Biology subjects

Splitt, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Splitt, M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2022

The PREGCARE study: Personalized recurrence risk assessment following the birth of a child with a pathogenic de novo mutation

Next-generation sequencing has led to a dramatic improvement in molecular diagnoses of serious pediatric disorders caused by apparently de novo mutations (DNMs); by contrast, clinicians ability to counsel the parents about the risk of recurrence in a future child has lagged behind. Owing to the possibility that one of the parents could be mosaic in their germline, a recurrence risk of 1-2% is frequently quoted, but for any specific couple, this figure is usually incorrect. We present a systematic approach to providing individualized recurrence risk stratification, by combining deep-sequencing of multiple tissues in the mother-father-child trio with haplotyping to determine the parental origin of the DNM. In the first 58 couples analysed (total of 59 DNMs in 49 different genes), the risk for 35 (59%) DNMs was decreased below 0.1% but for 6 (10%) couples it was increased owing to parental mosaicism - that could be quantified in semen (recurrence risks of 5.6-12.1%) for the paternal cases. Deep-sequencing of the DNM efficiently identifies couples at greatest risk for recurrence and may qualify them for additional reproductive technologies. Haplotyping can further reassure many other couples that their recurrence risk is very low, but its implementation is more technically challenging and will require better understanding of how couples respond to information that reduces their risks.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2017

Autosomal recessive coding variants explain only a small proportion of undiagnosed developmental disorders in the British Isles

Large exome-sequencing datasets offer an unprecedented opportunity to understand the genetic architecture of rare diseases, informing clinical genetics counseling and optimal study designs for disease gene identification. We analyzed 7,448 exome-sequenced families from the Deciphering Developmental Disorders study, and, for the first time, estimated the causal contribution of recessive coding variation exome-wide. We found that the proportion of cases attributable to recessive coding variants is surprisingly low in patients of European ancestry, at only 3.6%, versus 50% of cases explained by de novo coding mutations. Surprisingly, we found that, even in European probands with affected siblings, recessive coding variants are only likely to explain ~12% of cases. In contrast, they account for 31% of probands with Pakistani ancestry due to elevated autozygosity. We tested every gene for an excess of damaging homozygous or compound heterozygous genotypes and found three genes that passed stringent Bonferroni correction: EIF3F, KDM5B, and THOC6. EIF3F is a novel disease gene, and KDM5B has previously been reported as a dominant disease gene. KDM5B appears to follow a complex mode of inheritance, in which heterozygous loss-of-function variants (LoFs) show incomplete penetrance and biallelic LoFs are fully penetrant. Our results suggest that a large proportion of undiagnosed developmental disorders remain to be explained by other factors, such as noncoding variants and polygenic risk.

genetics↗