bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Steffensen, A. K.

Publications and source records attributed to Steffensen, A. K..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Distinct systemic and gut IgA responses to bacteria of the human upper gastrointestinal tract

The mucosa lining the gastrointestinal tract harbors the bodys largest population of plasma cells, most of which produce dimeric IgA destined for release into the lumen. In addition, there is systemic production of monomeric IgA circulating in the blood. Little is known about the connection between systemic and mucosal IgA. To address this relationship and to explore antibody responses against the microbiota, we isolated bacteria from duodenal biopsies and assessed antibody reactivity. Systemic IgA showed reactivity to bacteria of the upper gastrointestinal tract with a preference for binding Neisseria species, while duodenal IgA showed broader reactivity. We found limited clonal overlap between gut and bone marrow plasma cells of individual donors, yet a few shared clones specific to bacterial antigens were identified. Despite showing clonal overlap, gut and bone marrow plasma cells have distinct IgA subclass distributions, and they likely depend on B-cell activation at discrete anatomical sites.

immunology↗

Evaluation of the rapidBACpro(R) II kit for the rapid identification of microorganisms directly from blood cultures using MALDI-TOF MS

ObjectivesIdentification of microorganisms directly from blood cultures (BCs) using MALDI-TOF MS has shown to be the application with most impact in this methodology. In this study, a novel commercial method, the rapidBACpro(R) II, was evaluated in four clinical microbiology laboratories. MethodsPositive blood culture samples (n=801) were processed using the rapidBACpro(R) II kit and then compared with routine gold standard. A subset of monomicrobial BCs (n=560) were analyzed in parallel with the Sepsityper(R) kit (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) and compared with the rapidBACpro(R) II kit. In addition, the rapidBACpro(R) II kit was also compared with two different in-house methods. ResultsOverall, 80.0% of the monomicrobial isolates (609/761) were correctly identified by the rapidBACpro(R) II kit at the species level (92.3% of the Gram negative and 72.4% of the Gram positive bacteria). The comparison with the Sepsityper(R) kit yielded higher rates of correct species-level identification provided by the rapidBACpro(R) II kit for all categories (p>0.0001) except for yeasts identified with score values >1.7. It also proved superior to the ammonium chloride method (p>0.0001) but the differential centrifugation method allowed higher rates of correct identification for Gram negative bacteria (p>0.1). ConclusionsThe rapidBACpro(R) II kit allowed a high rate of microorganisms correctly identified. The percentage of accurate species-level identification of Gram positive bacteria was particularly noteworthy in comparison with other commercial and in-house methods. This fact was especially interesting in the case of Staphylococcus sp. and Streptococcus sp. in order to elucidate their clinical impact, for example in device-associated bacteremia.

microbiology↗