bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Squires, E.

Publications and source records attributed to Squires, E..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Sex differences in durability following heavy intensity cycling exercise in trained athletes

The ability to withstand impairments in key physiological variables during prolonged exercise, known as durability, is emerging as an important factor in cycling performance. While females possess physiological characteristics that could confer enhanced durability relative to males, little is known about potential sex differences. 32 trained cyclists (16 males and 16 females) performed an incremental exercise test to exhaustion in visit 1. In visit 2 they performed 90 minutes of heavy intensity cycling (HVY) at 110% of gas exchange threshold (GET), followed by another incremental test. During HVY, pulmonary gas exchange ([V]O2 and [V]CO2) ventilation ([V]E), heart rate (HR), rating of perceived exertion (RPE), near-infrared spectroscopy and electromyography were recorded, and blood lactate (BLa) was collected. Before and after HVY, maximal voluntary contraction (MVIC), voluntary activation (VA) and potentiated twitches (100Hz, 10Hz, Qtw{middle dot}pot) of the knee extensors were assessed. Power at GET (-16{+/-}15% vs -2{+/-}13%) and respiratory compensation point (-13{+/-}10% vs -6{+/-}9%) decreased more in males than females (P[&le;]0.049). All aspects of neuromuscular function decreased from pre to post (all P<0.001), without sex differences (P[&ge;]0.096). During HVY, HR, [V]O2 (%peak), relative energy expenditure increased more in males (P[&le;]0.008), whereas respiratory exchange ratio decreased more in females (P=0.001). BLa was higher in males than females (P=0.030). Muscle oxygen extraction was lower (P=0.004) and tissue saturation index higher for females (P<0.001). The smaller reductions exhibited by females in submaximal thresholds, associated with lesser derangements to oxidative efficiency, highlight the need to consider sex-specific training prescription and pacing strategies for long duration events. Key PointsO_LIDurability, as measured by the reduction in incremental exercise test outcomes, is relatively unexplored in females compared to males, despite physiological sex differences that might confer a female advantage. C_LIO_LIAfter 90 minutes of heavy intensity cycling, males demonstrated greater reductions in the power outputs associated with gas exchange threshold and respiratory compensation point. C_LIO_LIThe maximal rate of oxygen consumption and incremental test peak power output decreased similarly in both sexes. C_LIO_LIThese changes are associated with greater carbohydrate metabolism and losses of efficiency in males, whereas no sex differences were observed in neuromuscular fatigue. C_LI

physiology↗

Sex differences in the cardiopulmonary and neuromuscular response to high-intensity interval exercise

Sex differences exist in the integrative response to exercise, however, these are typically researched during constant-load exercise. Interval exercise involves high-intensity efforts interspersed with recovery periods to repeatedly stress physiological systems, and it is currently unknown whether the response to this form of exercise differs between sexes. Ten males and ten females (age: 25{+/-}3 years) completed two experimental visits. First, an incremental treadmill exercise test was performed to obtain submaximal (lactate threshold) and maximal ([Formula] O2peak) data. Thereafter, visit two involved 4 x 3-min running intervals at 90% of the final incremental test velocity (v[Formula] O2peak), with 90 secs rest between intervals. Before exercise and after each interval, maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), quadriceps potentiated twitch (Qtw.pot), and voluntary activation (VA) were recorded. The rates of oxygen uptake ([Formula] O2), carbon dioxide production ([Formula] CO2) and ventilation ([Formula] E) were continuously recorded throughout. There was no sex difference in relative [Formula] O2peak (males: 47.2{+/-}6.0 vs. females: 44.4{+/-}5.8 ml.kg- 1.min-1, p=0.292). When expressed relative to peak values, there were no sex differences in the [Formula] O2 or [Formula] CO2 response to the interval task (p[&ge;]0.781). Females had greater [Formula] E, [Formula] E/[Formula] O2, and [Formula] E/[Formula] CO2 values during the first two intervals (p[&le;]0.046). There were no sex differences in the reductions in MVC, Qtw.pot, and VA during the interval task (p[&ge;]0.150), however females had lesser reductions in Qtw.pot values post-exercise (-24{+/-}9 vs. -15{+/-}8%, p=0.044). Sex differences exist in the physiological response to interval exercise. Compared to males, females experienced greater hyperpnoea during the initial stages, and had lesser decreases in contractile function post-exercise.

physiology↗