bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Sreekar, R.

Publications and source records attributed to Sreekar, R..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Insectivorous birds and bats outperform ants in the top-down regulation of arthropods across strata of a Japanese temperate forest

O_LIBirds, bats, and ants are recognized as significant arthropod predators. However, empirical studies reveal inconsistent trends in their relative roles in top-down control across strata. Here, we describe the differences between forest strata in the separate effects of birds, bats, and ants on arthropod communities and their cascading effects on plant damage. C_LIO_LIWe implemented a factorial design to exclude vertebrates and ants in both the canopy and understory. Additionally, we separately excluded birds and bats from the understory using diurnal and nocturnal exclosures. At the end of the experiments, we collected all arthropods and assessed herbivory damage. C_LIO_LIArthropods responded similarly to predator exclusion across forest strata, with a density increase of 81% on trees without vertebrates and 53% without both vertebrates and ants. Additionally, bird exclusion alone led to an 89% increase in arthropod density, while bat exclusion resulted in a 63% increase. Herbivory increased by 42% when vertebrates were excluded and by 35% when both vertebrates and ants were excluded. Bird exclusion alone increased herbivory damage by 28%, while the exclusion of bats showed a detectable but non-significant increase (by 22%). In contrast, ant exclusion had no significant effect on arthropod density or herbivory damage across strata. C_LIO_LIOur results reveal that the effects of birds and bats on arthropod density and herbivory damage are similar between the forest canopy and understory in this temperate forest. In addition, ants were not found to be significant predators in our system. Furthermore, birds, bats, and ants appeared to exhibit antagonistic relationships in influencing arthropod density. These findings highlight, unprecedentedly, the equal importance of birds and bats in maintaining ecological balance across different strata of a temperate forest. C_LI

ecology↗

The impact of ants and vertebrate predators on arthropods and plants: a meta-analysis

The trophic interactions between plants, insect herbivores and their predators are complex and prone to trophic cascades. Theory predicts that predators increase plant biomass by feeding on herbivores. However, it remains unclear whether different types of predators regulate herbivores to the same degree, and how intraguild predation impacts these trophic interactions. Specifically, we lack a more comprehensive look at the effects of various groups of predators on a global scale. Here we report a meta-analysis of 486 experiments gathered from 157 publications reporting the effect of insectivorous vertebrates (birds and bats) and ants on abundances of predatory (spiders, ants, others) and herbivorous (chewers and others) arthropods; on arthropod richness and plant damage. Generally, the absence of vertebrate predators led to the increase of predatory arthropods by 18%, herbivorous arthropods by 75%, and plant damage by 47%. In contrast, after the removal of ants, the increase in the abundances of other predatory arthropods did not compensate for missing ants, herbivore arthropods increased their abundances by 53%, and plant damage increased by 146%. The effects of ant exclosures were stronger in communities at lower elevations and latitudes, while we did not detect any clear geographical patterns in the effect of vertebrate exclosures. Neither precipitation nor NDVI had a significant impact on most of the measured effects, and the effect of exclosures was robust for both plant growth forms and different habitat types. We found vertebrate insectivores to be the more dominant predators of arthropods, but we detected that the strength of their trophic cascades was weakened by intraguild predation. On the other hand, we found that although ants were relatively less dominant as predators, and their influence was detectable only in the most productive sites, the effect of trophic cascades on plants they caused was stronger than that of vertebrate insectivores.

ecology↗