bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Souaze, F.

Publications and source records attributed to Souaze, F..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

MCL-1 as a molecular switch between myofibroblastic and pro-angiogenic features of breast cancer-associated fibroblasts

Breast cancer-associated fibroblasts (bCAFs) comprise inflammatory CAFs (iCAFs), characterized by the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and myofibroblastic CAFs (myCAFs), distinguished by their high production of extracellular matrix and their immunosuppressive properties. We previously showed that targeting the anti-apoptotic protein MCL-1 in primary culture of bCAF derived directly from human samples reduces their myofibroblastic characteristics. We herein show by single-cell RNA-sequencing analysis of bCAFs that MCL-1 knock down induces a phenotypic shift from wound-myCAF to IL-iCAF, characterized by the upregulation of genes associated with inflammation as well as angiogenesis-related genes. In vitro, genetic and pharmacologic MCL-1 inhibition increases VEGF secretion by bCAFs, enhancing endothelial cell tubulogenesis. In a chicken chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) model in ovo, co-engraftment of breast cancer cells and bCAFs with reduced MCL-1 expression leads to heightened peritumoral vascular density, driven by VEGF. Mechanistically, the pro-angiogenic phenotype revealed by MCL-1 inhibition is dependent on BAX-BAK activity. It results in NF-{kappa}B activation, inhibition of which by a IKK{beta} inhibitor suppresses the transcription of VEGF and pro-inflammatory factors triggered by MCL-1 inhibition in bCAFs. Chemotherapy induces a downregulation of MCL-1 in bCAFs and it promotes a pro-angiogenic phenotype, counteracted by overexpressed MCL-1. Overall, these findings uncover a novel regulatory function of MCL-1 in determining bCAF subpopulation differentiation and highlight its role in modulating their pro-angiogenic properties, in response to treatment in particular.

cancer biology↗

Cancer associated fibroblasts mitigate the efficacy of the combination treatment of chemotherapy and BCL-xL targeting in triple negative breast cancer cells

Triple negative breast cancers (TNBC) present a poor prognosis primarily due to their resistance to chemotherapy. This resistance is understood to associate with elevated expression of certain antiapoptotic members within the proteins of the BCL-2 family (namely BCL-xL, MCL-1 and BCL-2). These regulate cell death by inhibiting pro-apoptotic protein activation through binding and sequestration and they can be selectively antagonized by BH3 mimetics. Yet the individual influences of BCL-xL, MCL-1, and BCL-2 on the sensitivity of TNBC cells to chemotherapy, and their regulation by cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), major components of the tumor stroma and key contributors to therapy resistance remain to be delineated. By utilizing engineered TNBC cell line MDA-MB-231 deficient in BCL-2 family proteins and BH3 mimetics, we show that BCL-xL and MCL-1 promote cancer cell survival by compensatory mechanisms. This cell line shows limited sensitivity to chemotherapy, in line with the clinical resistance observed in TNBC patients. We elucidate that BCL-xL plays a pivotal role in therapy response, as its depletion or pharmacological inhibition heightened chemotherapy effectiveness. Moreover, BCL-xL expression is associated to chemotherapy resistance in patient-derived tumoroids where its pharmacological inhibition enhances ex vivo response to chemotherapy. In a co-culture model of cancer cells and CAFs, we observe that even in a context where BCL-xL inhibition renders cancer cells more susceptible to chemotherapy, those in contact with CAFs display reduced sensitivity to chemotherapy. Thus CAFs exert a profound pro-survival effect in breast cancer cells, even in a setting highly favoring cell death through combined chemotherapy and inhibition of the main actor of chemoresistance, BCL-xL.

cancer biology↗

SARS-CoV2 E and 3a proteins are inducers of pannexin currents

Controversial reports have suggested that SARS-CoV E and 3a proteins may be viroporins that conduct currents through the plasma membrane of the infected cells. If true, these proteins would represent accessible targets for the development of new antiviral drugs by using high-throughput patch-clamp techniques. Here we aimed at better characterizing the cell responses induced by E or 3a protein with a particular focus on the ion conductances measured at the cell surface. First, we show that expression of SARS-CoV-2 E or 3a protein in CHO cells gives rise to cells with newly-acquired round shape, tending to detach from the Petri dish. This suggests that cell death is induced upon expression of E or 3a protein. We confirmed this hypothesis by using flow cytometry, in agreement with earlier reports on other cell types. In adhering cells expressing E or 3a protein, whole-cell currents were in fact not different from the control condition indicating that E and 3a proteins are not plasma membrane viroporins. In contrast, recording currents on detached cells uncovered outwardly-rectifying currents, much larger than those observed in control. The current characteristics are reminiscent of what was previously observed in cells expressing SARS-CoV-1 E or 3a proteins. Herein, we illustrate for the first time that carbenoxolone blocks these outward currents suggesting that they are conducted by pannexin channels, mostly likely activated by cell morphology change and/or cell death. Alongside we also demonstrate that truncation of the C-terminal PDZ binding motifs reduces the proportion of dying cells but does not prevent pannexin currents suggesting distinct pathways for cell death and pannexin currents induced by E and 3a proteins. We conclude that SARS-CoV-2 E and 3a proteins are not acting as viroporins expressed at the plasma membrane. Author SummaryA viroporin (or viral porin) is a class of proteins that is encoded by a virus genome. It is named porin because its biological role is to conduct ions through a pore that it created in a lipid membrane such as the one surrounding a human cell. if such viroporin is present at the external membrane of a human cell infected by a virus, it can be an easy target of an antiviral agent which thus does not have to enter the cell to be active. One example of viroporin is the flu M2 protein that is the target of amantadine, an antiviral agent used against flu. In previous studies, two proteins of SARS-CoV viruses, named E protein and 3a protein, have been suggested to be viroporins at the surface of infected human cells, potentially opening a new research avenue against SARS. Here we demonstrate that both proteins are not viroporins at the external membrane but they rather trigger changes in the cell shape and promote cell death. They only indirectly induce the activity of a porin that is encoded by the cell genome, named pannexin.

cell biology↗

Targeting of MCL-1 in breast cancer associated fibroblasts reverses their myofibroblastic phenotype and pro-invasive properties

Cancer associated fibroblasts (CAF) are a major cellular component of epithelial tumors. In breast cancers in particular these stromal cells have numerous tumorigenic effects in part due to their acquisition of a myofibroblastic phenotype. Breast CAFs (bCAFS) typically express MCL-1. We show here that targeting this regulator of mitochondrial integrity using a specific BH-3 mimetic promotes fragmentation of these organelles without inducing cell death. MCL-1 antagonism in primary bCAFs directly derived from human samples mitigates myofibroblastic features and decreases expression of genes involved in actomyosin organization and contractility, associated with a cytoplasmic retention of the transcriptional regulator, Yes-Associated Protein (YAP). Such treatment decreases bCAFs ability to promote cancer cells invasion in 3D co-culture assays. These effects are counteracted by an inhibitor of the mitochondrial fission protein DRP-1, which interacts with MCL-1 upon BH3 mimetic treatment. Our findings underscore the usefulness of targeting MCL-1 in breast cancer ecosystems, not only to favor death of cancer cells but also to counteract the tumorigenic activation of fibroblasts with which they co-evolve. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

cancer biology↗