of individuals at a resolution similar to the kinship model. The super admixture model therefore provides a tractable, forward generating probabilistic model of complex structure and relatedness that should be useful in a variety of scenarios.

genetics↗

Identifying causal genotype-phenotype relationships for population-sampled parent-child trios

The process by which genes are transmitted from parent to child provides a source of randomization preceding all other factors that may causally influence any particular child phenotype. Because of this, it is natural to consider genetic transmission as a source of experimental randomization. In this work, we show how parent-child trio data can be leveraged to identify causal genetic loci by modeling the randomization during genetic transmission. We develop a new test, the transmission mean test (TMT), together with its unbiased estimator of the average causal effect, and derive its causal properties within the potential outcomes framework. We also prove that the transmission disequilibrium test (TDT) is a test of causality as a complementary case of the TMT for the affected-only design. The TMT and the TDT differ in the types of traits that they can handle and the study designs for which they are appropriate. The TMT handles arbitrarily distributed traits and is appropriate when trios are randomly sampled; the TDT handles dichotomous traits and is appropriate when sampling is based on a childs trait status. We compare the transmission-based methods with established approaches for genotype-phenotype analyses to clarify conditions appropriate for each method, what conclusions can be drawn by each one, and how these methods can be used together.

genetics↗

New kinship and FST estimates reveal higher levels of differentiation in the global human population

Kinship coefficients and FST, which measure genetic relatedness and the overall population structure, respectively, have important biomedical applications. However, existing estimators are only accurate under restrictive conditions that most natural population structures do not satisfy. We recently derived new kinship and FST estimators for arbitrary population structures [1, 2]. Our estimates on human datasets reveal a complex population structure driven by founder effects due to dispersal from Africa and admixture. Notably, our new approach estimates larger FST values of 26% for native worldwide human populations and 23% for admixed Hispanic individuals, whereas the existing approach estimates 9.8% and 2.6%, respectively. While previous work correctly measured FST between subpopulation pairs, our generalized FST measures genetic distances among all individuals and their most recent common ancestor (MRCA) population, revealing that genetic differentiation is greater than previously appreciated. This analysis demonstrates that estimating kinship and FST under more realistic assumptions is important for modern population genetic analysis.

genetics↗

Determining sufficient sequencing depth in RNA-Seq differential expression studies

RNA-Seq studies require a sufficient read depth to detect biologically important genes. Sequencing below this threshold will reduce statistical power while sequencing above will provide only marginal improvements in power and incur unnecessary sequencing costs. Although existing methodologies can help assess whether there is sufficient read depth, they are unable to guide how many additional reads should be sequenced to reach this threshold. We provide a new method called superSeq that models the relationship between statistical power and read depth. We apply the superSeq framework to 393 RNA-Seq experiments (1,021 total contrasts) in the Expression Atlas and find the model accurately predicts the increase in statistical power gained by increasing the read depth. Based on our analysis, we find that most published studies (> 70%) are undersequenced, i.e., their statistical power can be improved by increasing the sequencing read depth. In addition, the extent of saturation is highly dependent on statistical methodology: only 9.5%, 29.5%, and 26.6% of contrasts are saturated when using DESeq2, edgeR, and limma, respectively. Finally, we also find that there is no clear minimum per-transcript read depth to guarantee saturation for an entire technology. Therefore, our framework not only delineates key differences among methods and their impact on determining saturation, but will also be needed even as technology improves and the read depth of experiments increases. Researchers can thus use superSeq to calculate the read depth to achieve required statistical power while avoiding unnecessary sequencing costs.

genomics↗

The optimal discovery procedure for significance analysis of general gene expression studies

Analysis of biological data often involves the simultaneous testing of thousands of genes. This requires two key steps: the ranking of genes and the selection of important genes based on a significance threshold. One such testing procedure, called the optimal discovery procedure (ODP), leverages information across different tests to provide an optimal ranking of genes. This approach can lead to substantial improvements in statistical power compared to other methods. However, current applications of the ODP have only been established for simple study designs using microarray technology. Here we extend this work to the analysis of complex study designs and RNA sequencing studies. We then apply our extended framework to a static RNA sequencing study, a longitudinal and an independent sampling time-series study, and an independent sampling dose-response study. We find that our method shows improved performance compared to other testing procedures, finding more differentially expressed genes and increasing power for enrichment analysis. Thus the extended ODP enables a superior significance analysis of genomic studies. The algorithm is implemented in our freely available R package called edge.

bioinformatics↗

Real-time in vivo Global Transcriptional Dynamics During Plasmodium falciparum Blood-stage Development

Genome-wide analysis of transcription in the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum has revealed robust variation in steady-state mRNA abundance throughout the 48-hour intraerythrocytic developmental cycle (IDC) suggesting that this process is highly dynamic and tightly regulated. However, the precise timing of mRNA transcription and decay remains poorly understood due to the utilization of methods that only measure total RNA and cannot differentiate between newly transcribed, decaying and stable cellular RNAs. Here we utilize rapid 4-thiouracil (4-TU) incorporation via pyrimidine salvage to specifically label, capture and quantify newly-synthesized P. falciparum RNA transcripts at every hour throughout the IDC following erythrocyte invasion. This high resolution global analysis of the transcriptome captures the timing and rate of transcription for each newly synthesized mRNA in vivo, revealing active transcription throughout all stages of the IDC. To determine the fraction of active transcription and/or transcript stabilization contributing to the total mRNA abundance at each timepoint we have generated a statistical model to fit the data for each gene which reveals varying degrees of transcription and stabilization for each mRNA corresponding to developmental transitions and independent of abundance profile. Finally, our results provide new insight into co-regulation of mRNAs throughout the IDC through regulatory DNA sequence motifs associated with these processes, thereby expanding our understanding of P. falciparum mRNA dynamics.

microbiology↗

The Functional False Discovery Rate with Applications to Genomics

The false discovery rate measures the proportion of false discoveries among a set of hypothesis tests called significant. This quantity is typically estimated based on p-values or test statistics. In some scenarios, there is additional information available that may be used to more accurately estimate the false discovery rate. We develop a new framework for formulating and estimating false discovery rates and q-values when an additional piece of information, which we call an \"informative variable\", is available. For a given test, the informative variable provides information about the prior probability a null hypothesis is true or the power of that particular test. The false discovery rate is then treated as a function of this informative variable. We consider two applications in genomics. Our first is a genetics of gene expression (eQTL) experiment in yeast where every genetic marker and gene expression trait pair are tested for associations. The informative variable in this case is the distance between each genetic marker and gene. Our second application is to detect differentially expressed genes in an RNA-seq study carried out in mice. The informative variable in this study is the per-gene read depth. The framework we develop is quite general, and it should be useful in a broad range of scientific applications.

genomics↗

Extending Tests of Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium to Structured Populations

Testing for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) is an important component in almost all analyses of population genetic data. Genetic markers that violate HWE are often treated as special cases; for example, they may be flagged as possible genotyping errors or they may be investigated more closely for evolutionary signatures of interest. The presence of population structure is one reason why genetic markers may fail a test of HWE. This is problematic because almost all natural populations studied in the modern setting show some degree of structure. Therefore, it is important to be able to detect deviations from HWE for reasons other than structure. To this end, we extend statistical tests of HWE to allow for population structure, which we call a test of \"structural HWE\" (sHWE). Additionally, our new test allows one to automatically choose tuning parameters and identify accurate models of structure. We demonstrate our approach on several important studies, provide theoretical justification for the test, and present empirical evidence for its utility. We anticipate the proposed test will be useful in a broad range of analyses of genome-wide population genetic data.

genomics↗

A nonparametric estimator of population structure unifying admixture models and principal components analysis

We introduce a simple and computationally efficient method for fitting the admixture model of genetic population structure, called ALStructure. The strategy of ALStructure is to first estimate the low-dimensional linear subspace of the population admixture components and then search for a model within this subspace that is consistent with the admixture models natural probabilistic constraints. Central to this strategy is the observation that all models belonging to this constrained space of solutions are risk-minimizing and have equal likelihood, rendering any additional optimization unnecessary. The low-dimensional linear subspace is estimated through a recently introduced principal components analysis method that is appropriate for genotype data, thereby providing a solution that has both principal components and probabilistic admixture interpretations. Our approach differs fundamentally from other existing methods for estimating admixture, which aim to fit the admixture model directly by searching for parameters that maximize the likelihood function or the posterior probability. We observe that ALStructure typically outperforms existing methods both in accuracy and computational speed under a wide array of simulated and real human genotype datasets. Throughout this work we emphasize that the admixture model is a special case of a much broader class of models for which algorithms similar to ALStructure may be successfully employed.

genomics↗

FST and kinship for arbitrary population structures I: Generalized definitions

FST is a fundamental measure of genetic differentiation and population structure, currently defined for subdivided populations. FST in practice typically assumes independent, non-overlapping subpopulations, which all split simultaneously from their last common ancestral population so that genetic drift in each subpopulation is probabilistically independent of the other subpopulations. We introduce a generalized FST definition for arbitrary population structures, where individuals may be related in arbitrary ways, allowing for arbitrary probabilistic dependence among individuals. Our definitions are built on identity-by-descent (IBD) probabilities that relate individuals through inbreeding and kinship coefficients. We generalize FST as the mean inbreeding coefficient of the individuals local populations relative to their last common ancestral population. We show that the generalized definition agrees with Wrights original and the independent subpopulation definitions as special cases. We define a novel coancestry model based on \"individual-specific allele frequencies\" and prove that its parameters correspond to probabilistic kinship coefficients. Lastly, we extend the Pritchard-Stephens-Donnelly admixture model in the context of our coancestry model and calculate its FST. To motivate this work, we include a summary of analyses we have carried out in follow-up papers, where our new approach has been applied to simulations and global human data, showcasing the complexity of human population structure, demonstrating our success in estimating kinship and FST, and the shortcomings of existing approaches. The probabilistic framework we introduce here provides a theoretical foundation that extends FST in terms of inbreeding and kinship coefficients to arbitrary population structures, paving the way for new estimators and novel analyses.\n\nNote: This article is Part I of two-part manuscripts. We refer to these in the text as Part I and Part II, respectively.\n\nPart I: Alejandro Ochoa and John D. Storey. \"FST and kinship for arbitrary population structures I: Generalized definitions\". bioRxiv (10.1101/083915) (2019). https://doi.org/10.1101/083915. First published 2016-10-27.\n\nPart II: Alejandro Ochoa and John D. Storey. \"FST and kinship for arbitrary population structures II: Method of moments estimators\". bioRxiv (10.1101/083923) (2019). https://doi.org/10.1101/083923. First published 2016-10-27.

genetics↗

FST and kinship for arbitrary population structures II: Method of moments estimators

FST and kinship are key parameters often estimated in modern population genetics studies in order to quantitatively characterize structure and relatedness. Kinship matrices have also become a fundamental quantity used in genome-wide association studies and heritability estimation. The most frequently used estimators of FST and kinship are method-of-moments estimators whose accuracies depend strongly on the existence of simple underlying forms of structure, such as the independent subpopulations model of non-overlapping, independently evolving subpopulations. However, modern data sets have revealed that these simple models of structure likely do not hold in many populations, including humans. In this work, we provide new results on the behavior of these estimators in the presence of arbitrarily complex population structures, which results in an improved estimation framework specifically designed for arbitrary population structures. After establishing a framework for assessing bias and consistency of genome-wide estimators, we calculate the accuracy of existing FST and kinship estimators under arbitrary population structures, characterizing biases and estimation challenges unobserved under their originally assumed models of structure. We then present our new approach, which consistently estimates kinship and FST when the minimum kinship value in the dataset is estimated consistently. We illustrate our results using simulated genotypes from an admixture model, constructing a one-dimensional geographic scenario that departs nontrivially from the independent subpopulations model. Our simulations reveal the potential for severe biases in estimates of existing approaches that are overcome by our new framework. This work may significantly improve future analyses that rely on accurate kinship and FST estimates.

genetics↗