Steury, T. D. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2026

First estimates of the population growth rate of the parasitic honey bee mite Tropilaelaps mercedesae in Apis mellifera colonies

A parasitic mite of honey bee brood (Tropilaelaps mercedesae), is spreading through populations of Apis mellifera honey bees in new regions and poses a major threat to honey bee health. Despite its clear threat, the biology of this mite is poorly understood, with gaps on such fundamental issues as how fast its populations can grow. This leaves the beekeeping world underprepared to plan for its arrival and management. In this study, we documented the growth of T. mercedesae populations in untreated A. mellifera colonies in Thailand and South Korea, and did the same for another parasitic mite (Varroa destructor) when possible. We found that the population growth of T. mercedesae was variable but could reach high levels (daily r of 0.010, 0.036, and 0.057), while the population growth of V. destructor (r = 0.021) matched previous estimates. Our results indicate that T. mercedesae populations can grow rapidly but they do not always attain this potential. Based on our results, humidity should be studied as a potential driver of population growth. If future work can reveal key drivers of T. mercedesae population growth, this would help predict infestations and help design management strategies that exploit the pests biological vulnerabilities.

zoology↗

bioRxiv2022

Does it pay to pay? A comparison of the benefits of open-access publishing across various sub-fields in Biology

Authors are often faced with the decision of whether to maximize impact or minimize costs when publishing the results of their research. For example, to potentially improve impact via increased accessibility, many subscription-based journals now offer the option of paying a fee to publish open access (i.e., hybrid journals), but this solution excludes authors who lack the capacity to pay to make their research accessible. Here, we tested if paying to publish open access in a subscriptionbased journal benefited authors by conferring more citations relative to closed access articles. We identified 146,415 articles published in 152 hybrid journals in the field of biology from 2013-2018 to compare the number of citations between various types of open access and closed access articles. In a simple generalized linear model analysis of our full dataset, we found that publishing open access in hybrid journals that offer the option confers an average citation advantage to authors of 17.8 citations compared to closed access articles in similar journals. After taking into account the number of authors, journal impact, year of publication, and subject area, we still found that open access generated significantly more citations than closed access (p < 0.0001). However, results were complex, with exact differences in citation rates among access types impacted by these other variables. This citation advantage based on access type was even similar when comparing open and closed access articles published in the same issue of a journal (p < 0.0001). However, by examining articles where the authors paid an article processing charge, we found that cost itself was not predictive of citation rates (p = 0.14). Based on our findings of access type and other model parameters, we suggest that, in most cases, paying for access does confer a citation advantage. For authors with limited budgets, we recommend pursuing open access alternatives that do not require paying a fee as they still yielded more citations than closed access. For authors who are considering where to submit their next article, we offer additional suggestions on how to balance exposure via citations with publishing costs.

scientific communication and education↗