bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Staropoli, I.

Publications and source records attributed to Staropoli, I..

16 recordsLinked to original sources

Temperature-Dependent Replication and Sensitivity to Innate Immunity of Human Coronavirus HKU1

The human coronavirus HKU1, causing common colds and occasionally severe illness, remains largely uncharacterized because it has not been successfully grown on immortalized cells. Here, we identified Caco2 cells overexpressing TMPRSS2, the HKU1 receptor, as being highly permissive to infection. HKU1 replicated efficiently, formed syncytia and released infectious progeny in these cells at 33{degrees}C, the temperature of the nasal cavity, but was attenuated at 37{degrees}C. Viral entry occurred similarly at both temperatures, but subsequent viral RNA synthesis was enhanced at 33{degrees}C. Released virions displayed higher stability at 33{degrees}C. In Caco2 and primary epithelial nasal cells, HKU1 was sensitive to interferons (IFN), but induction of IFN stimulated genes, such as IFN-Induced Transmembrane Proteins (IFITMs), was delayed at 33{degrees}C. Once expressed, IFITMs comparably inhibited HKU1 fusion at both temperatures. In contrast, SARS-CoV-2 robustly replicated at 37{degrees}C. Thus, cellular permissiveness, innate immunity and viral properties collectively explain why HKU1 replicates more efficiently at nasal temperature. Our results highlight temperature-sensitivity disparities between coronaviruses, likely associated to different pathogenic outcomes.

microbiology↗

TMPRSS2 reduces antibody recognition of SARS-CoV-2 spike

The serine protease TMPRSS2 acts as a cofactor for SARS-CoV-2 entry by cleaving the viral spike (S) to initiate fusion. Whether TMPRSS2 has an impact on humoral immune response against S remains poorly characterized. Here, we show that TMPRSS2 impairs antibody binding to S. In S-expressing and infected cells, TMPRSS2 decreases monoclonal antibody (mAb) and immune serum binding, as well as antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) induction. Using a panel of 39 mAbs targeting various S regions, we observe that those binding to the S2 subunit are the most affected by TMPRSS2. TMPRSS2 promotes a partial shedding of S1 and changes S2 conformation. This processing reduces Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2) binding while increasing cell-cell fusion. We further observe that the capacity of TMPRSS2 to decrease antibody recognition is conserved across coronaviruses and shared with other TMPRSS proteins. However, TMPRSS2 expression in infected cells does not impact significantly virions infectivity or the antibody recognition, as measured by flow virometry. Collectively, our findings suggest that TMPRSS2 processing of S favors a fusion intermediate conformation which is less sensitive to antibody recognition.

immunology↗

Polyfunctionality of broadly reactive non-neutralizing SARS-CoV-2 RBD antibodies

SARS-CoV-2 antibodies targeting the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the spike protein can potently neutralize infection and exert additional antiviral functions. Here, we characterize the functional profiles of human RBD-specific memory B-cell antibodies elicited by ancestral SARS-CoV-2 infection. While SARS-CoV2 neutralizing antibodies, mainly class 1 and 3 anti-RBD antibodies, often lose binding and neutralizing capacities against Omicron variants, most non-neutralizers remain broadly reactive. Despite their restricted cross-reactivity, neutralizing antibodies mediate Fc-effector functions including antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, phagocytosis, and complement deposition. Most neutralizers also enhance binding of antibodies that target the SARS-CoV-2 spike fusion peptide via receptor-mimetic allostery. In contrast, broadly reactive non-neutralizers fail to trigger phagocytic or allosteric effects. Thus, viral escape compromises antibody neutralizing as well as other antiviral activities, leaving broadly reactive, non-polyfunctional antibodies that exert minimal immune pressure less effective at controlling infection.

immunology↗

Intranasal delivery of a broadly neutralizing single domain antibody targeting ACE2 protects against SARS-CoV-2 infection

SARS-CoV-2 accumulates mutations over time leading to the emergence of variants, which become largely resistant to existing vaccines and spike protein-targeted antiviral treatment. Therefore, there is a need for other therapies with broad efficiency. Here, we targeted the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), the major entry receptor for SARS-CoV-2. We purified three single domain heavy chain antibodies (VHHs) after immunization of an alpaca with the ectodomain of ACE2. These VHHs bound ACE2 with nanomolar affinity and specifically detected membrane-anchored ACE2. Two of them (B07 and B09) neutralized by a competitive mechanism multiple SARS-CoV-2 isolates, including Omicron variants (XBB.1.16.1; EG.5.1.3; BA.2.86.1), without impacting the proteolytic activity of the enzyme. Fusion of B07 with conventional Fc domain markedly improved its binding and neutralizing efficacy. This dimeric Fc-conjugated B07 (B07-Fc) recognized specific residues of the N-terminal helix 1 of ACE2. When administrated prophylactically and intranasally, B07-Fc induced a strong dose-dependent protection of mice expressing human ACE2 (K18-hACE2) from SARS-CoV-2 Omicron. Hamsters were weakly protected due to low binding of B07-Fc to hamster ACE2. These single domain antibodies targeting hACE2 represent potential broad-spectrum therapeutic candidates against any emerging viruses using ACE2 as a receptor. These inhalable neutralizing single domain antibodies also represent a non-invasive approach against respiratory viral infection.

microbiology↗

Escape of SARS-CoV-2 variants KP1.1, LB.1 and KP3.3 from approved monoclonal antibodies

First-generation anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) used for prophylaxis or therapeutic purposes in immunocompromised patients have been withdrawn because of the emergence of resistant Omicron variants. In 2024, two novel mAbs, Pemivibart and Sipavibart, have been approved by health authorities, but their activity against contemporary JN.1 sublineages is poorly characterized. We isolated authentic JN.1.1, KP1.1, LB.1 and KP3.3 viruses and evaluated their sensitivity to neutralization by these mAbs in two target cell lines. Compared to ancestral strains, Pemivibart remained moderately active against JN.1 sub-variants, with a strong increase of 50% Inhibitory Concentration (IC50), reaching up to 3 to 15 g/ml for KP3.3. Sipavibart neutralized JN.1.1 but lost antiviral efficacy against KP1.1, LB.1 and KP3.3. Our results highlight the need for a close clinical monitoring of Pemivibart and raise concerns about the clinical efficacy of Sipavibart.

immunology↗

Recapitulating memory B cell responses in a Lymphoid Organ-Chip to evaluate mRNA vaccine boosting strategies

Predicting the immunogenicity of candidate vaccines in humans remains a challenge. To address this issue, we developed a Lymphoid Organ-Chip (LO chip) model based on a microfluidic chip seeded with human PBMC at high density within a 3D collagen matrix. Perfusion of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein mimicked a vaccine boost by inducing a massive amplification of Spike-specific memory B cells, plasmablast differentiation, and Spike-specific antibody secretion. Features of lymphoid tissue, including the formation of activated CD4+ T cell/B cell clusters and the emigration of matured plasmablasts, were recapitulated in the LO chip. Importantly, myeloid cells were competent at capturing and expressing mRNA vectored by lipid nanoparticles, enabling the assessment of responses to mRNA vaccines. Comparison of on-chip responses to Wuhan monovalent and Wuhan/Omicron bivalent mRNA vaccine boosts showed equivalent induction of Omicron neutralizing antibodies, pointing at immune imprinting as reported in vivo. The LO chip thus represents a versatile platform suited to the preclinical evaluation of vaccine boosting strategies.

immunology↗

Distinct evolution of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron XBB and BA.2.86 lineages combining increased fitness and antibody evasion

The unceasing circulation of SARS-CoV-2 leads to the continuous emergence of novel viral sublineages. Here, we isolated and characterized XBB.1, XBB.1.5, XBB.1.9.1, XBB.1.16.1, EG.5.1.1, EG.5.1.3, XBF, BA.2.86.1 and JN.1 variants, representing >80% of circulating variants in January 2024. The XBB subvariants carry few but recurrent mutations in the spike, whereas BA.2.86.1 and JN.1 harbor >30 additional changes. These variants replicated in IGROV-1 but no longer in Vero E6 and were not markedly fusogenic. They potently infected nasal epithelial cells, with EG.5.1.3 exhibiting the highest fitness. Antivirals remained active. Neutralizing antibody (NAb) responses from vaccinees and BA.1/BA.2-infected individuals were markedly lower compared to BA.1, without major differences between variants. An XBB breakthrough infection enhanced NAb responses against both XBB and BA.2.86 variants. JN.1 displayed lower affinity to ACE2 and higher immune evasion properties compared to BA.2.86.1. Thus, while distinct, the evolutionary trajectory of these variants combines increased fitness and antibody evasion.

microbiology↗

High fusion and cytopathy of SARS-CoV-2 variant B.1.640.1

SARS-CoV-2 variants with undetermined properties have emerged intermittently throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Some variants possess unique phenotypes and mutations which allow further characterization of viral evolution and spike functions. Around 1100 cases of the B.1.640.1 variant were reported in Africa and Europe between 2021 and 2022, before the expansion of Omicron. Here, we analyzed the biological properties of a B.1.640.1 isolate and its spike. Compared to the ancestral spike, B.1.640.1 carried 14 amino acid substitutions and deletions. B.1.640.1 escaped binding by some anti-NTD and -RBD monoclonal antibodies, and neutralization by sera from convalescent and vaccinated individuals. In cell lines, infection generated large syncytia and a high cytopathic effect. In primary airway cells, B.1.640.1 replicated less than Omicron BA.1 and triggered more syncytia and cell death than other variants. The B.1.640.1 spike was highly fusogenic when expressed alone. This was mediated by two poorly characterized and infrequent mutations located in the spike S2 domain, T859N and D936H. Altogether, our results highlight the cytopathy of a hyper-fusogenic SARS-CoV-2 variant, supplanted upon the emergence of Omicron BA.1. ImportanceOur results highlight the plasticity of SARS-CoV-2 spike to generate highly fusogenic and cytopathic strains with the causative mutations being uncharacterized in previous variants. We describe mechanisms regulating the formation of syncytia and the subsequent consequences in cell lines and a primary culture model, which are poorly understood.

microbiology↗

Resistance of Omicron subvariants BA.2.75.2, BA.4.6 and BQ.1.1 to neutralizing antibodies

Convergent evolution of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2, BA.4 and BA.5 lineages has led to the emergence of several new subvariants, including BA.2.75.2, BA.4.6. and BQ.1.1. The subvariants BA.2.75.2 and BQ.1.1 are expected to become predominant in many countries in November 2022. They carry an additional and often redundant set of mutations in the spike, likely responsible for increased transmissibility and immune evasion. Here, we established a viral amplification procedure to easily isolate Omicron strains. We examined their sensitivity to 6 therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and to 72 sera from Pfizer BNT162b2-vaccinated individuals, with or without BA.1/BA.2 or BA.5 breakthrough infection. Ronapreve (Casirivimab and Imdevimab) and Evusheld (Cilgavimab and Tixagevimab) lost any antiviral efficacy against BA.2.75.2 and BQ.1.1, whereas Xevudy (Sotrovimab) remained weakly active. BQ.1.1 was also resistant to Bebtelovimab. Neutralizing titers in triply vaccinated individuals were low to undetectable against BQ.1.1 and BA.2.75.2, 4 months after boosting. A BA.1/BA.2 breakthrough infection increased these titers, which remained about 18-fold lower against BA.2.75.2 and BQ.1.1, than against BA.1. Reciprocally, a BA.5 breakthrough infection increased more efficiently neutralization against BA.5 and BQ.1.1 than against BA.2.75.2. Thus, the evolution trajectory of novel Omicron subvariants facilitated their spread in immunized populations and raises concerns about the efficacy of most currently available mAbs.

microbiology↗

The spike-stabilizing D614G mutation interacts with S1/S2 cleavage site mutations to promote the infectious potential of SARS-CoV-2 variants

SARS-CoV-2 remained genetically stable during the first three months of the pandemic, before acquiring a D614G spike mutation that rapidly spread worldwide, and then generating successive waves of viral variants with increasingly high transmissibility. We set out to evaluate possible epistatic interactions between the early occurring D614G mutation and the more recently emerged cleavage site mutations present in spike of the Alpha, Delta, and Omicron variants of concern. The P681H/R mutations at the S1/S2 cleavage site increased spike processing and fusogenicity but limited its incorporation into pseudoviruses. In addition, the higher cleavage rate led to higher shedding of the spike S1 subunit, resulting in a lower infectivity of the P681H/R-carrying pseudoviruses compared to those expressing the Wuhan wild-type spike. The D614G mutation increased spike expression at the cell surface and limited S1 shedding from pseudovirions. As a consequence, the D614G mutation preferentially increased the infectivity of P681H/R-carrying pseudoviruses. This enhancement was more marked in cells where the endosomal route predominated, suggesting that more stable spikes could better withstand the endosomal environment. Taken together, these findings suggest that the D614G mutation stabilized S1/S2 association and enabled the selection of mutations that increased S1/S2 cleavage, leading to the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants expressing highly fusogenic spikes. AUTHOR SUMMARYThe successive emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants is fueling the COVID pandemic, thus causing a major and persistent public health issue. The parameters involved in the emergence of variants with higher pathogenic potential remain incompletely understood. The first SARS-CoV-2 variant that spread worldwide in early 2020 carried a D614G mutation in the viral spike, making this protein more stable in its cleaved form at the surface of virions, and resulting in viral particles with higher infectious capacity. The Alpha and the Delta variants that spread in late 2020 and early 2021, respectively, proved increasingly transmissible and pathogenic when compared to the original SARS-CoV-2 strain. Interestingly, Alpha and Delta both carried mutations in a spike cleavage site that needs to be processed by cellular proteases prior to viral entry. The cleavage site mutations P681H/R made the Alpha and Delta spikes more efficient at viral fusion, by generating a higher fraction of cleaved spikes subunits S1 and S2. We show here that the early D614G mutation and the late P681H/R mutations act synergistically to increase the fusion capacity of SARS-CoV-2 variants. Specifically, viruses with increased spike cleavage due to P681H/R were even more dependent on the stabilizing effect of D614G mutation, which limited the shedding of cleaved S1 subunits from viral particles. These findings suggest that the worldwide spread of the D614G mutation was a prerequisite to the emergence of more pathogenic SARS-CoV-2 variants with highly fusogenic spikes.

microbiology↗

Potent Human Broadly SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing IgA and IgG Antibodies Effective Against Omicron BA.1 and BA.2

Memory B-cell and antibody responses to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein contribute to long-term immune protection against severe COVID-19, which can also be prevented by antibody-based interventions. Here, wide SARS-CoV-2 immunoprofiling in COVID-19 convalescents combining serological, cellular and monoclonal antibody explorations, revealed humoral immunity coordination. Detailed characterization of a hundred SARS-CoV-2 spike memory B-cell monoclonal antibodies uncovered diversity in their repertoire and antiviral functions. The latter were influenced by the targeted spike region with strong Fc-dependent effectors to the S2 subunit and potent neutralizers to the receptor binding domain. Amongst those, Cv2.1169 and Cv2.3194 antibodies cross-neutralized SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern including Omicron BA.1 and BA.2. Cv2.1169, isolated from a mucosa-derived IgA memory B cell, demonstrated potency boost as IgA dimers and therapeutic efficacy as IgG antibodies in animal models. Structural data provided mechanistic clues to Cv2.1169 potency and breadth. Thus, potent broadly neutralizing IgA antibodies elicited in mucosal tissues can stem SARS-CoV-2 infection, and Cv2.1169 and Cv2.3194 are prime candidates for COVID-19 prevention and treatment.

immunology↗

Fusogenicity and neutralization sensitivity of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta sublineage AY.4.2

SARS-CoV-2 lineages are continuously evolving. As of December 2021, the AY.4.2 Delta sub-lineage represented 20 % of sequenced strains in UK and has been detected in dozens of countries. It has since then been supplanted by the Omicron variant. AY.4.2 displays three additional mutations (T95I, Y145H and A222V) in the N-terminal domain (NTD) of the spike when compared to the original Delta variant (B.1.617.2) and remains poorly characterized. Here, we analyzed the fusogenicity of the AY.4.2 spike and the sensitivity of an authentic AY.4.2 isolate to neutralizing antibodies. The AY.4.2 spike exhibited similar fusogenicity and binding to ACE2 than Delta. The sensitivity of infectious AY.4.2 to a panel of monoclonal neutralizing antibodies was similar to Delta, except for the anti-RBD Imdevimab, which showed incomplete neutralization. Sensitivity of AY.4.2 to sera from individuals having received two or three doses of Pfizer or two doses of AstraZeneca vaccines was reduced by 1.7 to 2.1 fold, when compared to Delta. Our results suggest that mutations in the NTD remotely impair the efficacy of anti-RBD antibodies. The temporary spread of AY.4.2 was not associated with major changes in spike function but rather to a partially reduced neutralization sensitivity.

microbiology↗

Considerable escape of SARS-CoV-2 variant Omicron to antibody neutralization

The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant was first identified in November 2021 in Botswana and South Africa1,2. It has in the meantime spread to many countries and is expected to rapidly become dominant worldwide. The lineage is characterized by the presence of about 32 mutations in the Spike, located mostly in the N-terminal domain (NTD) and the receptor binding domain (RBD), which may enhance viral fitness and allow antibody evasion. Here, we isolated an infectious Omicron virus in Belgium, from a traveller returning from Egypt. We examined its sensitivity to 9 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) clinically approved or in development3, and to antibodies present in 90 sera from COVID-19 vaccine recipients or convalescent individuals. Omicron was totally or partially resistant to neutralization by all mAbs tested. Sera from Pfizer or AstraZeneca vaccine recipients, sampled 5 months after complete vaccination, barely inhibited Omicron. Sera from COVID-19 convalescent patients collected 6 or 12 months post symptoms displayed low or no neutralizing activity against Omicron. Administration of a booster Pfizer dose as well as vaccination of previously infected individuals generated an anti-Omicron neutralizing response, with titers 5 to 31 fold lower against Omicron than against Delta. Thus, Omicron escapes most therapeutic monoclonal antibodies and to a large extent vaccine-elicited antibodies.

immunology↗

Reduced sensitivity of infectious SARS-CoV-2 variant B.1.617.2 to monoclonal antibodies and sera from convalescent and vaccinated individuals

The SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617 lineage emerged in October 2020 in India1-6. It has since then become dominant in some indian regions and further spread to many countries. The lineage includes three main subtypes (B1.617.1, B.1617.2 and B.1.617.3), which harbour diverse Spike mutations in the N-terminal domain (NTD) and the receptor binding domain (RBD) which may increase their immune evasion potential. B.1.617.2 is believed to spread faster than the other versions. Here, we isolated infectious B.1.617.2 from a traveller returning from India. We examined its sensitivity to monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and to antibodies present in sera from COVID-19 convalescent individuals or vaccine recipients, in comparison to other viral lineages. B.1.617.2 was resistant to neutralization by some anti-NTD and anti-RBD mAbs, including Bamlanivimab, which were impaired in binding to the B.1.617.2 Spike. Sera from convalescent patients collected up to 12 months post symptoms and from Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine recipients were 3 to 6 fold less potent against B.1.617.2, relative to B.1.1.7. Sera from individuals having received one dose of AstraZeneca Vaxzevria barely inhibited B.1.617.2. Thus, B.1.617.2 spread is associated with an escape to antibodies targeting non-RBD and RBD Spike epitopes.

microbiology↗

Sensitivity of infectious SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 variants to neutralizing antibodies

SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 variants emerged respectively in United Kingdom and South Africa and spread in many countries. Here, we isolated infectious B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 strains and examined their sensitivity to anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies present in sera and nasal swabs, in comparison with a D614G reference virus. We established a novel rapid neutralization assay, based on reporter cells that become GFP+ after overnight infection. B.1.1.7 was neutralized by 79/83 sera from convalescent patients collected up to 9 months post symptoms, almost similar to D614G. There was a mean 6-fold reduction in titers and even loss of activity against B.1.351 in 40% of convalescent sera after 9 months. Early sera from 19 vaccinated individuals were almost as potent against B.1.1.7 but less efficacious against B.1.351, when compared to D614G. Nasal swabs from vaccine recipients were not neutralizing, except in individuals who were diagnosed COVID-19+ before vaccination. Thus, faster-spreading variants acquired a partial resistance to humoral immunity generated by natural infection or vaccination, mostly visible in individuals with low antibody levels.

immunology↗

Differential screening identifies molecules specifically inhibiting CCR5 transport to the cell surface and HIV infection

Proteins destined to the cell surface are conveyed through membrane-bound compartments using the secretory pathway. Multiple secretory routes exist in cells, which paves the way to the development of inhibitory molecules able to specifically perturb the transport of a chosen cargo. We used differential high-content screening of chemical libraries to identify molecules reducing the secretion of CCR5, the major co-receptor for HIV-1 entry. Three molecules strongly affected the anterograde transport of CCR5, without inhibiting the transport of the related G protein-coupled receptors CCR1 and CXCR4. These three molecules perturb the transport of endogenous CCR5 and decrease the entry of HIV in human primary target cells. Two molecules were found to share the same mode of action, inhibiting palmitoylation of CCR5. Our results demonstrate that secretory routes can be specifically targeted which allows to envisage novel strategies to provoke the intracellular retention or rerouting of secretory proteins involved in disease development.

cell biology↗