St. George, K. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2022

Delta-Omicron recombinant SARS-CoV-2 in a transplant patient treated with Sotrovimab

BackgroundThe emergence of recombinant viruses is a threat to public health. Recombination of viral variants may combine variant-specific features that together catalyze viral escape from treatment or immunity. The selective advantages of recombinant SARS-CoV-2 isolates over their parental lineages remain unknown. MethodsMulti-method amplicon and metagenomic sequencing of a clinical swab and the in vitro grown virus allowed for high-confidence detection of a novel recombinant variant. Mutational, phylogeographic, and structural analyses determined features of the recombinant genome and spike protein. Neutralization assays using infectious as well as pseudotyped viruses and point mutants thereof defined the recombinants sensitivity to a panel of monoclonal antibodies and sera from vaccinated and/or convalescent individuals. ResultsA novel Delta-Omicron SARS-CoV-2 recombinant was identified in an unvaccinated, immunosuppressed kidney transplant recipient treated with monoclonal antibody Sotrovimab. The recombination breakpoint is located in the spike N-terminal domain, adjacent to the Sotrovimab quaternary binding site, and results in a 5-Delta AY.45 and a 3-Omicron BA.1 mosaic spike protein. Delta and BA.1 are sensitive to Sotrovimab neutralization, whereas the Delta-Omicron recombinant is highly resistant to Sotrovimab, both with and without the RBD resistance mutation E340D. ConclusionsRecombination between circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants can functionally contribute to immune escape. It is critical to validate phenotypes of mosaic viruses and monitor immunosuppressed COVID-19 patients treated with monoclonal antibodies for the selection of recombinant and immune escape variants. (Funded by NYU, the National Institutes of Health, and others)

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2020

Assessment of sample pooling for clinical SARS-CoV-2 testing

Accommodating large increases in sample workloads has presented one of the biggest challenges to clinical laboratories during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite the implementation of new automated detection systems, and previous efficiencies such as barcoding, electronic data transfer and extensive robotics, throughput capacities have struggled to meet the demand. Sample pooling has been suggested as an additional strategy to further address this need. The greatest concern with this approach in a clinical setting is the potential for reduced sensitivity, particularly the risk of false negative results when weak positive samples are pooled. To investigate this possibility, detection rates in pooled samples were evaluated, with extensive assessment of pools containing weak positive specimens. Additionally, the frequency of occurrence of weak positive samples across ten weeks of the pandemic were reviewed. Weak positive specimens were detected in all five-sample pools but failed to be detected in four of the 24 nine-sample pools tested. Weak positive samples comprised an average 16.5% of the positive specimens tested during the pandemic thus far, slightly increasing in frequency during later weeks. Other aspects of the testing process should be considered, however, such as accessioning and reporting, which are not streamlined and may be complicated by pooling procedures. Therefore, the impact on the entire laboratory process needs to be carefully assessed prior to implementing such a strategy.

microbiology↗