bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Souza, A. S. O.

Publications and source records attributed to Souza, A. S. O..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

CDK4/6 inhibitors enhance oxaliplatin efficacy in colorectal cancer with RB-dependent and tumor-selective activity in intestinal model

Although the retinoblastoma protein (pRB) is functionally inactivated by hyperphosphorylation in the majority of colorectal cancers (CRC) - with RB1 rarely mutated and even amplified at the genomic level - three critical gaps remain unaddressed: no study has systematically compared which first-line chemotherapeutic agent best synergizes with CDK4/6 inhibition using head-to-head quantitative analysis; functional differences between palbociclib and abemaciclib in chemotherapy combinations have not been characterized in CRC; and direct genetic evidence of RB dependency in this combinatorial context is lacking. Here, we addressed these gaps by evaluating palbociclib and abemaciclib combined with oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and SN-38 in HCT116 CRC cells, with validation in SW480 cells, RB1-silenced HCT116 cells (shRNA-RB), and non-tumoral intestinal epithelial cells (IEC-6), using quantitative drug interaction analysis (Chou-Talalay), cell cycle profiling, apoptosis assessment, and pRB phosphorylation measurement. Oxaliplatin was the most consistently synergistic partner for both CDK4/6 inhibitors (CI < 1 across all tested concentrations), while combinations with SN-38 yielded variable results and 5-FU combinations approached additivity. The oxaliplatin combination reinforced G1 arrest and enhanced cell death, with abemaciclib producing more pronounced apoptotic induction than palbociclib - an effect not explained by differential pRB target engagement (both inhibitors reduced pRB Ser807/811 phosphorylation by [~]50%), likely reflecting abemaciclibs broader kinase inhibitory profile. shRNA-mediated RB1 silencing partially attenuated the combinatorial effect, providing direct genetic evidence that the synergy is RB-dependent. Importantly, the combination did not significantly potentiate oxaliplatin cytotoxicity in non-tumoral IEC-6 intestinal epithelial cells, in contrast to the pronounced enhancement observed in tumor cells, and synergistic benefit was preserved at sub-cytotoxic inhibitor concentrations. These findings identify oxaliplatin as the optimal chemotherapeutic partner for CDK4/6 inhibition in CRC, with a mechanism involving RB-dependent potentiation of apoptosis that is preferentially active against tumor cells and maintained at clinically relevant inhibitor doses.

cancer biology↗

Estimating the replicability of Brazilian biomedical science

Concerns over the replicability and reproducibility of published research have grown in many research fields, but empirical data to inform policies are still scarce. Biomedical research in Brazil expanded rapidly over the last three decades, with no systematic assessment of the replicability of its findings. With this in mind, we set up the Brazilian Reproducibility Initiative, a multicenter replication of published experiments from Brazilian science using three common experimental methods: the MTT assay, the reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the elevated plus maze (EPM). A total of 56 laboratories performed 143 replications of 56 experiments; of these, 90 replications of 45 experiments were considered valid by an independent committee. Replication rates for these experiments varied between 20 and 44% according to five predefined criteria. In median terms, ratios between group means were 58% lower in replications than in original experiments, while coefficients of variation were 82% higher. Effect size decrease was smaller for MTT experiments, original results with less variability and those considered more challenging to replicate, while t values for replications were positively correlated with researcher predictions about replicability, and negatively correlated with the rate of publications by the original articles last author. Deviations from preregistered protocols were very common in replications, most frequently due to reasons inherent to the experimental model or related to infrastructure and logistics. Our results highlight factors that limit the replicability of results published by researchers in Brazil and suggest ways by which this scenario can be improved.

scientific communication and education↗