bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Steenwijk, M. D.

Publications and source records attributed to Steenwijk, M. D..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Modeling of individual neurophysiological brain connectivity

IntroductionComputational models are often used to assess how functional connectivity (FC) patterns emerge from neuronal population dynamics and anatomical connections in the brain. However, group averaged data is often used in this context and it remains unclear whether individual predictions of FC patterns using this approach can be made. Here, we assess the value of using individualized structural data for simulation of individual whole-brain FC. MethodsThe Jansen and Rit neural mass model was employed, where masses were coupled using individual structural connectivity (SC) obtained from diffusion weighted imaging. Simulated FC was correlated to individual magnetoencephalography-derived empirical FC. FC was estimated using both phase-based (phase lag index (PLI), phase locking value (PLV)) and amplitude-based (amplitude envelope correlation (AEC)) metrics to analyze the goodness-of-fit of different metrics for individual predictions. Prediction of individual FC was compared against the prediction of group averaged FC. We further tested whether SC of a different participant could equally well predict a participants FC pattern. ResultsThe AEC provided a significantly better match between individually simulated and empirical FC than phase-based metrics. Simulations with individual SC provided higher correlations between simulated and empirical FC compared to using the group-averaged SC. However, using SC from other participants resulted in similar correlations between simulated and empirical FC compared to using participants own SC. DiscussionThis work underlines the added value of FC simulations based on individual instead of group-averaged SC, and could aid in a better understanding of mechanisms underlying individual functional network trajectories in neurological disease. Impact statementIn this work, we investigated how well individual empirical functional connectivity can be simulated using the individuals structural connectivity matrix combined with neural mass modeling. Our research highlights the potential added value of using individual simulations of functional connectivity, and could aid in a better understanding of mechanisms underlying individual functional network trajectories in neurological disease. Moreover, individualized prediction of disease trajectories could enhance patient care and may provide better treatment options.

neuroscience↗

Altered structural hub connectivity and its clinical relevance in glioma

Background and PurposeStructural network analysis of diffusion imaging is increasingly used to study neurological disease, its pathophysiology and symptoms. We therefore evaluate structural hub connectivity in glioma patients and its association with molecular subtype and clinical status.\n\nMaterials and MethodsUsing retrospective diffusion imaging, structural connectivity was investigated in 65 newly diagnosed glioma patients (36 males; mean age 52 {+/-} 14 years) and 60 healthy controls (23 males; mean age 50 {+/-} 7 years). Probabilistic tractography was performed between 39 cortical nodes per hemisphere. In patients, tumors were drawn in to exclude each tumor-containing voxel from analysis. As previous connectomic research in glioma and other neurological diseases has shown particular importance of hub nodes and connections, the numbers of connections between hubs, hubs and non-hubs, and non-hubs were calculated for each hemisphere separately. Clinical and molecular characteristics were assessed as part of routine clinical care. Group differences in connectivity and its associations with performance and molecular subtypes were tested non-parametrically through Mann-Whitney U-tests, corrected for multiple comparisons.\n\nResultsGlioma patients had more hub-related connections in the hemisphere contralateral to the tumor (hub-hub P = 0.002, hub-non-hub P = 0.005), despite being comparable to controls in terms of total and ipsilateral connections. Within patients, hub-related connectivity related to performance status (P = 0.009) and molecular subtype (P = 0.045).\n\nConclusionWe present experimental evidence for the relevance of structural connectomics as a tool to pick up on the clinical impact of glioma on the rest of the brain.

cancer biology↗