bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Stark, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Stark, A..

16 recordsLinked to original sources

BARe-seq enables high-throughput dissection of cis-regulatory control of transcriptional bursting

Transcriptional bursts determine RNA output through two kinetic parameters: burst size and burst frequency. How cis-regulatory DNA encodes these kinetic parameters remains unclear, in part because existing approaches do not combine scalable sequence perturbation with allele-resolved burst inference. Here, we developed Bulk Allele Resolution Sequencing (BARe-seq), an allele-resolved massively parallel reporter assay that enables inference of transcriptional burst parameters from bulk sequencing. Applying BARe-seq to libraries of 1000 promoters and 1000 enhancers in Drosophila S2 cells revealed distinct kinetic properties of promoters and enhancers. Promoter-dependent mean expression was driven by both burst size and burst frequency: TATA-box promoters showed larger bursts, whereas DPE promoters showed higher burst frequency. In contrast, enhancer strength was primarily driven by burst frequency, although specific transcription factor motifs were also associated with burst size. Thus, BARe-seq dissects cis-regulatory control of transcriptional bursting and extends allele-resolved measurements to pooled reporter assays in bulk sequencing experiments.

molecular biology↗

Activator-promoter compatibility in mammals: a CpG-Island-specific co-activator directly bridges transcription factors to TFIID

Transcription from CpG island (CGI) promoters controls the expression of two-thirds of mammalian genes, yet despite their prevalence, it remains unknown whether CGI-specific co-activators with intrinsic specificity (i.e. compatibility) for these promoters exist or by what mechanisms they might function. Here, we perform proteome-wide functional screens to identify more than fifty transcriptional activators that are intrinsically specific to CGI promoters, establishing that promoter-class-specific activators are a widespread feature of mammalian gene regulation. Among these, we identify Host Cell Factor 1 (Hcfc1) as the founding member of CGI-specific co-activators. Hcfc1 is essential for the expression of thousands of CGI-promoter-driven genes and acquires CGI-specificity through a two-step mechanism: CGI-associated transcription factors recruit Hcfc1 through its Kelch domain, and Hcfc1 in turn directly engages the general transcription factor TFIID through a dedicated activation domain. The Hcfc1-TFIID interaction overcomes a key rate-limiting step for CGI promoter initiation, TFIID recruitment, thereby directly enabling transcription. Hcfc1 thus functions as a promoter-class-specific bridge between CGI-bound transcription factors and the general transcription machinery, analogous to Mediator but with intrinsic promoter specificity. Together, we uncover a dedicated activation pathway for CGI promoters, reveal a fundamental mechanistic difference in transcription activation between promoter classes in mammals, and establish co-activator-promoter compatibility as a core principle in mammalian gene regulation.

molecular biology↗

A foundational model for joint sequence-function multi-species modeling at scale for long-range genomic prediction

Genomic prediction and design require models that integrate local sequence features with long-range regulatory dependencies spanning hundreds of kilobases to megabases. Existing approaches have made substantial progress along complementary axes: supervised sequence-to-function models achieve high accuracy for specific assays and organisms, self-supervised genomic foundation models learn transferable representations from large-scale sequence data, and conditional generative models enable principled sequence design guided by functional objectives. However, these strengths are typically realized in isolation--across distinct model classes, architectures, and training regimes--limiting the ability to combine long-context, base-resolution prediction, functional modeling, and controllable generation within a single efficient framework that generalizes across organisms and modalities. Here we introduce Nucleotide Transformer v3 (NTv3), a multi-species foundation model that unifies representation learning, functional-track and genome-annotation prediction, and controllable sequence generation within a common backbone. NTv3 uses a U-Net-like architecture to enable single-base tokenization and efficient modeling of contexts up to 1 Mb. We pre-train NTv3 on 9 trillion base pairs from OpenGenome2 using base-resolution masked language modeling, followed by post-training with a joint objective that integrates continued self-supervision with supervised learning on [~]16,000 functional tracks and annotation labels from 24 animal and plant species. After post-training, NTv3 achieves state-of-the-art accuracy for functional-track prediction and genome annotation across species, outperforming leading sequence-to-function and foundation-model baselines on established benchmarks and on the new NO_SCPLOWTVC_SCPLOW 3 BO_SCPLOWENCHMARKC_SCPLOW, a controlled downstream fine-tuning suite in a standardized 32 kb input / base-resolution output setting. We further show that NTv3 consolidates a shared regulatory grammar across tasks, enabling coherent long-range genome-to-function inference and variant-associated remodeling. Finally, we fine-tune NTv3 into a controllable generative model via masked diffusion language modeling and use it to design enhancer sequences with specified activity levels and promoter selectivity. We validate these designs experimentally, showing that generated enhancers recapitulate the intended activity stratification and achieve the desired promoter-specific activation in cellulo. We release the NTv3 model family together with code and practical cookbooks for long-context training, multispecies post-training, fine-tuning, interpretation, and sequence design.

genomics↗

Predictive design of tissue-specific mammalian enhancers that function in vivo in the mouse embryo

Enhancers control tissue-specific gene expression across metazoans. Although deep learning has enabled enhancer prediction and design in mammalian cell lines and invertebrate systems, it remains unclear whether such approaches can operate within the regulatory complexity of mammalian tissues in vivo. Here, we present a general strategy for designing tissue-specific enhancers that function reliably in mice. We use deep learning to train compact convolutional neural networks (CNNs) on genome-wide chromatin accessibility and fine-tune them via transfer learning on validated human and mouse enhancers. Guided by these models, we design fifteen synthetic enhancers for the heart, limb, and central nervous system (CNS) in mouse embryos, all of which are active in their intended target tissue. Our work establishes a generalizable framework for programmable control of mammalian gene expression in vivo, opening new avenues in functional genomics, synthetic biology, and gene therapy.

synthetic biology↗

Systematic Discovery of Pathogen Effector Functions across Human Pathogens and Pathways

Pathogens deploy effector proteins to exploit host cell biology, and most pathogen open reading frames (ORFs) are rapidly evolving and lack functional annotation. We developed the eORFeome, a scalable functional genomics platform encompassing 3,835 effector ORFs from diverse viruses, bacteria, and parasites. High-throughput barcoded screens across NF{kappa}B, apoptosis, p53, cGAS-STING and MHC-I pathways revealed functions for hundreds of uncharacterized eORFs, unexpected new activities for known effectors, and distinct pathway-specific functions encoded by single ORFs. Illustrating the power of the approach, we identify HHV6A U14 as a p53 antagonist, HHV7 U21 as a dual-function STING antagonist and MHC-I antigen display inhibitor, and adenoviral 13.6K/i-leader protein as a de novo evolved TAP inhibitor that suppresses MHC-I display. These results establish a general framework for systematic effector annotation, uncover new mechanisms of host-pathogen interaction across kingdoms, and highlight pathogen effectors as a versatile toolkit for rewiring and probing human cellular pathways.

systems biology↗

Programmatic design and editing of cis-regulatory elements

The development of modern genome editing and DNA synthesis has enabled researchers to edit DNA sequences with high precision but has left unsolved the problem of designing these edits. We introduce Ledidi, a computational method that rephrases the discrete design task of choosing which edits to make as an easily solvable continuous optimization problem. Ledidi can use any pre-trained deep learning model to guide the optimization, yielding an edited sequence that exhibits the desired outcome while explicitly minimizing the number of edits used. When applied in dozens of settings, we find that Ledidis designs can precisely control transcription factor binding, chromatin accessibility, transcription, and enhancer activity in silico. By using several deep learning models simultaneously, we design cell type-specific enhancers and experimentally validate them in cellulo. Finally, we introduce the concept of an "affinity catalog", where the design task is repeated multiple times across continuous variants of the design target. We demonstrate how these catalogs can be used to interpret deep learning models and the impact of starting template sequences, and also to design regulatory elements that control transcriptional dosage while maintaining cell type-specificity.

bioinformatics↗

Proteome-scale tagging and functional screening in mammalian cells by ORFtag

Determining protein function in a systematic manner is a key goal of modern biology, but remains challenging with current approaches. Here, we present ORFtag, a versatile, cost-effective and highly efficient method for the massively-parallel tagging and functional interrogation of proteins at proteome scale. Using mouse embryonic stem cells, we showcase ORFtags utility through screens for transcriptional activators, repressors and post-transcriptional regulators. Each screen finds known and novel regulators, including long ORFs not accessible to other methods, revealing that Zfp574 is a highly selective transcriptional activator and that oncogenic fusions frequently function as transactivators.

systems biology↗

Enhancer cooperativity can compensate for loss of activity over large genomic distances

Enhancers are short DNA sequences that activate their target promoter from a distance; however, increasing the genomic distance between the enhancer and the promoter decreases expression levels. Many genes are controlled by combinations of multiple enhancers, yet the interaction and cooperation of individual enhancer elements is not well understood. Here, we developed a novel synthetic platform that allows building complex regulatory landscapes from the bottom up. We tested the system by integrating individual enhancers at different distances and revealed that the strength of an enhancer determines how strongly it is affected by increased genomic distance. Furthermore, synergy between two enhancer elements depends on the distance at which the two elements are integrated: introducing a weak enhancer between a strong enhancer and the promoter strongly increases reporter gene expression, allowing enhancers to activate from increased genomic distances.

molecular biology↗

Developmental and housekeeping transcriptional programs display distinct modes of enhancer-enhancer cooperativity in Drosophila

Genomic enhancers are key transcriptional regulators which, upon the binding of sequence-specific transcription factors, activate their cognate target promoters. Although enhancers have been extensively studied in isolation, a substantial number of genes have more than one simultaneously active enhancer, and it remains unclear how these cooperate to regulate transcription. Using Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells as a model, we assay the activities of more than a thousand individual enhancers and a million enhancer pairs towards housekeeping and developmental core promoters with STARR-seq. We report that housekeeping and developmental enhancers show distinct modes of enhancer-enhancer cooperativity: while housekeeping enhancers are additive such that their combined activity mirrors the sum of their individual activities, developmental enhancers are synergistic and follow a multiplicative model of cooperativity. This developmental enhancer synergy is promiscuous and neither depends on the enhancers endogenous genomic contexts nor on specific transcription factor motif signatures, but it saturates for the highest levels of enhancer activity. These results have important implications for our understanding of gene-regulation in complex multi-enhancer loci and genomically clustered housekeeping genes, providing a rationale for strong and mild transcriptional effects of mutations within enhancer regions.

genomics↗

Widespread regulatory specificities between transcriptional corepressors and enhancers in Drosophila

Animal development and homeostasis critically depend on the accurate regulation of gene transcription, which includes the silencing of genes that should not be expressed. Repression is mediated by a specific class of transcription factors (TFs) termed repressors that, via the recruitment of co-repressors (CoRs), can dominantly prevent transcription, even in the presence of activating cues. However, the relationship between specific CoRs and enhancers has remained unclear. Here, we used functional genomics to uncover regulatory specificities between CoRs and enhancers. We show that enhancers can typically be repressed by only a subset of CoRs. Enhancers classified by CoR sensitivity also show distinct biological functions and endogenous chromatin features. Moreover, enhancers that are sensitive or resistant to silencing by specific CoRs differ in TF motif content, and their sensitivity to CoRs can be predicted based on TF motif content. Finally, we identified and validated specific TF motifs that have a direct impact on enhancers sensitivity or resistance towards specific CoRs, using large scale motif mutagenesis and addition experiments. This study reveals the existence of TF motif-based regulatory rules that coordinate CoRs-enhancer compatibilities. These specificities between repressors and activators not only suggest that repression occurs via distinct mechanisms, but also provide an additional layer in transcriptional regulation that allows for differential repression at close genomic distances and offers multiple ways for de-repression.

molecular biology↗

Functionally distinct promoter classes initiate transcription via different mechanisms reflected in focused versus dispersed initiation patterns

Recruitment of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) to promoter regions is essential for transcription. Despite conflicting evidence, the Pol II Pre-Initiation Complex (PIC) is often thought to be of uniform composition and assemble at all promoters via an identical mechanism. Here, we show using Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells as a model that promoter classes with distinct functions and initiation patterns function via PICs that display different compositions and dependencies: developmental promoter DNA readily associates with the canonical Pol II PIC, whereas housekeeping promoter DNA does not and instead recruit different factors such as DREF. Consistently, TBP and DREF are required by distinct sets of promoters, and TBP and its paralog TRF2 function at different promoter types, partly exclusively and partly redundantly. In contrast, TFIIA is required for transcription from all promoters, and we identify factors that can recruit and/or stabilize TFIIA at housekeeping promoters and activate transcription. We show that promoter activation by these factors is sufficient to induce the dispersed transcription initiation patterns characteristic of housekeeping promoters. Thus, different promoter classes direct distinct mechanisms of transcription initiation, which relate to different focused versus dispersed initiation patterns.

molecular biology↗

Enhancers display constrained sequence flexibility and context-specific modulation of motif function

The information about when and where each gene is to be expressed is mainly encoded in the DNA sequence of enhancers, sequence elements that comprise binding sites (motifs) for different transcription factors (TFs). Most of the research on enhancer sequences has been focused on TF motif presence, while the enhancer syntax, i.e. the flexibility of important motif positions and how the sequence context modulates the activity of TF motifs, remain poorly understood. Here, we explore the rules of enhancer syntax by a two-pronged approach in Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells: we (1) replace important motifs by an exhaustive set of all possible 65,536 eight-nucleotide-long random sequences and (2) paste eight important TF motif types into 763 positions within 496 enhancers. These complementary strategies reveal that enhancers display constrained sequence flexibility and the context-specific modulation of motif function. Important motifs can be functionally replaced by hundreds of sequences constituting several distinct motif types, but only a fraction of all possible sequences and motif types restore enhancer activity. Moreover, TF motifs contribute with different intrinsic strengths that are strongly modulated by the enhancer sequence context (the flanking sequence, presence and diversity of other motif types, and distance between motifs), such that not all motif types can work in all positions. The context-specific modulation of motif function is also a hallmark of human enhancers and TF motifs, as we demonstrate experimentally. Overall, these two general principles of enhancer sequences are important to understand and predict enhancer function during development, evolution and in disease.

genomics↗

Identification and characterization of repressive domains in Drosophila transcription factors

All multicellular life relies on differential gene expression, determined by regulatory DNA elements and DNA-binding transcription factors that mediate activation and repression via cofactor recruitment. While activators have been extensively characterized, repressors are less well studied and their repressive domains (RDs) are typically unknown, as are the RDs properties and the co-repressors (CoRs) they recruit. Here, we develop the high-throughput next-generation-sequencing-based method Repressive-Domain (RD)-seq to systematically identify RDs in complex libraries. Screening more than 200,000 fragments covering the coding sequences of all transcription-related proteins in Drosophila melanogaster, we identify 195 RDs in known repressors and in proteins not previously associated with repression. Many RDs contain recurrent short peptide motifs that are required for RD function, as demonstrated by motif mutagenesis, and are conserved between fly and human. Moreover, we show that RDs which contain one of five distinct repressive motifs interact with and depend on different CoRs, including Groucho, CtBP, Sin3A or Smrter. Overall, our work constitutes an invaluable resource and advances our understanding of repressors, their sequences, and the functional impact of sequence-altering mutations.

molecular biology↗

DeepSTARR predicts enhancer activity from DNA sequence and enables the de novo design of enhancers

Enhancer sequences control gene expression and comprise binding sites (motifs) for different transcription factors (TFs). Despite extensive genetic and computational studies, the relationship between DNA sequence and regulatory activity is poorly understood and enhancer de novo design is considered impossible. Here we built a deep learning model, DeepSTARR, to quantitatively predict the activities of thousands of developmental and housekeeping enhancers directly from DNA sequence in Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells. The model learned relevant TF motifs and higher-order syntax rules, including functionally non-equivalent instances of the same TF motif that are determined by motif-flanking sequence and inter-motif distances. We validated these rules experimentally and demonstrated their conservation in human by testing more than 40,000 wildtype and mutant Drosophila and human enhancers. Finally, we designed and functionally validated synthetic enhancers with desired activities de novo.

genomics↗

PHF3 regulates neuronal gene expression through the new Pol II CTD reader domain SPOC

The C-terminal domain (CTD) of the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) is a regulatory hub for transcription and RNA processing. Here, we identify PHD-finger protein 3 (PHF3) as a new CTD-binding factor that negatively regulates transcription and mRNA stability. The PHF3 SPOC domain preferentially binds to CTD repeats phosphorylated on Serine-2 and PHF3 tracks with Pol II across the length of genes. PHF3 competes with TFIIS for Pol II binding through its TFIIS-like domain (TLD), thus inhibiting TFIIS-mediated rescue of backtracked Pol II. PHF3 knock-out or PHF3 SPOC deletion in human cells result in gene upregulation and a global increase in mRNA stability, with marked derepression of neuronal genes. Key neuronal genes are aberrantly expressed in Phf3 knock-out mouse embryonic stem cells, resulting in impaired neuronal differentiation. Our data suggest that PHF3 is a prominent effector of neuronal gene regulation at the interface of transcription elongation and mRNA decay.

biochemistry↗

Resolving systematic errors in widely-used enhancer activity assays in human cells enables genome-wide functional enhancer characterization

The identification of transcriptional enhancers in the human genome is a prime goal in biology. Enhancers are typically predicted via chromatin marks, yet their function is primarily assessed with plasmid-based reporter assays. Here, we show that two previous observations relating to plasmid-transfection into human cells render such assays unreliable: (1) the function of the bacterial plasmid origin-of-replication (ORI) as a conflicting core-promoter and (2) the activation of a type I interferon (IFN-I) response. These problems cause strongly confounding false-positives and -negatives in luciferase assays and genome-wide STARR-seq screens. We overcome both problems by directly employing the ORI as a core-promoter and by inhibiting two kinases central to IFN-I induction. This corrects luciferase assays and enables genome-wide STARR-seq screens in human cells. Comprehensive enhancer activity profiles in HeLa-S3 cells uncover strong enhancers, IFN-I-induced enhancers, and enhancers endogenously silenced at the chromatin level. Our findings apply to all episomal enhancer activity assays in mammalian cells, and are key to the characterization of human enhancers.

genomics↗